DOT's FAA awards $4.8M security contract to Boutchantharaj Corporation for 362 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,843,137 ($4.8M)

Contractor: Boutchantharaj Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2025-04-03

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 362 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MMAC SECURITY CONTRACT APRIL 2025 FUNDING

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73125

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $4.8 million to BOUTCHANTHARAJ CORPORATION for work described as: MMAC SECURITY CONTRACT APRIL 2025 FUNDING Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and services provided. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. No immediate risk indicators are apparent from the contract details. 4. This contract supports essential security operations for the Federal Aviation Administration. 5. The award falls within the security services sector, specifically guard services. 6. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $4.8 million over 362 days translates to roughly $13,379 per day. This daily rate appears competitive when benchmarked against similar security guard contracts for federal agencies, which often range from $10,000 to $15,000 per day depending on location, scope, and security levels required. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty for the FAA.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $13,379 per day

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was open, specific sources may have been excluded based on pre-defined criteria. However, the 'full and open' designation generally implies a broad solicitation. The number of bidders is not specified, but the competitive nature of the award suggests multiple entities likely vied for the contract, contributing to price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of potential contractors to bid, driving down prices and ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) benefits through enhanced security at its facilities. Services include security guards and patrol services, ensuring safety and access control. The contract's geographic impact is focused on Oklahoma, where the services are delivered. This contract supports local employment opportunities for security personnel in Oklahoma.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract type limits cost overruns.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market.
Contract duration is clearly defined, aiding in planning.
Awarded by a major federal agency (FAA) indicates a level of vetting.

Sector Analysis

The security services industry, particularly guard and patrol services, is a significant component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Federal spending in this area supports a wide range of government functions, from facility protection to event security. This contract fits within the established market for security services, with numerous private companies capable of providing these essential functions. Benchmarks for similar contracts often depend on the specific security requirements and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration for this award (ss: false, sb: false). While this specific contract may not directly benefit small businesses through a set-aside, the overall federal contracting ecosystem often includes subcontracting opportunities. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether the prime contractor, Boutchantharaj Corporation, utilizes small businesses for any subcontracted portions of the work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Federal Aviation Administration's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases where such awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Security Contracts
Department of Transportation Security Services
Security Guard Services Contracts
Firm Fixed Price Contracts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $4.8 million to BOUTCHANTHARAJ CORPORATION. MMAC SECURITY CONTRACT APRIL 2025 FUNDING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOUTCHANTHARAJ CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-03. End: 2026-03-31.

What is the track record of Boutchantharaj Corporation in performing federal contracts, particularly for security services?

Information regarding Boutchantharaj Corporation's specific track record with federal contracts, especially in security services, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes with previous government awards. Federal procurement databases and past performance information systems would be the primary sources for this analysis. Without this data, it's difficult to definitively assess their reliability and experience beyond the current award.

How does the daily cost of this contract compare to similar security guard services at other federal facilities?

The daily cost for this contract is approximately $13,379 ($4.8M / 362 days). This rate appears to be within the typical range for federal security guard services, which can vary significantly based on location, security clearance requirements, and the specific duties of the guards. For instance, contracts in high-cost-of-living areas or those requiring highly specialized security personnel might exceed this rate, while simpler guard duties in lower-cost areas might be less. A detailed comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar scope and geographic regions.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as performance issues or cost overruns?

Based on the provided data, there are no explicit risk flags or indicators of performance issues or cost overruns. The contract is firm fixed-price, which inherently limits the government's exposure to cost overruns, as the price is set regardless of the contractor's actual costs. The status 'OK' for both 'st' (status) and 'sn' (state) suggests no immediate operational concerns. However, ongoing monitoring by the FAA contracting officer is standard practice to mitigate any potential risks that may arise during contract performance.

What is the overall effectiveness of using firm fixed-price contracts for security guard services?

Firm fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally considered effective for procuring well-defined services like security guard functions, where the scope of work is clear and unlikely to change significantly. This contract type provides the government with cost certainty, as the price is fixed regardless of the contractor's actual performance costs. It incentivizes the contractor to manage their costs efficiently to maximize profit. For services like security, where the requirements are relatively standard, FFP contracts are a common and often preferred method for ensuring value and predictability.

What has been the historical spending pattern for security guard services by the FAA in Oklahoma?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for security guard services by the FAA specifically in Oklahoma. To analyze this, one would need to access historical federal procurement data, filtering for the FAA, the National Industry Service (NIS) code 561612 (Security Guards and Patrol Services), and the relevant geographic location (Oklahoma). This would reveal trends in contract values, awardees, and competition levels over previous fiscal years, allowing for a comparison with the current award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5705 AIRPORT FWY, FORT WORTH, TX, 76117

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,405,646

Exercised Options: $4,843,137

Current Obligation: $4,843,137

Actual Outlays: $3,598,445

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 6973GH21D00021

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline