DOT awards $19.3M for Challenger 600 series aircraft maintenance, focusing on base year support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,343,988 ($19.3M)
Contractor: JET Support Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2025-09-12
End Date: 2030-09-14
Contract Duration: 1,828 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FY25 INCREMENTAL FUNDING 6973GH-25-D-00057 TO PROVIDE CHALLENGER 600 SERIES AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE (BASE YEAR).
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73169
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $19.3 million to JET SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: FY25 INCREMENTAL FUNDING 6973GH-25-D-00057 TO PROVIDE CHALLENGER 600 SERIES AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE (BASE YEAR). Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized aviation maintenance services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. No immediate risk indicators identified in the contract award details. 4. Performance period spans over five years, indicating long-term support needs. 5. This contract falls within the broader 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' sector. 6. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The awarded amount of $19.3 million for the base year of aircraft maintenance appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized aviation support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for fleet maintenance of comparable aircraft types would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the pricing has been negotiated to cover all anticipated costs, with the contractor bearing the risk of cost overruns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This process typically leads to competitive pricing and a wider selection of capable contractors. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competition type suggests a robust market for Challenger 600 series maintenance.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.
Public Impact
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) benefits from ensuring the operational readiness of its aircraft fleet. Services delivered include essential maintenance for Challenger 600 series aircraft. The geographic impact is primarily centered around where the FAA operates and maintains these aircraft, likely within the United States. Workforce implications include support for specialized aviation mechanics and technicians.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type aligns cost expectations and shifts risk.
- Contract duration of over five years indicates sustained operational needs.
- Contractor has a track record of providing aviation support services.
Sector Analysis
This contract operates within the aviation services sector, specifically focusing on the maintenance and support of specialized aircraft. The market for such services is characterized by high technical expertise requirements and stringent regulatory oversight. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other government contracts for similar aircraft fleet maintenance, as well as private sector MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) operations for business jets.
Small Business Impact
The contract details do not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. Given the specialized nature of maintaining Challenger 600 series aircraft, it is possible that larger, more specialized firms were the primary bidders. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the scope of this award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Federal Aviation Administration's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver services as specified. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Aircraft Maintenance Services
- Aviation Support Contracts
- Federal Aviation Administration Fleet Management
- Specialized Aircraft Operations
Risk Flags
- Potential for contractor performance degradation over a long contract duration.
- Limited insight into the number of bidders in the full and open competition.
- Need for ongoing benchmarking to ensure continued value for money.
Tags
transportation, federal-aviation-administration, aircraft-maintenance, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, specialized-services, aviation-support, jet-support-services-inc, fy25-funding, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $19.3 million to JET SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.. FY25 INCREMENTAL FUNDING 6973GH-25-D-00057 TO PROVIDE CHALLENGER 600 SERIES AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE (BASE YEAR).
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is JET SUPPORT SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-12. End: 2030-09-14.
What is the historical spending pattern for Challenger 600 series aircraft maintenance by the FAA?
Analyzing historical spending for Challenger 600 series maintenance by the FAA is crucial for understanding cost trends and identifying potential budget fluctuations. Without specific historical data for this exact contract vehicle, we can infer general patterns. Government agencies often maintain fleets of aircraft for various operational needs, including surveillance, transport, and research. The maintenance costs for such fleets are typically significant and can vary year-to-year based on usage, age of the aircraft, and the scope of required repairs. Contracts for specialized aircraft maintenance are often long-term to ensure continuity of operations and can be awarded through competitive bidding processes. Historical data would reveal if the current award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending compared to previous periods for similar services, providing context for the $19.3 million base year award.
How does the firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure impact cost control and risk for this contract?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract structure is designed to provide price certainty for the government and shift cost responsibility to the contractor. Under an FFP agreement, the contractor agrees to perform a specific scope of work for a predetermined price. This means that if the contractor's costs exceed the agreed-upon price, the contractor absorbs the loss. Conversely, if costs are lower than anticipated, the contractor realizes a higher profit. For this Challenger 600 series aircraft maintenance contract, the FFP structure incentivizes Jet Support Services, Inc. to manage its resources efficiently and control costs effectively. It minimizes the risk of cost overruns for the FAA, making budgeting more predictable. However, it also requires a well-defined statement of work to prevent scope creep and ensure the contractor is not incentivized to cut corners on quality to meet the fixed price.
What are the potential risks associated with relying on a single contractor for specialized aircraft maintenance over a multi-year period?
While this contract was awarded through full and open competition, the multi-year duration (base year plus potential options, though only base year funding is detailed) raises questions about long-term reliance on a single contractor, Jet Support Services, Inc. Potential risks include contractor performance degradation over time, increased leverage for the contractor in future negotiations if competition diminishes, and the possibility of unforeseen technical challenges that the contractor may not be equipped to handle, despite initial qualifications. Furthermore, if the contractor experiences financial instability or operational disruptions, it could significantly impact the FAA's ability to maintain its aircraft fleet. Robust oversight, clear performance metrics, and contingency planning are essential to mitigate these risks throughout the contract's life.
Can the FAA benchmark the value of this maintenance contract against industry standards or other government contracts?
Benchmarking the value of this $19.3 million base year contract for Challenger 600 series aircraft maintenance is essential for ensuring the FAA is receiving fair and reasonable pricing. The FAA can compare the per-hour labor rates, parts markups, and overall service costs against similar contracts awarded to other government agencies or even against publicly available rates from private sector MRO providers specializing in this aircraft type. Analyzing the scope of work included in the contract (e.g., scheduled maintenance, unscheduled repairs, parts replacement) and comparing it to the price is also critical. If the contract was awarded through full and open competition, the pricing is likely competitive, but a detailed analysis against benchmarks would confirm if it represents excellent value for money or if there are opportunities for cost savings in future procurements.
What is the significance of the 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' NAICS code for this contract?
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 488190, 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation,' categorizes businesses primarily engaged in providing support services to air transportation, but not operating aircraft themselves. This includes services like airport operations, air traffic control, flight planning, aircraft maintenance and repair, and cargo handling. For this contract, it signifies that the FAA is procuring essential operational support rather than the direct operation of aircraft. This classification helps in understanding the broader industry context, identifying potential competitors, and benchmarking spending against similar support services within the federal government and the private sector. It confirms that Jet Support Services, Inc. is providing specialized maintenance and support functions critical to the FAA's aviation infrastructure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Support Activities for Air Transportation › Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 167 N GREEN ST STE 1300, CHICAGO, IL, 60607
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,343,988
Exercised Options: $19,343,988
Current Obligation: $19,343,988
Actual Outlays: $107,346
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 6973GH25D00057
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-12
Current End Date: 2030-09-14
Potential End Date: 2030-09-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-01
More Contracts from JET Support Services, Inc.
- CF34 Engine Overhaul SN 950849 and 950850. N89 — $5.1M (Department of Transportation)
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)