Electrical Covers for MH-65 Aircraft Procured for $4,213 by DHS Coast Guard

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,213 ($4.2K)

Contractor: Fedcorp Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-05-08

Contract Duration: 36 days

Daily Burn Rate: $117/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 20

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: PROCUREMENT OF 50 EA OF ELECTRICAL COVERS FOR USE ON THE MH-65 AIRCRAFT.

Place of Performance

Location: EL SOBRANTE, CONTRA COSTA County, CALIFORNIA, 94803

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $4,213 to FEDCORP SERVICES, INC. for work described as: PROCUREMENT OF 50 EA OF ELECTRICAL COVERS FOR USE ON THE MH-65 AIRCRAFT. Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the specialized nature of aircraft parts. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially efficient procurement process. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the straightforward nature of the item and short duration. 4. Performance context is tied to maintaining operational readiness of MH-65 aircraft. 5. Sector positioning is within the niche market of aerospace parts manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4,213 for 50 electrical covers is relatively small. Benchmarking against similar specialized aircraft parts suggests this price is within a reasonable range, especially considering the need for specific certifications and quality control in the aerospace industry. The firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $84 per unit. This figure should be compared to industry catalog prices for similar components, accounting for any required aerospace-grade specifications.

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a limited competition environment, likely involving multiple quotes but not a full and open solicitation. The presence of 20 offers indicates a healthy level of interest for this type of procurement, which generally supports price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition under SAP typically allows for more streamlined acquisition, but taxpayers benefit from the solicitation of multiple quotes to ensure a fair market price is obtained for these essential aircraft components.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard benefits from the timely acquisition of necessary parts to maintain its MH-65 aircraft fleet. Essential electrical covers are delivered, ensuring the continued operational capability of critical aviation assets. The geographic impact is primarily within California, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small number of manufacturing or assembly personnel at the contractor's facility.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price escalation if demand for these specific parts increases significantly.
Reliance on a limited number of suppliers for specialized aerospace components can pose a risk.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Multiple offers received indicate a competitive market for this item.
Short contract duration minimizes long-term price exposure.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing sector. This is a specialized segment of the broader aerospace industry, characterized by stringent quality requirements and often long lead times. Spending in this sector is driven by the operational needs of military and civilian aviation fleets, with contracts typically ranging from small component replacements to large system overhauls.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information suggesting significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The nature of specialized aircraft parts manufacturing may lean towards larger, established firms with the necessary certifications, potentially limiting direct small business participation in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this purchase order would typically fall under the U.S. Coast Guard's internal procurement and financial management systems. As a small dollar value purchase under SAP, it likely undergoes standard review processes. Transparency is maintained through contract databases, and accountability rests with the contracting officers and program managers responsible for ensuring compliance and proper execution.

Related Government Programs

MH-65 Helicopter Maintenance
Aerospace Parts Procurement
Department of Homeland Security Aviation Support
Aircraft Component Manufacturing

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruption for specialized parts.
Quality control adherence to aerospace standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $4,213 to FEDCORP SERVICES, INC.. PROCUREMENT OF 50 EA OF ELECTRICAL COVERS FOR USE ON THE MH-65 AIRCRAFT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FEDCORP SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4,213.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-05-08.

What is the track record of FEDCORP SERVICES, INC. in supplying aerospace components to the government?

Information regarding FEDCORP SERVICES, INC.'s specific track record in supplying aerospace components to the government is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require examining their past performance on similar contracts, including delivery timeliness, quality of goods, and adherence to specifications. Reviewing contract databases for previous awards to this vendor, particularly for aircraft parts, would provide insights into their reliability and experience within the defense and aerospace sectors. Understanding their history with the U.S. Coast Guard or other agencies would also be crucial for assessing their suitability and performance consistency.

How does the per-unit cost of $84 for these electrical covers compare to market rates for similar aerospace-grade components?

The per-unit cost of approximately $84 for these electrical covers requires comparison against industry benchmarks for aerospace-grade components. While this price may seem reasonable for specialized parts, a thorough assessment would involve researching catalog prices from major aerospace suppliers (e.g., Boeing, Lockheed Martin suppliers) for equivalent items. Factors such as material, certifications (e.g., FAA, military specifications), and quantity discounts play a significant role. Without specific details on the exact specifications of these electrical covers, it's challenging to provide a definitive market comparison. However, for standard, non-critical components, this price might be on the higher side, whereas for highly specialized, certified parts, it could be competitive.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, considering its short duration and specific item?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its short duration (delivery expected within approximately one month) and the specific, likely non-critical nature of 'electrical covers.' Potential risks include minor delays in delivery, which could impact the immediate maintenance schedule of an MH-65 aircraft, though the impact is likely manageable given the short timeframe. Another risk could be the quality of the components not meeting stringent aerospace standards, potentially leading to rework or premature failure, although the firm fixed-price nature and competition should mitigate this. The risk of significant cost overrun is minimal due to the fixed-price structure and small contract value.

How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedure (SAP) in ensuring value for money for procurements of this size?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed to streamline the procurement process for purchases below a certain threshold (currently $250,000), making it more efficient and cost-effective for both the government and vendors. For procurements like this one, valued at $4,213, SAP is generally effective in reducing administrative burden and speeding up delivery. The requirement to solicit quotes from multiple sources, as indicated by the 20 offers, helps ensure a degree of price competition and value for money. However, the level of competition and oversight is less rigorous than under full and open competition, meaning there's a slightly higher potential for less optimal pricing compared to larger, more extensively competed contracts.

What is the historical spending pattern for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' by the U.S. Coast Guard?

Historical spending patterns for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' by the U.S. Coast Guard would typically show consistent, albeit fluctuating, investment in maintaining its diverse aviation fleet. This category encompasses a wide range of components, from simple hardware to complex electronic systems, necessary for the operational readiness of aircraft like the MH-65. Spending levels are influenced by factors such as aircraft age, operational tempo, maintenance schedules, and budget allocations. Analyzing past contract awards within this NAICS code for the Coast Guard would reveal trends in specific part types, average contract values, and the prevalence of different procurement methods (e.g., competitive vs. sole-source).

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ELECTRICAL/ELECTRONIC EQPT COMPNTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 70Z03826QB0000072

Offers Received: 20

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4863 EL GRANDE PL, EL SOBRANTE, CA, 94803

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,221

Exercised Options: $4,213

Current Obligation: $4,213

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline