Federal Aviation Administration awards $209K contract for electrical modernization in Sanford, FL to Urban Electric, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $209,009 ($209.0K)

Contractor: Urban Electric, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-06-18

Contract Duration: 77 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IIJA AND F&E FUNDED MODERNIZATION INSTALLATION PROJECT(S) AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS IN SANFORD, FL (LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION) SANFORD, FL (FNU)GS 26000718, (FNU)LOC 26002138, (FNU)MALSR 26000717, (OOS)GS 26000719, (OOS)LOC 26000527, (OOS)MALSR 2600072

Place of Performance

Location: SANFORD, SEMINOLE County, FLORIDA, 32771

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $209,009.11 to URBAN ELECTRIC, INC for work described as: IIJA AND F&E FUNDED MODERNIZATION INSTALLATION PROJECT(S) AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS IN SANFORD, FL (LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION) SANFORD, FL (FNU)GS 26000718, (FNU)LOC 26002138, (FNU)MALSR 26000717, (OOS)GS 26000719, (OOS)LOC 26000527, (OOS)MALSR 2600072 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, Urban Electric, Inc., for electrical modernization services. 2. Project duration is 77 days, indicating a focused, short-term scope. 3. The contract is a Delivery Order under a larger agreement, suggesting potential for follow-on work. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 238210 points to specialized electrical contracting services. 5. The contract is firm-fixed-price, providing cost certainty for the government. 6. The project is located in Sanford, Florida, with specific facility identifiers provided.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $209,009.11 for electrical modernization services appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for electrical installation and modernization projects of comparable size and complexity would provide a more definitive assessment of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure helps manage cost risks for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The data does not specify the number of bids received, which would provide further insight into the level of competition. A robust competition typically leads to better pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Federal Aviation Administration facilities in Sanford, FL, which will receive modernized electrical systems. The services delivered include electrical contracting and wiring installation, crucial for infrastructure maintenance and upgrades. The geographic impact is localized to Sanford, Florida, specifically at the identified FAA locations. The contract supports the electrical contracting workforce, potentially creating short-term employment opportunities for skilled tradespeople.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bid count limits assessment of competitive pressure.
Limited information on the specific modernization tasks makes it difficult to gauge technical complexity.
The contract is a delivery order, raising questions about the overall scope and budget of the parent contract.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Project duration is clearly defined.
Specific facility identifiers are provided for clarity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction and infrastructure sector, specifically focusing on electrical contracting. The market for electrical contractors is competitive, with numerous firms capable of performing such work. Federal spending in this area often supports the modernization and maintenance of government facilities, including critical infrastructure like airports. The value of this specific contract is relatively small compared to larger infrastructure projects, but it contributes to the overall federal investment in facility upgrades.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity or that small business participation was not a specific focus of this particular delivery order. Further analysis of the parent contract might reveal broader small business utilization goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Federal Aviation Administration contracting officer and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by establishing a set cost. Transparency is facilitated by the public availability of contract data, though detailed project specifics and performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Facility Modernization Projects
Electrical Infrastructure Upgrades
Government Building Maintenance Contracts
Construction Services for Federal Agencies

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting schedule or cost.
Risk of integration issues with existing electrical infrastructure.
Dependence on timely material procurement and skilled labor availability.
Ensuring full compliance with all safety and electrical codes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $209,009.11 to URBAN ELECTRIC, INC. IIJA AND F&E FUNDED MODERNIZATION INSTALLATION PROJECT(S) AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS IN SANFORD, FL (LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION) SANFORD, FL (FNU)GS 26000718, (FNU)LOC 26002138, (FNU)MALSR 26000717, (OOS)GS 26000719, (OOS)LOC 26000527, (OOS)MALSR 2600072

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URBAN ELECTRIC, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $209,009.11.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-06-18.

What is the track record of Urban Electric, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the FAA?

A review of federal procurement databases would be necessary to fully assess Urban Electric, Inc.'s track record. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations, and any history of disputes or contract modifications. Understanding their experience with similar projects, especially those involving electrical modernization for aviation facilities, would provide insight into their capability and reliability. Without specific historical data on Urban Electric, Inc.'s performance, it is difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond the current award.

How does the awarded price compare to similar electrical modernization projects for federal facilities?

To benchmark the $209,009.11 contract value, one would need to compare it against recent federal contracts for electrical modernization and installation services at facilities of similar size and complexity. Factors such as geographic location (labor costs), specific technical requirements (e.g., type of electrical systems, compliance standards), and project duration (77 days) are crucial for a fair comparison. If similar projects in comparable regions have been awarded for significantly lower or higher amounts, it would indicate whether this contract represents good or questionable value for money. The firm-fixed-price nature helps in comparing the final cost, assuming the scope was fully met.

What are the specific risks associated with this electrical modernization project?

Potential risks for this electrical modernization project include unforeseen site conditions that could impact the installation schedule or costs, although the firm-fixed-price contract aims to mitigate cost overruns. Technical risks could arise from the integration of new electrical systems with existing infrastructure, potentially leading to compatibility issues or performance problems. Delays in material procurement or labor shortages could also impact the project timeline. Furthermore, ensuring compliance with all relevant safety and electrical codes is paramount. The short duration (77 days) also presents a risk of schedule compression if any issues arise.

What is the overall effectiveness of the FAA's approach to modernizing its electrical infrastructure through such contracts?

The effectiveness of the FAA's approach to electrical infrastructure modernization can be assessed by examining the long-term performance and reliability of upgraded systems, the reduction in maintenance costs, and the overall impact on operational efficiency. Contracts like this one, awarded under full and open competition and with a firm-fixed-price structure, are generally designed to be effective by ensuring competitive pricing and cost certainty. However, a comprehensive evaluation would require tracking the performance of these modernized systems over time, comparing the costs and benefits against the initial investment, and analyzing whether the upgrades meet the evolving demands of aviation technology and safety standards.

What has been the historical spending pattern for electrical contracting services by the FAA in Florida?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for electrical contracting services by the FAA in Florida would involve reviewing procurement data over several fiscal years. This would reveal the frequency of such contracts, the average contract values, the primary contractors utilized, and the types of electrical services most commonly procured. Understanding this historical context can help identify trends, assess whether spending has increased or decreased, and determine if this $209K contract is consistent with past investment levels in the region. It could also highlight any shifts in contracting strategies or vendor preferences.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors

Product/Service Code: INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT › INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: SANFORD SITES 03/06/26

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 370 CENTER POINTE CIR STE 1196, ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL, 32701

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $209,009

Exercised Options: $209,009

Current Obligation: $209,009

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 6973GH22D00016

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline