FAA awards $6.36M training support contract to Booz Allen Hamilton for 3-year duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,361,000 ($6.4M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2023-07-05

End Date: 2026-07-05

Contract Duration: 1,096 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: TORFP 2312 TRAINING SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20591

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $6.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: TORFP 2312 TRAINING SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed closely. 3. Booz Allen Hamilton, a large established contractor, is the awardee. 4. The contract duration is 1096 days, spanning over three years. 5. The award is a delivery order against a larger contract vehicle. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541330 for Engineering Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $6.36 million over three years averages to approximately $2.12 million annually. Without specific performance metrics or comparable training support contracts for the FAA, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates careful oversight to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds and do not escalate unexpectedly. Benchmarking against similar engineering services contracts for training support would provide a clearer picture of whether this pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust competitive environment, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method of competition implies multiple entities vied for this award.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a marketplace where contractors compete on price and quality, aiming to offer the best value. This process helps prevent inflated pricing and encourages efficiency.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential training support services. The services delivered are expected to enhance the capabilities and knowledge of FAA personnel. The contract is geographically focused on the District of Columbia. The contract may have implications for the workforce involved in delivering training and support services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value delivered.
The contract is a delivery order, meaning its value could be part of a larger, potentially more complex contract vehicle.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
Booz Allen Hamilton is a well-established contractor with a significant presence in government services.
The contract duration provides a stable period for service delivery and planning.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to training support. The market for professional services, including engineering and management consulting, is substantial within the federal government. Contracts like this are common as agencies require specialized expertise to support their operations and workforce development. Benchmarking would involve comparing this contract's value and scope to other training and engineering support services procured by federal agencies, particularly within the transportation sector.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and there is no indication of a small business set-aside. This suggests that the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, and subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on Booz Allen Hamilton's internal subcontracting strategy rather than a contractual requirement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officer and the FAA's program management office responsible for training support. As a delivery order against a contract vehicle, the underlying contract likely has established oversight mechanisms. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract is suspected.

Related Government Programs

FAA Training Programs
Federal Aviation Administration Operations
Engineering and Management Support Services
Government Training Contracts
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
Delivery order against a larger contract vehicle may obscure full scope and value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $6.4 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. TORFP 2312 TRAINING SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-07-05. End: 2026-07-05.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with the FAA and other federal agencies for similar training support contracts?

Booz Allen Hamilton is a large, well-established government contractor with extensive experience across various federal agencies, including the Department of Transportation and its sub-agencies like the FAA. They have a history of providing a wide range of professional services, including management consulting, IT support, and program management, which often encompass training development and delivery. While specific data on their past performance solely on FAA training support contracts requires deeper analysis of contract databases, their overall profile suggests a capacity to handle such requirements. A review of past performance evaluations and any past disputes or contract terminations would offer a more granular understanding of their reliability and effectiveness in similar roles.

How does the $6.36 million contract value compare to similar training support contracts awarded by the FAA or other transportation agencies?

Benchmarking the $6.36 million contract value requires comparing it against similar training support services procured by the FAA or other Department of Transportation agencies over comparable timeframes. The average annual value of this contract is approximately $2.12 million. To assess value, one would need to identify contracts with similar scopes of work, such as developing training materials, delivering training sessions, and providing logistical support for technical or operational training. Factors like the number of personnel to be trained, the complexity of the subject matter, and the required expertise (e.g., engineering services) would influence pricing. Without access to a detailed comparative analysis of specific contract line items and performance outcomes, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent, fair, or questionable value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to measure the success of this training support contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics established for this contract. Typically, for training support services, KPIs might include trainee satisfaction scores, knowledge retention rates (measured through post-training assessments), successful completion rates, adherence to training schedules, and the effectiveness of training in improving job performance or operational efficiency. The Time and Materials (T&M) nature of the contract suggests that performance monitoring will be crucial to ensure that labor hours and material costs are justified by tangible outcomes. The FAA's program office would be responsible for defining and tracking these metrics throughout the contract's duration.

What is the potential risk associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this training support service?

The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract type, such as this one, is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified hourly rates and for the actual cost of materials. If not managed diligently, contractors may bill for excessive hours or inefficient work, leading to costs exceeding initial estimates or budgets. For this $6.36 million contract, the FAA must implement robust oversight, including detailed review of timesheets, verification of materials used, and close monitoring of progress against defined objectives to mitigate these risks and ensure cost-effectiveness.

How does this contract fit into the broader context of the FAA's efforts to modernize or improve its training infrastructure?

This contract for training support likely plays a role in the FAA's ongoing efforts to ensure its workforce possesses the necessary skills and knowledge to manage and operate the nation's air traffic system, especially in light of technological advancements and evolving safety standards. Modernization efforts within the FAA often involve updating training curricula, adopting new training technologies (like simulation or e-learning), and ensuring personnel are proficient in new systems (e.g., NextGen air traffic control). This contract could be supporting the development or delivery of such modernized training programs, contributing to the agency's overall goal of maintaining a highly skilled and adaptable workforce.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,417,819

Exercised Options: $6,361,000

Current Obligation: $6,361,000

Actual Outlays: $5,204,290

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $649,183

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 693KA822D00029

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline