HHS awards $3.7M for staffing support, with 3 bidders competing for this delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,711,403 ($3.7M)

Contractor: ASI Government, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2023-09-07

End Date: 2026-03-06

Contract Duration: 911 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: BARDA CMA ACQUISITION STAFFING SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $3.7 million to ASI GOVERNMENT, LLC for work described as: BARDA CMA ACQUISITION STAFFING SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the competitive nature of the award. 2. Competition dynamics show a healthy level of interest from multiple bidders. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the established nature of the services and contractor. 4. Performance context is administrative management and general management consulting. 5. Sector positioning is within the broader health and human services support domain.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.7 million for approximately 911 days of service appears reasonable, especially considering it was awarded under full and open competition. Benchmarking against similar administrative management consulting contracts suggests that the pricing is likely competitive. The per-unit cost, while not explicitly detailed, can be inferred to be within market norms given the competitive award process.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. With three bidders participating, the level of competition suggests that price discovery was effective, and the government likely received competitive pricing. The presence of multiple bidders reduces the risk of contractor overreach or inflated costs.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that drives down costs and ensures the government receives the best value for its investment in administrative support services.

Public Impact

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) benefits from enhanced administrative management and general management consulting services. Services delivered include crucial support for staffing and operational efficiency within the Office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). Geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, supporting federal operations. Workforce implications involve the provision of specialized consulting expertise to augment government staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Multiple bidders participated in the solicitation.
Contractor has a track record with the government.
Services are for administrative support, a common government function.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is vital for supporting government operations across various agencies. Comparable spending in this area is substantial, reflecting the ongoing need for specialized expertise in areas like staffing, program management, and operational efficiency. The market size for such services is large and diverse, with many firms capable of providing these solutions.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The award to ASI GOVERNMENT, LLC, a company that may or may not be a small business itself, means that direct opportunities for small business subcontracting may be limited unless voluntarily pursued by the prime contractor. Further analysis would be needed to determine the overall impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases, though detailed performance reports are typically internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

HHS Staffing Support Services
Administrative Management Consulting
Government Operations Support
ASPR Support Contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $3.7 million to ASI GOVERNMENT, LLC. BARDA CMA ACQUISITION STAFFING SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASI GOVERNMENT, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-07. End: 2026-03-06.

What is ASI GOVERNMENT, LLC's track record with the federal government, particularly within HHS?

ASI GOVERNMENT, LLC has a history of receiving federal contracts, including those with the Department of Health and Human Services. While the provided data focuses on this specific delivery order, a broader search of federal procurement databases would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance. This includes the types of services rendered, contract values, and client agencies. Understanding their past performance is crucial for assessing their capability to successfully execute this current contract, particularly in areas like timely delivery, quality of service, and adherence to budget. A review of past performance evaluations, if publicly available, would offer further insight into their reliability and effectiveness as a government contractor.

How does the $3.7 million value compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts awarded by HHS or other agencies?

The $3.7 million value for this 911-day delivery order for administrative management and general management consulting services appears to be within a reasonable range when compared to similar contracts. Federal procurement data indicates that contracts for these types of services can vary significantly based on scope, duration, and specific requirements. However, for a contract involving staffing support and general management consulting over approximately 2.5 years, this value suggests a competitive rate, especially given the 'full and open competition' award. Benchmarking against contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (like 541611) and contract types (labor hours) would provide a more precise comparison. The presence of three bidders further supports the notion that the pricing is likely market-aligned.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract are typical for professional services engagements: potential for cost overruns if labor hours are not managed efficiently, performance deficiencies if the contractor fails to meet service level expectations, and potential delays in service delivery. Mitigation strategies are inherent in the contract structure and oversight. The 'full and open competition' with three bidders helps mitigate pricing risks. The contract's defined period of performance (ending March 2026) and the 'delivery order' nature allow for clear milestones. The government's contracting officer and program staff will monitor performance against the statement of work, with remedies available for non-performance. The contractor's own quality control processes and experience in this service area also serve as risk mitigation factors.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for money for this specific contract?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered highly effective in ensuring value for money, and this contract appears to be a good example. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, the government maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive proposals. The fact that three bidders submitted offers indicates sufficient market interest and competition. This competitive pressure typically drives down prices and encourages offerors to propose innovative solutions and demonstrate strong past performance to win the contract. For administrative management and general management consulting services, where numerous firms possess the requisite capabilities, this approach is particularly well-suited to achieving cost savings and obtaining high-quality services for the taxpayer.

What are the historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services within HHS or ASPR?

Historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services within HHS and its sub-agencies like ASPR show a consistent and significant investment in these areas. Agencies frequently procure these services to augment internal capabilities, manage complex projects, improve operational efficiency, and provide specialized expertise not readily available in-house. Spending often fluctuates based on agency priorities, budget allocations, and specific program needs, such as preparedness initiatives. While this specific $3.7 million award is a single data point, the broader trend indicates a sustained demand for such consulting services across the federal government, driven by the need for effective management and administrative support in executing diverse public missions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 75A50123Q00005

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 13873 PARK CENTER ROAD, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,177,626

Exercised Options: $3,711,403

Current Obligation: $3,711,403

Actual Outlays: $3,395,167

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA18D0045

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline