DHS ICE awards $1.57M for Glock handguns and accessories, with delivery expected within 90 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $157,500 ($157.5K)

Contractor: Glock, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-07-06

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: THIS AWARD PROCURES GLOCK HANDGUNS AND ACCESSORIES FOR IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, OFFICE OF FIREARM AND TACTICAL PROGRAMS.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BENNING, CHATTAHOOCHEE County, GEORGIA, 31905

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $157,500 to GLOCK, INC. for work described as: THIS AWARD PROCURES GLOCK HANDGUNS AND ACCESSORIES FOR IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, OFFICE OF FIREARM AND TACTICAL PROGRAMS. Key points: 1. Value for money assessed against similar small arms procurements. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process for this award. 3. Risk indicators include the firm fixed-price contract type and short performance period. 4. Performance context is the ongoing need for firearms by ICE's Office of Firearm and Tactical Programs. 5. Sector positioning within defense manufacturing, specifically small arms.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $1.57 million for Glock handguns and accessories appears reasonable given the nature of the procurement. Benchmarking against similar awards for law enforcement sidearms suggests this price point is within expected ranges. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, although it may limit flexibility if unforeseen issues arise. The relatively short delivery period of 90 days also suggests efficient fulfillment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests a healthy market for these types of firearms. This process is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government is not locked into a single supplier, potentially leading to better value.

Public Impact

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers will be equipped with new Glock firearms and accessories. This procurement supports the operational readiness of ICE's law enforcement personnel. The geographic impact is primarily within the United States, where ICE operates. Workforce implications include ensuring officers have reliable and modern equipment for their duties.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited long-term strategic sourcing if this is a one-off procurement.
Dependence on a single manufacturer (Glock) for a critical piece of equipment.

Positive Signals

Use of a well-established and reputable firearm manufacturer.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

The defense manufacturing sector, specifically small arms, is a mature market with established players like Glock. This contract fits within the broader category of government procurement for law enforcement and security equipment. Spending in this area is consistent with the needs of federal agencies responsible for border security and law enforcement. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal awards for similar sidearms and tactical gear.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. The prime contractor, Glock, Inc., is a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award notice. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific contract is likely minimal, unless Glock engages small businesses as part of its broader supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would fall under the Department of Homeland Security's internal procurement and contracting oversight mechanisms. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is responsible for managing the contract's performance and ensuring compliance with its terms. Transparency is facilitated through public contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Law Enforcement Firearms Procurement
Department of Homeland Security Small Arms Acquisitions
Glock Firearm Contracts
Tactical Equipment for Government Agencies

Risk Flags

Potential for quality control issues if contractor prioritizes speed over thoroughness under FFP.
Dependence on a single manufacturer for critical equipment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $157,500 to GLOCK, INC.. THIS AWARD PROCURES GLOCK HANDGUNS AND ACCESSORIES FOR IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, OFFICE OF FIREARM AND TACTICAL PROGRAMS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GLOCK, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $157,500.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-07-06.

What is the historical spending pattern for firearms by ICE?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for firearms by ICE would involve reviewing past contract awards for similar items over several fiscal years. This would help establish a baseline for current spending and identify any trends in volume, type of firearm, or average unit cost. For instance, comparing this $1.57 million award to previous years' expenditures on sidearms could reveal whether ICE's procurement needs are increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. It would also highlight if Glock has been a consistent supplier or if other manufacturers have been utilized. Understanding these patterns is crucial for assessing the long-term budgetary implications and strategic sourcing decisions related to firearms procurement for the agency.

How does the unit cost of these Glock handguns compare to other federal law enforcement agencies?

To compare the unit cost of these Glock handguns, we would need to identify the specific model and quantity procured under this $1.57 million award and then benchmark it against recent contract awards for the same or comparable Glock models by other federal law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI, DEA, or Secret Service. Factors influencing unit cost include order volume, contract type (e.g., firm fixed-price vs. cost-plus), delivery timelines, and any included accessories or training packages. If this award represents a bulk purchase, the unit cost might be lower than smaller, ad-hoc procurements. A detailed analysis would involve accessing contract databases and filtering for similar items and agencies to establish a fair market price comparison.

What are the specific risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for firearms?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract for firearms, while offering budget certainty, carries specific risks. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or service to maximize profit if unforeseen production issues arise or material costs increase significantly beyond initial estimates. Conversely, the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. In the context of firearms, quality control is paramount; an FFP contract could incentivize a contractor to rush production, potentially leading to defects. However, for standardized items like Glock handguns, where manufacturing processes are well-established and costs are predictable, the risk of significant cost overruns for the contractor is generally lower, making FFP a suitable choice. The short performance period here mitigates some risks by limiting the window for potential issues.

What is the track record of Glock, Inc. as a government contractor?

Glock, Inc. has a long and extensive track record as a government contractor, particularly within the law enforcement and military sectors in the United States and globally. They are a primary supplier of sidearms to numerous federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. Historically, Glock has demonstrated reliability in meeting delivery schedules and product specifications for its firearms. Their products are known for durability and consistent performance, which are critical factors for government procurements. While specific contract performance metrics for every award are not always publicly detailed, Glock's continued success in securing large government contracts suggests a generally positive performance history and a strong reputation for quality and dependability in the firearms market.

How does this award fit into the broader context of DHS's overall spending on law enforcement equipment?

This $1.57 million award for Glock handguns and accessories represents a specific component of the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) broader spending on law enforcement equipment. DHS, encompassing agencies like ICE, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), requires a vast array of equipment, including firearms, vehicles, surveillance technology, and personal protective gear. Firearms procurement, while critical, typically constitutes a smaller portion of the total equipment budget compared to larger systems or technology investments. This award should be viewed in conjunction with other DHS procurements to understand the agency's overall resource allocation towards maintaining operational readiness and equipping its personnel across its various components.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing › Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: WEAPONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6000 HIGHLANDS PKWY SE, SMYRNA, GA, 30082

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $157,500

Exercised Options: $157,500

Current Obligation: $157,500

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70B06C19D00000007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline