DOT Awards $2.58M Contract to Chirality Capital Consulting for Infrastructure Bill Support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,580,802 ($2.6M)

Contractor: Chirality Capital Consulting, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2021-09-29

End Date: 2027-01-28

Contract Duration: 1,947 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUISITION IS TO SUPPORT THE AGENCY AND THE INCREASE IN WORK DUE TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE BILL.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20590

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $2.6 million to CHIRALITY CAPITAL CONSULTING, LLC for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUISITION IS TO SUPPORT THE AGENCY AND THE INCREASE IN WORK DUE TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE BILL. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Chirality Capital Consulting, LLC for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Funding is tied to increased workload from the Infrastructure Bill, indicating a potential surge in government needs. 3. The contract is a definitive contract with a firm fixed price, awarded as not competed. 4. The duration is 1947 days, spanning from September 29, 2021, to January 28, 2027. 5. The contract is not set aside for small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $2.58 million over nearly five years for consulting services needs further scrutiny. Benchmarking against similar administrative management contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the duration and value suggest a significant investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, raising concerns about price discovery and whether the government secured the best possible value. A sole-source award limits opportunities for other qualified firms and may lead to higher costs than a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these consulting services.

Public Impact

Increased administrative support for the Department of Transportation due to the Infrastructure Bill. Potential for other agencies to seek similar consulting services to manage increased workloads. Focus on management consulting services, which can impact efficiency and strategic direction. Long contract duration suggests ongoing, critical support needs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Long contract duration
Sole-source award

Positive Signals

Supports critical infrastructure initiative
Firm fixed price contract

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611). Spending in this sector often fluctuates with government initiatives and economic conditions. The Infrastructure Bill likely drives increased demand for such services across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, meaning opportunities were not specifically reserved for smaller entities. This could indicate that the scope of work or the specific requirements favored larger, established firms.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure the services provided are necessary, effective, and priced appropriately. Accountability for the use of funds, especially in relation to the Infrastructure Bill's objectives, is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Department of Transportation Contracting
Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition may lead to inflated costs.
Sole-source award limits transparency and potential for better value.
Long contract duration without clear performance metrics raises concerns about ongoing necessity and effectiveness.
No small business set-aside may indicate missed opportunities for economic development.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $2.6 million to CHIRALITY CAPITAL CONSULTING, LLC. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUISITION IS TO SUPPORT THE AGENCY AND THE INCREASE IN WORK DUE TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE BILL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHIRALITY CAPITAL CONSULTING, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-29. End: 2027-01-28.

What specific services does Chirality Capital Consulting provide under this contract, and how do they directly support the Infrastructure Bill's objectives?

The provided data indicates the purpose is to support the agency and increased work due to the Infrastructure Bill, under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. However, the specific deliverables, tasks, and metrics for success are not detailed. Understanding these specifics is crucial to assess the value and effectiveness of the contract in achieving the bill's goals and justifying the $2.58 million expenditure.

Given the sole-source award, what steps were taken to ensure the price is fair and reasonable for the services rendered?

As the contract was not competed, it is essential to understand the government's process for determining price reasonableness. This typically involves obtaining cost or pricing data from the contractor, conducting audits, and comparing proposed prices to historical data or market research for similar services. Without this information, the fairness of the $2.58 million price remains questionable.

How will the effectiveness of Chirality Capital Consulting's support be measured to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently towards the Infrastructure Bill's success?

Measuring effectiveness requires clearly defined performance metrics and deliverables tied to the contract's objectives. For a contract supporting the Infrastructure Bill, metrics could include project management efficiency improvements, successful navigation of regulatory processes, or timely support for key initiatives. Regular performance reviews and reporting are necessary to ensure accountability and efficient use of the $2.58 million.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3811 DEEP HOLLOW WAY, BOWIE, MD, 20721

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,409,731

Exercised Options: $3,409,731

Current Obligation: $2,580,802

Actual Outlays: $2,374,093

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline