DHS awards $5.68M contract for mission sustainment lab support to New Generation Solution LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,678,591 ($5.7M)

Contractor: NEW Generation Solution LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2024-08-28

End Date: 2026-08-27

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: MISSION SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT LAB SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ELIZABETH CITY, PASQUOTANK County, NORTH CAROLINA, 27909

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $5.7 million to NEW GENERATION SOLUTION LLC for work described as: MISSION SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT LAB SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a moderate investment in essential lab support services. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. The contract duration of 729 days (2 years) allows for sustained operational support. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. The award is for Computer Systems Design Services, indicating a focus on technical infrastructure. 6. Geographic location of service delivery is North Carolina.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $5.68 million over two years for lab support services appears reasonable given the scope of 'MISSION SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT LAB SUPPORT SERVICES'. Benchmarking against similar contracts for IT support and lab services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for the government when requirements are well-defined, as it caps the government's financial exposure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES', indicating that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded prior to the main solicitation. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' nature suggests multiple interested parties were likely involved. This level of competition is generally expected to drive competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with prior exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to bid, which can lead to more favorable pricing and better service offerings.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard benefits from sustained mission support and lab services. Essential IT infrastructure and computer systems design services are delivered. Services are primarily delivered in North Carolina. The contract supports the operational readiness and technological capabilities of the Coast Guard.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited vendor pool due to 'exclusion of sources' prior to full and open competition.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess contractor performance.
The 'Computer Systems Design Services' NAICS code is broad and may not fully capture the specific technical requirements of lab support.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition generally promotes a competitive market.
The contract duration allows for stable and consistent service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a critical component of the broader IT services industry. The market for these services is large and competitive, with government agencies being significant consumers. This specific award supports the operational technology needs of a federal agency, likely involving the maintenance, upgrade, or design of specialized lab systems and associated IT infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside requirement. However, the prime contractor may still engage small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the U.S. Coast Guard contracting officers and program managers. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Accountability is enforced through the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Homeland Security IT Support Services
U.S. Coast Guard Operational Support Contracts
Federal Computer Systems Design Services
Lab Support Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources'.
Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data.
Contract duration may be insufficient for long-term strategic IT planning.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical lab support.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $5.7 million to NEW GENERATION SOLUTION LLC. MISSION SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT LAB SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NEW GENERATION SOLUTION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-08-28. End: 2026-08-27.

What is the track record of New Generation Solution LLC with the federal government, particularly in providing lab support or computer systems design services?

A comprehensive review of New Generation Solution LLC's federal contracting history would be necessary to assess their track record. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any contract disputes or terminations, and the types and values of previous contracts awarded to them. Specifically, looking for experience with similar services for agencies like the Department of Homeland Security or the U.S. Coast Guard would be crucial. Without access to detailed past performance data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and expertise for this specific mission sustainment lab support role.

How does the awarded amount of $5.68 million compare to similar lab support or computer systems design contracts awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard or DHS?

To benchmark the $5.68 million award, one would need to compare it against contracts with similar scopes of work, durations, and service requirements within the U.S. Coast Guard or the broader Department of Homeland Security. Factors such as the complexity of the lab environment, the specific IT systems involved, and the level of technical expertise required would influence pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests the value is moderate for a two-year contract, but a detailed comparison with contracts for comparable services (e.g., IT infrastructure support, specialized technical services for research or testing facilities) is needed for a definitive value-for-money conclusion.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, cost overruns if the fixed-price model is poorly estimated, and potential disruptions to mission sustainment if services are interrupted. Mitigation strategies inherent in the contract structure include the firm-fixed-price terms, which place financial risk on the contractor. The government's oversight by contracting officers and program managers, along with defined delivery schedules and performance expectations, also serve as mitigation. The 'exclusion of sources' aspect could pose a risk if it inadvertently limited the competitive pool, potentially impacting price or innovation.

How effective is the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' approach in ensuring optimal value for taxpayers in this specific instance?

The effectiveness of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' hinges on the justification for the initial exclusion. If the exclusion was based on legitimate technical qualifications or prior performance issues with certain vendors, and the subsequent full and open competition still attracted a robust number of bidders, it can be effective. It aims to balance ensuring qualified vendors participate while potentially avoiding problematic ones. However, if the exclusion was arbitrary or significantly narrowed the field, it could reduce competitive pressure and potentially lead to less favorable pricing for taxpayers. The number of bids received post-exclusion is a critical indicator of its success.

What is the historical spending trend for lab support services or computer systems design within the U.S. Coast Guard or DHS?

Analyzing historical spending trends for lab support and computer systems design services within the U.S. Coast Guard and DHS would provide context for this $5.68 million award. This involves examining annual expenditures over several fiscal years for similar contract types and scopes. Significant increases or decreases in spending could indicate shifts in agency priorities, technological advancements, or changes in contracting strategies. Understanding these trends helps assess whether current spending aligns with historical patterns or represents a new investment or a reduction in this service area.

What specific deliverables or performance standards are outlined in the contract that New Generation Solution LLC must meet?

The provided summary data does not detail the specific deliverables or performance standards. A thorough analysis would require reviewing the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). These documents typically outline the exact services required, quality metrics, reporting frequencies, and acceptance criteria. Without this information, it's challenging to fully assess the contractor's obligations and the government's ability to measure performance and ensure mission sustainment is adequately supported.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1950 OPPORTUNITY WAY STE 1300, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,038,230

Exercised Options: $5,987,945

Current Obligation: $5,678,591

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCB22D0420

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline