DHS Coast Guard awards $30.3M for engine equipment, with 14 bidders indicating strong competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,324 ($30.3K)

Contractor: Morgan Ingland LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-06-11

Contract Duration: 63 days

Daily Burn Rate: $481/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4330-01-728-5620 FILTER

Place of Performance

Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21224

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $30,323.8 to MORGAN INGLAND LLC for work described as: 4330-01-728-5620 FILTER Key points: 1. The contract value of $30.3M for engine equipment appears reasonable given the scope and duration. 2. Strong competition with 14 bidders suggests effective price discovery and potential value for taxpayers. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. This award falls within the 'Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing' sector, a niche but essential area. 5. The short performance period (63 days) suggests a focused, immediate need for the equipment. 6. The contractor, Morgan England LLC, is a relatively new entity in federal contracting based on available data.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $30.3M for 'Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing' is difficult to benchmark precisely without more specific details on the equipment. However, the presence of 14 bidders suggests that the pricing was competitive and likely aligned with market rates. The firm-fixed-price structure further enhances value by capping the government's expenditure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a broader outreach to potential vendors. The fact that 14 bids were received indicates robust competition for this requirement. This level of competition is generally favorable for achieving competitive pricing and ensuring a wide range of qualified suppliers were considered.

Taxpayer Impact: A high number of bidders for a contract of this size suggests that taxpayers are likely benefiting from competitive pricing, as vendors vied to offer their best terms to secure the award.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential engine equipment. This equipment is crucial for maintaining operational readiness and maritime security. The services are delivered within Maryland, indicating a localized impact for this specific award. The contract supports the manufacturing sector, potentially impacting a specialized workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited track record for Morgan England LLC in federal contracting requires monitoring.
  • The specific nature of 'Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing' may present unique supply chain risks.
  • Short performance period could indicate urgent operational needs, potentially increasing pressure on delivery.

Positive Signals

  • Strong competition with 14 bidders suggests a healthy market response.
  • Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
  • Awarding agency (DHS Coast Guard) is a critical national security entity.

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing' sector encompasses a wide array of specialized components. While not as large as broader manufacturing categories, it is vital for industries reliant on robust engine performance, including defense, transportation, and maritime operations. Federal spending in this area often supports specialized domestic manufacturing capabilities. Benchmarking this contract's value against similar, highly specific engine equipment awards is challenging without granular product details.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' and the 'sb' (small business) flag is false. This suggests that while the acquisition process allowed for broad competition, there was no specific set-aside for small businesses. The prime contractor, Morgan England LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not detailed but could arise if Morgan England LLC utilizes them.

Oversight & Accountability

As a purchase order awarded under Simplified Acquisition Procedures, oversight may be less intensive than for larger, sole-source, or complex contracts. However, the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Coast Guard have established procurement oversight processes. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. The Inspector General for DHS would have jurisdiction over potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this award.

Related Government Programs

  • Department of Defense Engine Procurement
  • Maritime Equipment Acquisition Programs
  • Coast Guard Vessel Maintenance Contracts
  • Federal Fleet Vehicle Support

Risk Flags

  • Contractor Performance Risk
  • Supply Chain Dependency
  • Urgent Requirement Delivery Pressure

Tags

other-engine-equipment-manufacturing, department-of-homeland-security, u-s-coast-guard, purchase-order, competed-under-sap, firm-fixed-price, maryland, mid-size-contract, maritime-defense, manufacturing-sector

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $30,323.8 to MORGAN INGLAND LLC. 4330-01-728-5620 FILTER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MORGAN INGLAND LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30,323.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-06-11.

What is the specific type of engine equipment being procured, and what are its intended applications within the U.S. Coast Guard?

The provided data classifies this contract under 'Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing' (NAICS code 333618) with the product service code PSC likely related to engines or engine parts. However, the exact specifications and intended applications are not detailed. Given the awarding agency is the U.S. Coast Guard, the equipment is likely related to propulsion systems, auxiliary power units, or specialized engine components for cutters, boats, or shore-based facilities critical for maritime law enforcement, search and rescue, and national security operations.

How does the $30.3 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar engine equipment by the U.S. Coast Guard or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $30.3 million contract value requires detailed comparison with specific engine equipment procurements. Without knowing the exact type and quantity of equipment, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the presence of 14 bidders suggests a competitive environment, which typically drives prices towards market norms. Historical data from agencies like the Navy or Army for similar maritime engine components could provide context, but variations in specifications, volume, and contract terms (e.g., warranty, support) would need careful consideration.

What is the track record of Morgan England LLC in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly those involving complex manufacturing or engine equipment?

Based on the provided data, Morgan England LLC is listed as the contractor. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases would be necessary to ascertain their full track record. The 'na' field indicating '333618' (Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing) suggests their area of expertise. However, the limited duration of this specific contract (63 days) and the absence of extensive historical award data in the snippet imply they might be a newer entrant or a specialized supplier. Assessing their past performance on similar scale or complexity contracts is crucial for risk evaluation.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, considering the contractor's profile and the nature of the equipment?

Potential risks include the contractor's performance history, especially if they are a newer entity in federal contracting, which could lead to delivery delays or quality issues. The specialized nature of 'Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing' might also present supply chain vulnerabilities if key components are sourced from limited suppliers. Furthermore, the firm-fixed-price nature, while beneficial for cost control, places the risk of cost overruns on the contractor, which could incentivize shortcuts if not properly monitored. The short performance period could also indicate an urgent need, increasing pressure and potential for unforeseen challenges.

How does the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation impact the overall value and efficiency of this procurement process?

Competing under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) generally streamlines the procurement process for purchases below certain thresholds (currently $250,000, though specific agency rules may apply). For a $30.3 million contract, this designation is unusual and suggests either a specific interpretation of SAP or potentially an error in the data provided, as large dollar value contracts typically follow FAR Part 15 procedures. If indeed competed under SAP, it implies a faster, less formal process, potentially leading to quicker award. The high number of bidders (14) indicates that even within SAP parameters, significant competition was achieved, likely contributing to good value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingEngine, Turbine, and Power Transmission Equipment ManufacturingOther Engine Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: PUMPS AND COMPRESSORS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 14

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 380 TENNANT AVE STE 3, MORGAN HILL, CA, 95037

Business Categories: Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,324

Exercised Options: $30,324

Current Obligation: $30,324

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-09

Current End Date: 2026-06-11

Potential End Date: 2026-06-11 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-09

Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts

View all Department of Homeland Security contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending