DOT awards $327K contract for landscaping at Boston ARTCC and NH child care facility

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $326,955 ($327.0K)

Contractor: Greenscape Land Design Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2022-05-11

End Date: 2026-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,664 days

Daily Burn Rate: $196/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROVIDE LANDSCAPING SERVICES AT THE BOSTON ARTCC, 11 MURPHY DRIVE AND THE CHILD CARE FACILITY IN NASHUA, NH

Place of Performance

Location: NASHUA, HILLSBOROUGH County, NEW HAMPSHIRE, 03062

State: New Hampshire Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $326,954.81 to GREENSCAPE LAND DESIGN INC for work described as: PROVIDE LANDSCAPING SERVICES AT THE BOSTON ARTCC, 11 MURPHY DRIVE AND THE CHILD CARE FACILITY IN NASHUA, NH Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Greenscape Land Design Inc. for landscaping services. 2. Services to be performed at two distinct locations: Boston ARTCC and a child care facility in Nashua, NH. 3. The contract has a firm fixed price structure, indicating predictable costs. 4. Duration of the contract is 1664 days, spanning from May 2022 to November 2026. 5. This contract was awarded under full and open competition. 6. The contract value is approximately $327,000 over its term.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $327,000 over nearly four and a half years suggests a reasonable annual expenditure for landscaping services at two federal facilities. Benchmarking against similar landscaping contracts for federal facilities of comparable size and scope would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature helps control costs, but the specific scope of services will determine the ultimate value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. With 5 bidders participating, this suggests a healthy level of competition for the landscaping services. This competitive process is expected to drive more favorable pricing and service quality for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by encouraging lower prices and better service offerings from contractors.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) benefits from maintained grounds at the Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC). The child care facility in Nashua, NH, will have its grounds professionally landscaped. The primary geographic impact is localized to Massachusetts and New Hampshire. The contract supports the landscaping services industry, potentially creating or sustaining local jobs in New Hampshire and Massachusetts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial landscaping requirements are not clearly defined.
Seasonal variations in landscaping needs may present challenges in consistent service delivery.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these services.
Long-term contract duration allows for consistent grounds maintenance.

Sector Analysis

The landscaping services sector is characterized by a mix of small, medium, and large businesses. Federal contracts for landscaping are common across various agencies to maintain government properties. This contract fits within the broader category of facilities maintenance and support services, which is a significant segment of the federal procurement market. Comparable spending benchmarks for landscaping services can vary widely based on geographic location, facility size, and the specific services required (e.g., mowing, horticultural care, snow removal).

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside. However, the presence of 5 bidders in a full and open competition suggests that small businesses may have participated. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small businesses were awarded subcontracts or if the prime contractor is a small business itself.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is a firm fixed-price definitive contract, which provides a clear cost structure. Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Federal Aviation Administration to ensure services meet the contract's specifications. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases where contract awards are published.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Facilities Maintenance
General Services Administration Grounds Maintenance Contracts
Department of Defense Base Operations Support

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Contractor performance risk over a long duration.
Environmental factors impacting service delivery.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $326,954.81 to GREENSCAPE LAND DESIGN INC. PROVIDE LANDSCAPING SERVICES AT THE BOSTON ARTCC, 11 MURPHY DRIVE AND THE CHILD CARE FACILITY IN NASHUA, NH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GREENSCAPE LAND DESIGN INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $326,954.81.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-05-11. End: 2026-11-30.

What is the track record of Greenscape Land Design Inc. with federal contracts?

Information regarding Greenscape Land Design Inc.'s specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A thorough review of federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would be necessary to ascertain their past performance, including the types of contracts awarded, their value, duration, and any performance ratings. Understanding their history with similar agencies or contract types would provide insight into their reliability and capability to fulfill the current landscaping services requirement for the FAA.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar landscaping services?

The provided data does not include specific details on the scope of services or the pricing breakdown, making a direct comparison to market rates challenging. However, the total contract value of approximately $327,000 over 1664 days (roughly 4.5 years) averages to about $72,667 per year. This annual figure would need to be benchmarked against prevailing rates for commercial and government landscaping services in the specific geographic areas of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, considering factors like facility size, complexity of terrain, and the range of services (e.g., mowing, trimming, fertilization, pest control, snow removal if applicable).

What are the primary risks associated with this landscaping contract?

Key risks for this contract include potential underestimation of the scope of work, leading to cost overruns if not managed tightly within the firm fixed-price structure. Environmental factors, such as extreme weather conditions, could impact service delivery and potentially lead to delays or increased costs if not adequately planned for. Furthermore, the contractor's ability to maintain consistent quality of service across two distinct locations over a multi-year period is a performance risk. Ensuring compliance with all federal regulations and environmental standards related to landscaping practices also presents a compliance risk.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for this type of service?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for services like landscaping, as it allows the widest possible pool of qualified vendors to submit bids. The fact that five bids were received indicates a competitive market for these services. This competition should drive down prices and encourage contractors to offer high-quality services to win the contract. The effectiveness is further realized if the solicitation clearly defines the required services and evaluation criteria, allowing the government to select the best value proposal, not just the lowest price.

What is the historical spending pattern for landscaping services at the Boston ARTCC?

Historical spending data for landscaping services specifically at the Boston ARTCC is not provided in the current data extract. To analyze historical spending patterns, one would need to access procurement records for the Boston ARTCC over previous contract periods. This would involve identifying previous landscaping contracts, their values, durations, and awarded contractors. Comparing this historical data with the current award can reveal trends in spending, potential increases or decreases in costs, and changes in contractor selection over time.

Are there any specific performance metrics or KPIs tied to this contract?

The provided data does not specify the performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) associated with this contract. Typically, landscaping contracts include detailed specifications outlining the required standards for grounds maintenance, such as mowing frequency and height, trimming standards, weed control, and aesthetic appearance. Performance would likely be monitored by a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) who would conduct site visits and review service reports to ensure compliance with these specifications. The firm fixed-price nature implies that meeting these defined standards is paramount for the contractor to receive full payment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Landscaping Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 697DCK-22-R-00224

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 MAIN ST, TAUNTON, MA, 02780

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $326,955

Exercised Options: $326,955

Current Obligation: $326,955

Actual Outlays: $258,813

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline