Honeywell International Inc. awarded $2.4M for Fire Life Safety Upgrades at Los Angeles ATCT

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,398,685 ($2.4M)

Contractor: Honeywell International Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2026-01-23

End Date: 2026-10-02

Contract Duration: 252 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.5K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: FIRE LIFE SAFETY UPGRADES LOS ANGELES ATCT

Place of Performance

Location: LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90045

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $2.4 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC for work described as: FIRE LIFE SAFETY UPGRADES LOS ANGELES ATCT Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized building upgrades. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially efficient price discovery process. 3. Performance risk appears moderate given the nature of the work. 4. This contract supports critical infrastructure modernization for air traffic control. 5. The project falls within the broader construction and facility maintenance sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.4 million for fire life safety upgrades at an Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) seems aligned with industry standards for such specialized projects. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for facility modernization and safety system installations would provide a more precise value assessment. However, given the scope of upgrading life safety systems in a critical federal facility, the price appears to be within a justifiable range, assuming the scope of work is comprehensive and meets all regulatory requirements.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a competitive process likely involving multiple bids. While specific bidder numbers are not provided, SAP is designed to encourage competition for contracts below certain thresholds. The fact that it was competed suggests that the Federal Aviation Administration sought the best value through a bidding process, which generally leads to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competed contract under SAP generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives competitive pricing and avoids potential overpayment associated with sole-source awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Federal Aviation Administration and the personnel working at the Los Angeles ATCT, ensuring a safer working environment. The services delivered include essential upgrades to fire detection, suppression, and life safety systems. The geographic impact is localized to the Los Angeles metropolitan area, specifically the airport's air traffic control facilities. Workforce implications may include specialized construction and technical labor for installation and integration of the safety systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if unforeseen issues arise during the upgrade process.
Dependence on contractor's ability to meet strict safety and operational timelines.
Risk of disruption to ATCT operations if installation is not carefully managed.

Positive Signals

Focus on critical life safety systems enhances operational resilience.
Use of a firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Contract completion date is well-defined, allowing for planning.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on facility upgrades and maintenance for critical infrastructure. The market for such services is robust, driven by ongoing needs for modernization, safety compliance, and energy efficiency in government and commercial buildings. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal contracts for similar safety system upgrades in airports or other high-security federal facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a competed contract under SAP, there's a possibility that small businesses could have participated, but without specific bidder information, it's difficult to assess their involvement. Subcontracting opportunities may exist, potentially benefiting small businesses in specialized trades, but this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracting officers and technical representatives. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified upgrades. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Control Modernization Programs
General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service Contracts
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Facility Security Upgrades

Risk Flags

Potential for operational disruption during installation.
Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting schedule and cost.
Ensuring full compliance with stringent FAA safety regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $2.4 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. FIRE LIFE SAFETY UPGRADES LOS ANGELES ATCT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-23. End: 2026-10-02.

What is the historical spending pattern for fire life safety upgrades at FAA facilities?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for fire life safety upgrades at FAA facilities requires access to comprehensive contract data over several fiscal years. This would involve querying databases like FPDS-NG or USAspending.gov for contracts with relevant Product Service Codes (PSCs) and keywords related to 'fire safety,' 'life safety,' and 'ATCT upgrades.' Trends might reveal cyclical investments, increases in spending due to aging infrastructure, or responses to specific safety mandates. For instance, a review might show a steady increase in spending over the last decade as older facilities require modernization, or a surge following specific safety incidents or regulatory changes. Understanding these patterns helps in forecasting future needs and budgeting effectively for similar projects across the FAA's portfolio.

How does the awarded price compare to similar fire life safety upgrade contracts for Air Traffic Control Towers?

To compare the awarded price of $2.4 million for the Los Angeles ATCT fire life safety upgrades, one would need to identify comparable contracts. This involves searching for contracts with similar scope (fire detection, suppression, alarm systems), facility type (ATCTs, control towers), and geographic region, while adjusting for inflation and contract duration. For example, a contract for a similar upgrade at a tower in a different region might have been awarded for $2.0 million five years ago. Adjusting for inflation, this would equate to approximately $2.3-$2.4 million today. If the current contract's price is significantly higher or lower than these adjusted benchmarks, it could indicate exceptional value or potential overpricing. Without specific comparable contract data, a definitive assessment is challenging, but the current award appears within a reasonable range for specialized infrastructure work.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will they be measured?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) for this fire life safety upgrade contract would likely focus on adherence to schedule, quality of installation, system functionality, and minimal disruption to ongoing ATCT operations. Specific KPIs could include: 1) On-time completion of milestones and final delivery (measured against the contract schedule, ed: 2026-10-02). 2) System performance meeting all specified technical requirements and regulatory standards (measured through rigorous testing and commissioning). 3) Compliance with safety protocols during installation (monitored through site inspections). 4) Minimizing operational downtime or impact on air traffic control (measured by tracking any unscheduled outages or delays attributed to the construction). These KPIs would be formally outlined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) and monitored by the FAA's technical representatives.

What is Honeywell International Inc.'s track record with similar FAA or critical infrastructure contracts?

Honeywell International Inc. is a large, established corporation with extensive experience in building technologies, including safety and security systems, across various sectors, including aviation and government facilities. Their track record with the FAA and similar critical infrastructure projects would typically involve a review of past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), any past disputes or claims, and the successful completion of previous contracts of similar scope and value. Generally, large companies like Honeywell have a documented history of executing complex projects, though performance can vary. A thorough assessment would involve reviewing specific past FAA contracts to gauge their reliability, technical expertise, and adherence to schedule and budget on similar projects.

What are the potential risks associated with upgrading life safety systems in an operational Air Traffic Control Tower?

Upgrading life safety systems in an operational Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) presents several significant risks. Firstly, there's the risk of disrupting critical air traffic control operations. Any downtime or malfunction during installation could have severe safety implications. Secondly, ensuring the new systems are fully compatible with existing infrastructure and meet stringent FAA regulations is crucial; failure to do so could lead to non-compliance or system failures. Thirdly, managing the physical installation within a secure and potentially confined space requires careful planning to avoid accidents and ensure worker safety. Finally, unforeseen issues discovered during the upgrade process (e.g., asbestos, outdated wiring) could lead to scope creep, cost overruns, and schedule delays. Mitigation strategies typically involve detailed phasing plans, rigorous testing, close coordination with ATCT staff, and robust quality assurance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 345 INVERNECO DR S STE 240, ENGLEWOOD, CO, 80112

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,398,685

Exercised Options: $2,398,685

Current Obligation: $2,398,685

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 697DCK19D00008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline