HHS Awards $11M for TTA Hub Development to AD HOC LLC Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,043,085 ($11.0M)

Contractor: AD HOC LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2024-01-26

End Date: 2027-01-26

Contract Duration: 1,096 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SERVICES TO CONTINUE TO ITERATIVELY BUILD THE TTA HUB, A CENTRALIZED REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM, THAT ENABLES TTA LEADERS IN THE OHS CENTRAL OFFICE AND 12 REGIONS, AND THEIR CONTRACTORS, TO SHARE INFORMATION ABOUT GRANT RE

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $11.0 million to AD HOC LLC for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SERVICES TO CONTINUE TO ITERATIVELY BUILD THE TTA HUB, A CENTRALIZED REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM, THAT ENABLES TTA LEADERS IN THE OHS CENTRAL OFFICE AND 12 REGIONS, AND THEIR CONTRACTORS, TO SHARE INFORMATION ABOUT GRANT RE Key points: 1. The contract focuses on building a centralized reporting and data system for TTA leaders. 2. AD HOC LLC is the contractor, with services spanning custom computer programming. 3. The contract is awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The project aims to improve information sharing among TTA leaders and contractors across 12 regions.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11,043,085.31 for a 3-year period appears reasonable for custom software development. Benchmarking against similar large-scale data system development contracts would provide a clearer assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds are being used efficiently, with pricing likely driven by market forces.

Public Impact

Improved data sharing for TTA leaders and contractors. Enhanced reporting capabilities for grant information. Potential for more efficient program management and decision-making. Centralized system could streamline operations across 12 regions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
  • Potential for scope creep in iterative development.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for a critical system.

Positive Signals

  • Clear objective for a centralized data system.
  • Awarded through full and open competition.
  • Long-term contract duration allows for sustained development.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically custom computer programming. Spending in this area is substantial across federal agencies for developing and maintaining critical systems. Benchmarks for similar custom programming contracts vary widely based on complexity and scope.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved in this specific award, as the contract was awarded to AD HOC LLC. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The award process through full and open competition suggests a degree of oversight. However, ongoing oversight of performance, adherence to schedule, and budget will be crucial for the successful delivery of the TTA Hub.

Related Government Programs

  • Custom Computer Programming Services
  • Department of Health and Human Services Contracting
  • Administration for Children and Families Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for vendor lock-in.
  • Lack of defined performance metrics.
  • Complexity of integrating data across 12 regions.
  • Reliance on iterative development without clear end-state definition.

Tags

custom-computer-programming-services, department-of-health-and-human-services, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $11.0 million to AD HOC LLC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SERVICES TO CONTINUE TO ITERATIVELY BUILD THE TTA HUB, A CENTRALIZED REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM, THAT ENABLES TTA LEADERS IN THE OHS CENTRAL OFFICE AND 12 REGIONS, AND THEIR CONTRACTORS, TO SHARE INFORMATION ABOUT GRANT RE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AD HOC LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Administration for Children and Families).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-01-26. End: 2027-01-26.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for the TTA Hub development, and how will success be measured?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for the TTA Hub development. A comprehensive success measurement framework should include metrics related to system uptime, data accuracy, user adoption rates, and the efficiency gains achieved through improved information sharing. Regular performance reviews against these KPIs will be essential for ensuring the contractor meets project objectives and delivers value.

What is the risk of vendor lock-in with AD HOC LLC, given the iterative development approach for a centralized system?

There is a moderate risk of vendor lock-in, as AD HOC LLC will be deeply involved in the iterative development of the TTA Hub. To mitigate this, the contract should include provisions for knowledge transfer, clear documentation standards, and potentially modular system architecture that allows for future modifications or integrations by other vendors. Regular reviews of the development roadmap and adherence to open standards can also reduce dependency.

How will the TTA Hub's effectiveness in improving information sharing and decision-making be evaluated post-implementation?

The effectiveness of the TTA Hub will be evaluated through a combination of user feedback, system usage analytics, and performance metrics tied to its intended purpose. Post-implementation assessments should measure improvements in data accessibility, the speed of information dissemination, and the impact on decision-making processes for TTA leaders and contractors. Surveys and interviews with stakeholders will provide qualitative insights into the system's real-world impact.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesCustom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1676 INTERNATIONAL DR STE 530, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,043,085

Exercised Options: $11,043,085

Current Obligation: $11,043,085

Actual Outlays: $6,902,977

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F392DA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-01-26

Current End Date: 2027-01-26

Potential End Date: 2027-01-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-26

More Contracts from AD HOC LLC

View all AD HOC LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

View all Department of Health and Human Services contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending