DHS awards $6.9M contract for Kodiak Galley M&R to Jay-Brant General Contractors

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,939,027 ($6.9M)

Contractor: Jay-Brant General Contractors, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2024-04-08

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 813 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: KODIAK GALLEY M&R AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: KODIAK, KODIAK ISLAND County, ALASKA, 99619

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $6.9 million to JAY-BRANT GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC for work described as: KODIAK GALLEY M&R AWARD Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for Maintenance and Repair (M&R) services, indicating ongoing facility upkeep. 3. The duration of 813 days suggests a medium-term project. 4. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. The award amount is relatively modest for a federal construction contract. 6. Geographic location in Alaska may present logistical challenges and impact costs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.9 million for an 813-day M&R project appears reasonable within the context of construction and maintenance services. Without specific benchmarks for galley M&R in Alaska, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests the government has negotiated a set cost, which can be advantageous if the contractor manages costs effectively. The number of bids received (though not explicitly stated, implied by 'full and open competition') would further inform value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which is a specific type of full and open competition. This indicates that the solicitation was made available to all responsible sources, but certain sources were excluded from the initial bidding process for specific reasons, yet the overall competition was broad. The number of bids received would be crucial to fully assess the level of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple contractors to offer their best pricing and terms to win the award.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard personnel and operations at the Kodiak facility will benefit from improved galley facilities. Services delivered include maintenance and repair, ensuring the functionality and safety of the galley. The geographic impact is localized to Kodiak, Alaska. The contract supports the construction and maintenance workforce, likely including skilled tradespeople in Alaska.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise in the remote Alaskan location.
Logistical challenges in Alaska could impact project timelines and material availability.
Ensuring compliance with all environmental and safety regulations in a sensitive Arctic environment.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, indicating potential for good value.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Contractor has experience in general contracting, likely possessing relevant skills for M&R.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. This sector encompasses a wide range of construction activities, including maintenance and repair of facilities. Federal spending in this area is substantial, supporting infrastructure across various government agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at the cost per square foot for similar M&R projects in similar geographic regions, considering factors like climate and remoteness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Jay-Brant General Contractors, LLC, is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award notice. The absence of a small business set-aside means opportunities for small business participation may be limited unless proactively pursued by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will be managed by the U.S. Coast Guard, a component of the Department of Homeland Security. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, particularly the fixed-price structure which incentivizes contractor performance. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings and Facilities Construction
Military Construction
Government Facility Maintenance and Repair
Department of Homeland Security Procurement
U.S. Coast Guard Operations Support

Risk Flags

Potential for cost increases due to remote location.
Logistical challenges in Alaska.
Weather-related delays.
Availability of skilled labor in remote areas.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $6.9 million to JAY-BRANT GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC. KODIAK GALLEY M&R AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JAY-BRANT GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-04-08. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Jay-Brant General Contractors, LLC with federal contracts, particularly in Alaska?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess Jay-Brant General Contractors, LLC's track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Their experience with projects in Alaska, specifically, would be a key indicator of their capability to handle the logistical and environmental challenges inherent in such a location. Without access to detailed performance history, it's difficult to definitively gauge their reliability for this specific M&R project.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar galley maintenance and repair projects in remote or Arctic regions?

Benchmarking this $6.9 million contract against similar galley M&R projects in remote or Arctic regions is challenging without specific, comparable data. Factors such as the scope of work (e.g., specific equipment replacement, structural repairs, modernization), the size of the galley, and the exact location's logistical costs significantly influence pricing. Generally, projects in Alaska incur higher costs due to transportation, specialized labor requirements, and shorter construction seasons. A detailed cost breakdown from the contractor, if available, would be needed for a more precise comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with performing construction and maintenance in Kodiak, Alaska?

Performing construction and maintenance in Kodiak, Alaska, presents several significant risks. These include extreme weather conditions (cold temperatures, high winds, snow, ice) that can disrupt schedules and increase labor costs. Logistical challenges are paramount, involving potentially expensive and time-consuming transportation of materials, equipment, and personnel. Environmental considerations, such as protecting sensitive ecosystems and adhering to strict regulations, add complexity. Furthermore, the availability of a skilled local workforce might be limited, potentially requiring the contractor to bring in workers from outside, further increasing costs and logistical demands.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the operational readiness of the U.S. Coast Guard facility in Kodiak?

This contract is expected to positively impact the operational readiness of the U.S. Coast Guard facility in Kodiak by ensuring the galley, a critical support function for personnel, is well-maintained and fully operational. A functional and modern galley contributes to crew morale and well-being, which are essential for maintaining high operational effectiveness. By addressing maintenance and repair needs, the contract helps prevent potential disruptions caused by equipment failure or facility degradation, thereby supporting the continuous mission readiness of the stationed personnel.

What historical spending trends exist for galley maintenance and repair by the U.S. Coast Guard or Department of Homeland Security?

Analyzing historical spending trends for galley M&R by the U.S. Coast Guard or DHS would require accessing detailed procurement databases over several fiscal years. This would reveal patterns in contract values, types of services procured, and the frequency of such awards. Understanding these trends can help contextualize the current $6.9 million award, indicating whether it represents a typical investment, an increase, or a decrease in spending for these services. It could also highlight specific regions or facilities that have historically received more attention for M&R.

Were there any specific exclusions of sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' process, and what was their justification?

The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' implies that while the solicitation was broadly advertised, certain potential bidders were excluded from participating. The justification for such exclusions typically relates to specific requirements, such as past performance issues, failure to meet pre-qualification criteria, or national security concerns. Without further details from the solicitation documents or award justification, the precise reasons for excluding specific sources remain unknown. This exclusion could potentially limit the breadth of competition, though the 'full and open' aspect suggests a significant number of bidders were still considered.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 70Z08724RKODI16190078

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 460 GRUBSTAKE AVE, HOMER, AK, 99603

Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,939,027

Exercised Options: $6,939,027

Current Obligation: $6,939,027

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70Z08718DPJT24300

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline