DHS Coast Guard Awards $205K for MH-60T Helicopter Components to Sikorsky Aircraft
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $204,796 ($204.8K)
Contractor: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2026-04-08
End Date: 2027-07-07
Contract Duration: 455 days
Daily Burn Rate: $450/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: PURCHASE OF VARIOUS COMPONENTS TO BE UTILIZED ON THE USCG MH-60T HELICOPTERS.
Place of Performance
Location: STRATFORD, FAIRFIELD County, CONNECTICUT, 06614
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $204,796.12 to SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION for work described as: PURCHASE OF VARIOUS COMPONENTS TO BE UTILIZED ON THE USCG MH-60T HELICOPTERS. Key points: 1. Spending focuses on critical MH-60T helicopter components. 2. Sole-source award to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation raises competition concerns. 3. Contract duration is 455 days, ending July 2027. 4. This purchase falls under 'Other Aircraft Parts' manufacturing.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $204,796.12 for helicopter components appears reasonable given the specialized nature of aviation parts. However, without specific component details or benchmarks for similar MH-60T parts, a precise value assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded sole-source, meaning competition was not sought. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competed procurement.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for these essential helicopter parts may result in a higher cost to taxpayers than if multiple vendors had been allowed to bid.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operational readiness of the USCG MH-60T helicopter fleet. Supports critical maintenance and repair activities for national security assets. Potential for increased costs due to sole-source award impacts taxpayer funds.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition
- Potential for inflated pricing without competition
- Lack of transparency in price justification
Positive Signals
- Supports critical USCG aviation assets
- Ensures operational readiness
Sector Analysis
This procurement falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this sector is often characterized by specialized components and long product lifecycles, with significant reliance on original equipment manufacturers.
Small Business Impact
The awardee, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, is a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific sole-source procurement, potentially missing opportunities for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure the price is fair and reasonable. Oversight should focus on the justification for not competing the requirement and the validation of costs.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Homeland Security Contracting
- U.S. Coast Guard Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of demonstrated price competition
- Potential for higher costs
- Limited small business participation
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-homeland-security, ct, delivery-order, 100k-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $204,796.12 to SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION. PURCHASE OF VARIOUS COMPONENTS TO BE UTILIZED ON THE USCG MH-60T HELICOPTERS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $204,796.12.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2027-07-07.
What is the justification for the sole-source award, and was a market survey conducted to confirm no other sources could meet the requirement?
The justification for a sole-source award is crucial for understanding why competition was bypassed. Agencies typically conduct market research to determine if a sole-source procurement is truly necessary. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the government received the best possible value or if alternative, potentially more cost-effective, solutions were overlooked.
How does the unit cost of these components compare to similar parts purchased under competitive contracts for the MH-60T or comparable aircraft?
Benchmarking the unit cost against competitively procured parts is essential for validating the fairness of the price. If this sole-source award's pricing is significantly higher than comparable items, it suggests potential overpayment and a failure to leverage market forces to achieve cost savings for the taxpayer.
What is the long-term strategy for procuring these components, and will future procurements be competed to ensure better pricing and broader industry participation?
Understanding the long-term procurement strategy is vital for assessing future value and risk. If future needs are also planned as sole-source, it indicates a systemic issue. Conversely, a plan to compete future requirements would suggest this award is an exception, potentially mitigating long-term cost concerns.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp
Address: 6900 MAIN ST, STRATFORD, CT, 06614
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $204,796
Exercised Options: $204,796
Current Obligation: $204,796
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 70Z03822DJ0000017
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-08
Current End Date: 2027-07-07
Potential End Date: 2027-07-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-08
More Contracts from Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
- Multi Service, 5 YR, Multi-Yr Contract for H-60 Helicopters. FY2012 FY2016 Production Contract for Army/Navy/Fms Uh/Hh/Mh-60 Helicopters to Include Procurement of UP to 916 Each Aircraft and Related Support, Services, Systems/Project Management, Publications, and Technical Data. FMS Countries Include Saudi Arabian National Guard (sang), Taiwan, Thailand and Royal Australian Navy (RAN) — $11.6B (Department of Defense)
- Procurement of 54 Each Army UH-60M Black Hawk Helicopters; 18 Each Navy MH-60S SEA Hawk Helicopters; 25 Each Navy NH-60R SEA Hawk Helicopters; 9 Each UH-60M Black Hawk Helicopter for Bahrain Defense Force; Tooling; Program Systems Management; Technical Publications — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $6.1B (Department of Defense)
- Acat 1D - CRH — $6.0B (Department of Defense)
- W58rgz-17-C-0009 MY IX Black Hawk Production Contract Award — $5.6B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)