DHS awards $829K for surge training fuel, citing critical need for life and property protection

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $82,903 ($82.9K)

Contractor: J. D. Moore, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2026-03-30

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 184 days

Daily Burn Rate: $451/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY26 SURGE TRAINING FUEL, IN ADVANCE OF FUNDING IS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT ACTIVITIES DEEMED EXCEPTED UNDER DHS PROCEDURES RELATING TO A LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS BECAUSE 1) THE ACTIVITY INVOLVES PROTECTION OF LIFE AND/OR PROPERTY; AND 2) A DELAY IN TH

Place of Performance

Location: BRUNSWICK, GLYNN County, GEORGIA, 31525

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $82,902.94 to J. D. MOORE, INC. for work described as: FY26 SURGE TRAINING FUEL, IN ADVANCE OF FUNDING IS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT ACTIVITIES DEEMED EXCEPTED UNDER DHS PROCEDURES RELATING TO A LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS BECAUSE 1) THE ACTIVITY INVOLVES PROTECTION OF LIFE AND/OR PROPERTY; AND 2) A DELAY IN TH Key points: 1. Contract addresses an urgent need for fuel to support essential training activities. 2. The award was made under simplified acquisition procedures, suggesting a focus on efficiency for smaller procurements. 3. The firm fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 4. The short performance period indicates a specific, time-bound requirement. 5. The contract is for fuel, a commodity with generally stable market pricing. 6. The justification highlights the need to avoid disruption to critical government functions.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $829,000 for a six-month period appears reasonable for specialized fuel supply supporting federal law enforcement training. While specific benchmarks for surge training fuel are not readily available, the price is likely competitive given the firm fixed-price structure and the use of simplified acquisition procedures, which often encourage competitive pricing for smaller dollar amounts. The urgency cited suggests a need that outweighs extensive price negotiation, but the amount is not so large as to warrant immediate concern without further context on fuel market fluctuations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involve a broader range of competition than micro-purchases but may not reach full and open competition. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but SAP aims to solicit offers from as many sources as practicable. The limited nature of the competition under SAP could potentially lead to slightly higher prices than a full and open competition, but it also allows for faster award, which aligns with the urgent need stated in the justification.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, the use of SAP suggests a balance between achieving competitive pricing and ensuring timely delivery of essential services. While not the most competitive scenario, it likely prevented significant delays and associated costs that could have arisen from a more protracted procurement process.

Public Impact

Federal law enforcement personnel undergoing critical training will benefit from uninterrupted access to necessary fuel. The services delivered ensure the continuity of essential training activities at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. The geographic impact is primarily within Georgia, where the training center is located. Workforce implications include ensuring trainers and trainees can complete their programs without fuel-related disruptions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price volatility in fuel markets impacting the fixed-price contract.
Reliance on a single BPA call could limit flexibility if unforeseen issues arise with the supplier.

Positive Signals

Contract addresses a critical operational need, ensuring training continuity.
Use of SAP suggests an effort to streamline procurement for urgent requirements.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader energy sector, specifically focusing on fuel supply for government operations. The market for fuel dealers is generally competitive, with pricing influenced by global commodity markets, transportation costs, and regional supply/demand. The value of this contract is relatively small within the overall federal spending on fuel, which encompasses a wide range of needs across various agencies and operational contexts. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing fuel costs for similar training facilities or operational units within federal law enforcement.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included a small business set-aside or if J. D. Moore, Inc. is a small business. Without this information, it is difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, the use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) can sometimes favor small businesses due to less stringent requirements compared to larger procurements. Further investigation into the contractor's size and any subcontracting plans would be necessary for a comprehensive analysis.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC). As a BPA call, it is a task order against an existing Basic Ordering Agreement, implying that the initial BPA likely underwent some level of review. Accountability measures would include performance monitoring against the contract terms and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, though detailed justifications for SAP awards are not always extensively published.

Related Government Programs

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Operations
Department of Homeland Security Fuel Procurement
Emergency Preparedness and Continuity of Operations Funding
Simplified Acquisition Procedures

Risk Flags

Urgent Need Justification
Simplified Acquisition Procedures Threshold
Firm Fixed Price Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $82,902.94 to J. D. MOORE, INC.. FY26 SURGE TRAINING FUEL, IN ADVANCE OF FUNDING IS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT ACTIVITIES DEEMED EXCEPTED UNDER DHS PROCEDURES RELATING TO A LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS BECAUSE 1) THE ACTIVITY INVOLVES PROTECTION OF LIFE AND/OR PROPERTY; AND 2) A DELAY IN TH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J. D. MOORE, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Law Enforcement Training Center).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $82,902.94.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-03-30. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of J. D. Moore, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly for fuel supply?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that J. D. Moore, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily for fuel and related services. While specific details on the volume and nature of past contracts require deeper analysis, their presence as a supplier suggests a level of established capability. To fully assess their track record, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, any instances of contract disputes or terminations, and their success rate in fulfilling similar requirements. The current award, being a BPA call, implies they were previously vetted and awarded a Basic Ordering Agreement, suggesting a baseline level of trust and capability from the agency's perspective.

How does the pricing of this fuel contract compare to market rates or similar federal awards?

Benchmarking the pricing for this specific contract is challenging without access to detailed market analysis or comparable federal fuel awards for the exact period and location. However, the contract utilizes a firm fixed-price structure, which aims to provide cost certainty. The award was made under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which generally encourage competitive offers for procurements under the simplified threshold. While SAP may not yield the absolute lowest price achievable through full and open competition, it is designed to offer good value while ensuring timely acquisition. The justification for the award cites urgency, suggesting that price was balanced against the need for rapid procurement to avoid disruption.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential fuel price volatility in the market, which could impact the contractor's profitability under a fixed-price agreement, although this risk is largely borne by the contractor. Another risk is the potential for supply chain disruptions affecting fuel delivery, especially given the urgency. Mitigation strategies are inherent in the contract structure: the firm fixed-price nature caps the government's cost exposure. Furthermore, the contract's short duration (six months) limits the period over which price fluctuations or supply issues can significantly impact the program. The agency's justification for the award also implies that contingency planning for fuel supply is part of their operational procedures.

How effective is the 'surge training fuel' requirement in ensuring the continuity of critical DHS activities?

The requirement for 'surge training fuel' is presented as critical for maintaining the continuity of essential activities, specifically those deemed excepted under DHS procedures during a lapse in appropriations. This indicates that the training supported by this fuel is directly linked to functions involving the protection of life and property. The effectiveness hinges on the assumption that this fuel is indispensable for carrying out these specific, high-priority training exercises. If these exercises are indeed crucial for maintaining operational readiness or responding to emergencies, then securing this fuel supply is highly effective in preventing a gap in critical government functions. The urgency cited suggests a direct and immediate link between fuel availability and the execution of these vital activities.

What are the historical spending patterns for fuel at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC)?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for fuel at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) would provide valuable context for this $829,000 award. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to determine if this amount represents an increase, decrease, or is consistent with previous years' expenditures for similar training fuel needs. Factors such as the number of trainees, the types of training conducted, and overall operational tempo at FLETC influence fuel consumption. Understanding past spending could reveal trends in fuel costs, identify periods of unusually high or low demand, and help assess whether the current award is aligned with established budgetary norms or represents a deviation requiring further explanation.

What is the significance of the contract being awarded under 'COMPETED UNDER SAP'?

The designation 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' signifies that the contract was awarded using Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). These procedures are designed for procurements below the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000, though specific agency thresholds may vary slightly or be higher for certain categories). SAP aims to streamline the acquisition process, reduce administrative burden, and encourage competition among a wider range of sources than micro-purchases, while not necessarily requiring the full documentation and processes of larger, sealed-bid procurements. For this contract, valued at approximately $829,000, this designation suggests it might be an exception or that the agency has specific policies allowing SAP for certain types of urgent needs or specific contract vehicles like a BPA call, even if it exceeds the standard SAP threshold. It implies a balance between achieving competition and ensuring timely award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Retail Trade › Fuel Dealers › Fuel Dealers

Product/Service Code: FUELS, LUBRICANTS, OILS, WAXES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 210 PERRY LANE RD, BRUNSWICK, GA, 31525

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $82,903

Exercised Options: $82,903

Current Obligation: $82,903

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70LGLY25AGLB00001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline