DHS awards $33.7M contract for electrical system maintenance to Executive Technologies Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,735 ($33.7K)

Contractor: Executive Technologies Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2023-08-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MIFC LANT ELELCTRICAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE

Place of Performance

Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23460

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $33,735.36 to EXECUTIVE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION for work described as: MIFC LANT ELELCTRICAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year maintenance agreement. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Contract duration of three years presents moderate performance risk. 4. This contract supports critical infrastructure for the U.S. Coast Guard. 5. The award falls within the 'Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing' NAICS code, which may warrant further investigation for relevance. 6. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $33.7 million over three years for electrical system maintenance appears to be within a reasonable range for a federal agency like the U.S. Coast Guard. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facility maintenance and electrical services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests the government has secured a predictable cost, assuming the contractor can manage their expenses effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and had the opportunity to bid. The presence of a single award suggests that Executive Technologies Corporation offered the best value among the competing proposals. The level of competition is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring a fair market rate.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation from contractors.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard benefits from reliable electrical systems, ensuring operational readiness. Services include maintenance and repair of electrical systems, crucial for facility functionality. The primary geographic impact is likely within the operational areas of the U.S. Coast Guard, potentially nationwide. The contract supports jobs within the electrical maintenance and contracting sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The NAICS code 'Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing' seems incongruous with electrical system maintenance, raising questions about the accuracy of the classification or the scope of services.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's performance trajectory.
The contract duration of three years, while standard, requires ongoing monitoring to ensure continued value and performance.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Executive Technologies Corporation is the sole awardee, indicating they met the government's requirements effectively.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the broad category of facilities maintenance and operations, a significant segment of federal spending. The market for electrical system maintenance is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized services. Federal agencies often contract for these services to ensure the upkeep of critical infrastructure, ranging from office buildings to operational facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within the General Services Administration (GSA) schedules or through analysis of similar agency contracts for facility support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem may be limited unless Executive Technologies Corporation voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the U.S. Coast Guard contracting officer and their representatives. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, where the contractor is responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, although detailed performance reports are often internal.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings and Facilities Maintenance
Department of Homeland Security Operations Support
U.S. Coast Guard Infrastructure

Risk Flags

NAICS code mismatch
Potential for performance issues if contractor lacks relevant expertise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $33,735.36 to EXECUTIVE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. MIFC LANT ELELCTRICAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EXECUTIVE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33,735.36.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the specific nature of the electrical system maintenance being performed under this contract, and why is it classified under 'Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing'?

The provided data lists the contract description as 'MIFC LANT ELELCTRICAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE' and the NAICS code as '315999 - Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing.' This classification appears to be a significant discrepancy. Electrical system maintenance typically falls under NAICS codes related to facilities support services, construction, or repair. It is highly probable that the NAICS code is either an error in data entry or reflects a very niche aspect of the contract not immediately apparent from the description. Further investigation into the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would be necessary to clarify the exact services and confirm the correct industry classification. Without this clarification, assessing the contract's alignment with industry standards and market pricing is challenging.

How does the $33.7 million contract value compare to similar electrical system maintenance contracts awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard or other Department of Homeland Security components?

To accurately benchmark the $33.7 million contract value, a detailed analysis of comparable contracts is required. This would involve searching federal procurement databases for contracts with similar scopes of work (e.g., electrical system maintenance, facility support, infrastructure repair) awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard and other DHS agencies over the past 3-5 years. Key comparison points would include contract duration, geographic scope, specific services rendered, and the total contract value. Without access to such a comparative dataset, it's difficult to definitively state whether this award represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, for a three-year contract supporting critical infrastructure, the amount is not inherently excessive but warrants comparison.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for Executive Technologies Corporation under this contract, and how will their performance be measured?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or the measurement methods for Executive Technologies Corporation. Typically, federal contracts for maintenance services include performance standards related to response times for emergency repairs, preventative maintenance completion rates, system uptime, and adherence to safety protocols. The contract's firm fixed-price nature implies that the contractor is incentivized to meet these standards to avoid incurring additional costs. The U.S. Coast Guard's contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring performance against the contract's requirements and the established KPIs.

What is the track record of Executive Technologies Corporation in performing similar federal contracts, particularly those involving electrical system maintenance?

Information regarding Executive Technologies Corporation's specific track record for electrical system maintenance contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their past performance on federal contracts, including any past performance evaluations, contract modifications, or disputes. Examining their history with the U.S. Coast Guard or other agencies would provide insight into their reliability, quality of work, and ability to manage complex maintenance projects. Without this historical data, it's challenging to fully evaluate the risk associated with awarding this contract to them.

What is the potential impact of the 'Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing' NAICS code classification on the contract's oversight and performance evaluation?

The incongruous NAICS code classification ('Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing') for a contract described as 'ELECTRICAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE' poses a significant challenge for oversight and performance evaluation. Procurement and oversight teams often rely on NAICS codes to categorize contracts, identify relevant industry standards, and assign appropriate technical expertise. If the code is incorrect, it could lead to misclassification in federal spending reports, potentially skewing market analysis and benchmarking efforts. Furthermore, it might indicate a lack of specialized oversight personnel familiar with electrical systems being assigned to monitor this contract, or it could suggest a misunderstanding of the contract's true scope. Clarifying this discrepancy is crucial for effective program management and accountability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing › Other Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 810 TRAVELERS BLVD STE E1, SUMMERVILLE, SC, 29485

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $54,906

Exercised Options: $33,735

Current Obligation: $33,735

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07F5625P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline