DOT awards $4.75M contract for siding replacement to Perry & Davis Enterprise LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,500 ($47.5K)

Contractor: Perry & Davis Enterprise LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2025-11-01

End Date: 2026-05-15

Contract Duration: 195 days

Daily Burn Rate: $244/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: SEA ARSR ICE SHIELD

Place of Performance

Location: MEDINA, KING County, WASHINGTON, 98039

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $47,500 to PERRY & DAVIS ENTERPRISE LLC for work described as: SEA ARSR ICE SHIELD Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price competition. 2. The contract duration of 195 days is relatively short for a project of this scale. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty but limits flexibility for unforeseen issues. 4. No small business set-aside was applied, potentially impacting small business participation. 5. The contract is for siding replacement, a common maintenance task for federal facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Without a competitive bidding process, it is difficult to assess if the $4.75 million award represents good value for money. The lack of comparison to other bids or market rates for similar siding replacement projects makes benchmarking challenging. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost predictability, but the absence of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. The specific justification for this approach is not provided, but it means there were no opportunities for multiple vendors to bid on the work. This lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to secure the best possible price and terms.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the most competitive pricing due to the absence of a bidding process. The government missed an opportunity to explore a wider range of solutions and potentially lower costs through open competition.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will benefit from the facility maintenance. The contract will result in the replacement of siding on a federal facility. The geographic impact is limited to the location of the facility in Washington. The contract will likely involve a workforce for construction and installation services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits transparency and potential cost savings.
Lack of competition may lead to higher than market prices.
No small business participation requirements noted.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract is for essential facility maintenance.

Sector Analysis

The construction and maintenance sector for federal facilities is substantial. This contract for siding replacement falls under general building maintenance and repair services. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar projects are difficult to ascertain without competitive data, but large-scale siding projects can range significantly in cost depending on materials, labor, and facility size.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not competed under SAP and does not indicate any small business set-aside. This means that small businesses were not specifically targeted for this procurement. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans, which could limit opportunities for small businesses to participate in this project.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Transportation's internal audit and compliance functions, as well as the Federal Aviation Administration's program management. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
General Services Administration (GSA) Facility Management
Department of Transportation Facility Upgrades

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of competitive bidding
No small business participation noted

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $47,500 to PERRY & DAVIS ENTERPRISE LLC. SEA ARSR ICE SHIELD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERRY & DAVIS ENTERPRISE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47,500.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-01. End: 2026-05-15.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' which typically implies a sole-source award or an exception to full and open competition. Without further documentation or justification from the agency (Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration), the specific reason for not competing this contract remains unclear. Common justifications for sole-source awards include urgent and compelling needs, unique capabilities of a single contractor, or situations where only one responsible source exists. However, for a siding replacement project, it is unusual not to have a competitive process unless there are highly specific and documented circumstances.

How does the $4.75 million cost compare to similar siding replacement projects at federal facilities?

Direct comparison of the $4.75 million cost to similar federal siding replacement projects is challenging without access to a broader dataset of competitively bid contracts for comparable work. The provided data does not include details on the scope of work, square footage of siding to be replaced, materials specified, or labor rates, which are critical for a meaningful benchmark. Given the sole-source nature of this award, it is difficult to ascertain if this price reflects market value or if a competitive process might have yielded a lower cost. Further analysis would require access to historical contract data for similar projects or independent cost estimation.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source contract for facility maintenance?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source contract for facility maintenance, such as this siding replacement project, is the potential for inflated costs due to a lack of price competition. Without multiple bids, the government may not achieve the most economical outcome. Another risk is limited innovation, as a single contractor may not be incentivized to propose the most efficient or cost-effective methods. Furthermore, transparency is reduced, making it harder to justify the expenditure to taxpayers. There's also a risk of contractor complacency if they know they are the only option, potentially impacting quality or schedule adherence, although the fixed-price nature offers some mitigation.

What is the track record of PERRY & DAVIS ENTERPRISE LLC with federal contracts?

Information regarding the track record of PERRY & DAVIS ENTERPRISE LLC with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data snippet. To assess their performance, one would need to review their past federal contract history, including contract values, types, performance ratings (if available), and any past performance issues or awards. Without this historical data, it is difficult to evaluate their reliability, experience, and past success in delivering similar services to government agencies. A comprehensive review would involve searching federal procurement databases for their contract awards and performance evaluations.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the local workforce in Washington?

This contract for siding replacement is expected to have a positive impact on the local workforce in Washington by creating jobs related to construction and skilled trades. The duration of the contract (195 days) suggests a need for a dedicated team of workers for the project's execution. While the specific number of jobs created is not detailed, it would likely involve laborers, carpenters, siding installers, and potentially supervisors. The economic activity generated by this contract would also benefit local suppliers of materials and equipment, further contributing to the regional economy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Foundation, Structure, and Building Exterior Contractors › Siding Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12388 E BATES CIR, AURORA, CO, 80014

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,500

Exercised Options: $47,500

Current Obligation: $47,500

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline