FEMA awards $8.16M for Hazard Mitigation Assistance Program integration and support services to CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,163,525 ($8.2M)

Contractor: CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2024-09-29

End Date: 2026-01-31

Contract Duration: 489 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INTEGRATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20472

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $8.2 million to CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION for work described as: HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INTEGRATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract awarded through a broad agency announcement (BAA) call, indicating a focus on research and development or innovative solutions. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not closely managed. 3. The duration of 489 days suggests a need for sustained support in program integration. 4. The awardee, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, has experience in federal contracting, but specific performance on similar programs requires further review. 5. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, suggesting the scope may not have been tailored for smaller entities. 6. The geographic location of the awardee is Washington D.C., which may imply a concentration of federal contracting activity in that region.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $8.16 million over approximately 16 months appears reasonable for specialized consulting services in program integration and support. However, without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar program integration contracts within FEMA or DHS would provide a clearer picture of cost-effectiveness. The Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates vigilant oversight to prevent cost overruns and ensure efficient resource utilization.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific mechanism used was a Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) call, which is typically used for basic and applied research and development. The number of bidders and the evaluation criteria are not detailed in the provided data, but full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and encourages competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions being considered, potentially resulting in better value for the government.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), who will receive enhanced support for their hazard mitigation programs. The services delivered will focus on integrating and supporting hazard mitigation assistance programs, aiming to improve their effectiveness and efficiency. The geographic impact is national, as hazard mitigation programs are relevant across all regions of the United States. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized consultants with expertise in environmental consulting, program management, and federal disaster response.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's potential performance.
The broad nature of 'integration and support services' could lead to scope creep if not clearly defined and monitored.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
The contractor, CDM Federal Programs Corporation, likely possesses relevant experience in federal contracting.
The contract addresses critical hazard mitigation programs, indicating a focus on important national security and resilience objectives.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Consulting Services sector, specifically related to government program support and integration. The broader market for environmental consulting services is substantial, with significant government spending allocated to disaster preparedness, response, and mitigation. This contract represents a portion of FEMA's efforts to enhance its operational capabilities in managing hazard mitigation programs, aligning with national priorities for resilience against natural disasters.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data does not indicate any subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary awardee is likely a larger firm capable of handling the full scope of services. The absence of small business set-asides may limit opportunities for smaller, specialized firms to participate directly in this particular contract, though they might be involved as subcontractors if required by the prime.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) contracting officers and program managers. As a Time and Materials contract, rigorous monitoring of hours, costs, and deliverables will be crucial. Transparency will depend on FEMA's internal reporting and any public-facing information released regarding program performance. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Program
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
Disaster Relief Fund (DRF)

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Scope definition and management are critical for successful integration and support services.
Performance metrics and contractor's past performance on similar projects require further scrutiny.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $8.2 million to CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION. HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INTEGRATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-29. End: 2026-01-31.

What is the track record of CDM Federal Programs Corporation on similar government contracts, particularly those involving program integration and support for disaster management agencies?

CDM Federal Programs Corporation has a history of performing federal contracts, often related to environmental services, engineering, and program management. While specific details on their performance for FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Assistance Program integration are not immediately available in this data snippet, their general experience suggests a capacity to handle complex government projects. A deeper dive into their past performance evaluations, contract history with DHS/FEMA, and client feedback would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and past success in delivering comparable services. This would include examining metrics related to on-time delivery, budget adherence, and quality of work on previous integration and support contracts.

How does the awarded value of $8.16 million compare to similar contracts for hazard mitigation program integration and support services?

Benchmarking the $8.16 million contract value requires comparing it to similar contracts for program integration and support services within the hazard mitigation domain. Factors such as contract duration (489 days), scope of work, and the specific agency (FEMA) are key. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable federal contracts, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for a contract of this duration and specialized nature, the value appears within a reasonable range, assuming the scope of work is substantial. A detailed analysis would involve identifying contracts with similar objectives, service types (e.g., consulting, technical support, program management), and award amounts over comparable periods, ideally within FEMA or other disaster management agencies.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for this type of service, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract is the potential for cost overruns, as the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used, rather than a fixed price. This can be exacerbated if the scope of work is not well-defined or if contractor efficiency is low. For this contract, potential risks include scope creep, inefficient use of consultant time, and unexpected increases in material costs. Mitigation strategies likely employed by FEMA include establishing clear ceilings on total contract value, requiring detailed timesheets and justifications for hours worked, regular progress reviews, and potentially incorporating performance incentives or penalties. Strong contract management and oversight by FEMA personnel are critical to controlling costs and ensuring value.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the effectiveness and efficiency of FEMA's hazard mitigation assistance programs?

This contract is intended to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of FEMA's hazard mitigation assistance programs by providing crucial integration and support services. Effective program integration can lead to better coordination between different mitigation initiatives, improved resource allocation, and streamlined application and approval processes for grants and assistance. Enhanced support services can help FEMA manage these complex programs more effectively, potentially leading to faster delivery of mitigation projects, better risk reduction outcomes, and improved resilience across communities. The success of this contract will depend on the quality of the services provided by CDM Federal Programs Corporation and FEMA's ability to leverage these services to achieve program goals.

How has federal spending on hazard mitigation assistance programs evolved over recent years, and does this contract align with current trends?

Federal spending on hazard mitigation assistance programs has generally seen an upward trend in recent years, driven by increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters and a growing emphasis on climate resilience. Programs like the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program have received significant funding. This $8.16 million contract for integration and support services aligns with this trend by providing resources to enhance the management and delivery of these critical programs. It reflects a commitment to strengthening the operational capacity of FEMA to administer mitigation funds effectively and support communities in reducing disaster risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10306 EATON PL STE 220, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,163,525

Exercised Options: $8,163,525

Current Obligation: $8,163,525

Actual Outlays: $6,520,194

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 6

Total Subaward Amount: $3,373,455

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70FA6023A00000006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline