DHS spent $36.9M on charter flights, with Presidential Aviation Inc. securing the contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $36,939,516 ($36.9M)
Contractor: Presidential Aviation, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2023-04-17
End Date: 2024-06-27
Contract Duration: 437 days
Daily Burn Rate: $84.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: CHARTER FLIGHTS
Place of Performance
Location: FORT LAUDERDALE, BROWARD County, FLORIDA, 33309
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $36.9 million to PRESIDENTIAL AVIATION, INC. for work described as: CHARTER FLIGHTS Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the specialized nature of charter flights for critical operations. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, primarily related to the reliance on a single contractor for essential services. 4. Performance context suggests consistent demand for air transportation services by CBP. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader transportation and logistics services for government agencies.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total contract value of $36.9 million for charter flights over approximately 14 months suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking this against similar government charter contracts is challenging due to the variable nature of flight services and specific mission requirements. However, the firm-fixed-price structure indicates that the government has a clear understanding of the total cost, which can be a positive indicator of cost control, assuming the scope of work was well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of four bids suggests a reasonable level of competition for this service. A competitive bidding process is generally expected to drive prices towards market rates and encourage efficiency from the awarded contractor.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing services at the most competitive price available in the market.
Public Impact
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) benefits from reliable and flexible air transportation. Essential services include nonscheduled chartered passenger air transportation, likely for operational support and personnel movement. Geographic impact is primarily within Florida (ST: FL, SN: FLORIDA), supporting CBP operations in that region. Workforce implications involve enabling CBP personnel to conduct their duties effectively through timely transportation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for price increases in future contract renewals if competition diminishes.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical transportation needs could pose a risk if service disruptions occur.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Multiple bidders participated, suggesting a healthy market for these services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader aviation services sector, specifically focusing on chartered air transportation for government entities. The market for government aviation services is specialized, often requiring adherence to strict security and operational protocols. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the unique nature of charter services, which are typically procured for specific, often urgent, mission requirements rather than routine travel.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses. The nature of specialized charter flight services may lend itself to larger, established aviation companies. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed but could potentially exist within the broader operational support or maintenance aspects of the contract, depending on the prime contractor's strategy.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight. The firm-fixed-price nature provides a degree of financial oversight by capping costs. Accountability for service delivery rests with Presidential Aviation, Inc., and performance would be monitored by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards.
Related Government Programs
- Government Charter Flights
- Department of Homeland Security Aviation Services
- CBP Transportation Contracts
- Nonscheduled Air Transportation Services
Risk Flags
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical services.
- Potential for cost escalation in future procurements.
- Service disruption risks inherent in aviation operations.
Tags
transportation, aviation-services, dhs, u.s.-customs-and-border-protection, florida, charter-flights, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, presidential-aviation-inc., nonscheduled-air-transportation
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $36.9 million to PRESIDENTIAL AVIATION, INC.. CHARTER FLIGHTS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PRESIDENTIAL AVIATION, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Customs and Border Protection).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $36.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-04-17. End: 2024-06-27.
What is the track record of Presidential Aviation, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with DHS?
Presidential Aviation, Inc. has a history of securing federal contracts, including those with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Their experience often involves providing specialized aviation services. A review of their contract history would reveal the types of services provided, their performance ratings on past contracts, and any significant issues or accolades. For this specific contract, the award itself suggests they met the requirements set forth in the solicitation. Further analysis would involve examining past performance evaluations and any contract modifications or disputes to fully assess their track record with DHS and other federal agencies.
How does the per-flight cost of these charter services compare to commercial airline fares or other government transportation options?
Directly comparing the per-flight cost of these charter services to commercial airline fares or other government transportation options is complex. Charter flights are typically procured for their flexibility, direct routing, and ability to accommodate specific mission needs (e.g., carrying specialized equipment, personnel to remote locations, or ensuring operational security) that commercial options cannot meet. While commercial flights may have a lower per-seat cost for standard travel, charter services often include the entire aircraft, dedicated flight crews, and operational flexibility, making a direct cost-per-passenger comparison potentially misleading. The value proposition of charter flights lies in mission enablement and operational efficiency rather than pure cost minimization on a per-seat basis.
What are the primary risks associated with relying on charter flights for critical CBP operations?
The primary risks associated with relying on charter flights for critical CBP operations include potential service disruptions due to aircraft maintenance, weather, or crew availability. There's also a risk of price volatility if future contracts face less competition or if fuel costs escalate significantly. Dependence on a single provider, even with multiple bids initially, can create vulnerabilities. Furthermore, ensuring consistent adherence to security protocols and operational requirements across all flights is paramount. The government also bears the risk of scope creep or unforeseen operational demands that could increase costs beyond initial projections, despite the firm-fixed-price structure.
What is the historical spending pattern for nonscheduled chartered passenger air transportation by DHS or CBP?
Historical spending on nonscheduled chartered passenger air transportation by DHS and CBP would likely show a pattern of consistent, albeit variable, expenditure driven by operational needs. Such services are typically procured on an as-needed basis for specific missions, rather than through long-term, high-volume commitments like scheduled airline contracts. Spending can fluctuate based on border security levels, emergency response requirements, and specific enforcement operations. Analyzing past contract awards for similar services would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the number of competing vendors over time, providing context for the current $36.9 million award.
What specific operational requirements necessitate the use of charter flights over other modes of transportation for CBP?
The use of charter flights by CBP is typically necessitated by specific operational requirements that cannot be met by commercial airlines or other modes of transport. These can include the need for rapid deployment of personnel or equipment to remote or unsecured locations, maintaining operational security during transit, transporting sensitive individuals or evidence, or accommodating specific mission profiles that require direct point-to-point travel without layovers. Charter flights offer flexibility in scheduling and routing, allowing CBP to respond effectively to dynamic border security challenges and law enforcement activities where time and operational integrity are critical.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Nonscheduled Air Transportation › Nonscheduled Chartered Passenger Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: TRANSPORT, TRAVEL, RELOCATION › TRANSPORTATION OF THINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 70B03C23Q00000085
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1725 NW 51ST PL, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, 33309
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $36,939,516
Exercised Options: $36,939,516
Current Obligation: $36,939,516
Actual Outlays: $36,939,516
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS33F016BA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-04-17
Current End Date: 2024-06-27
Potential End Date: 2024-06-27 16:11:42
Last Modified: 2024-07-03
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)