Delon Hampton & Associates to provide project management oversight for MTA's ADA Accessibility Project, valued at $2.2M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,219,519 ($2.2M)

Contractor: Delon Hampton & Associates, Chartered

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2025-04-22

End Date: 2030-02-21

Contract Duration: 1,766 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Transportation

Official Description: DELON HAMPTON & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED WILL PROVIDE FTA REGION II WITH PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT SERVICES FOR THE NEW YORK (NY) METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MTA) & THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) ACCESSIBILITY PROJECT.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $2.2 million to DELON HAMPTON & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED for work described as: DELON HAMPTON & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED WILL PROVIDE FTA REGION II WITH PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT SERVICES FOR THE NEW YORK (NY) METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MTA) & THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) ACCESSIBILITY PROJECT. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on critical project management oversight for accessibility improvements, aligning with federal mandates. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. The contract duration of nearly five years indicates a long-term need for these specialized services. 4. The administrative management and general management consulting services category is broad, requiring specific performance metrics to assess value. 5. Oversight of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority's ADA project is a significant undertaking with public safety implications.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific task breakdowns and comparable project management oversight contracts. The cost-plus-fixed-fee structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. However, the fixed fee component provides some cost certainty for the contractor's services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified firms had the opportunity to bid. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that aims to secure the best value for public funds allocated to essential infrastructure projects.

Public Impact

Transit riders, particularly those with disabilities, will benefit from improved accessibility at MTA facilities. The project aims to enhance compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) across the New York metropolitan area. The contract supports the modernization and upgrade of critical public transportation infrastructure. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized project managers and oversight personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost creep in cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts if scope is not meticulously managed.
Complexity of managing a large-scale transportation project requires robust oversight to ensure timely and budget-conscious completion.

Positive Signals

Focus on ADA compliance addresses a critical need for equitable access to public transportation.
Long-term contract duration suggests a stable and ongoing need for these essential services.
Full and open competition is a positive indicator for achieving competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. The market for such services is large and competitive, with many firms offering specialized expertise in project management for large infrastructure projects. The value of this contract is modest compared to the overall spending in transportation infrastructure consulting.

Small Business Impact

The contract does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. Given the nature of project management oversight for a large transportation authority, it is likely that larger, more established firms would be primary bidders. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may arise depending on the specific needs identified during the project's execution.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be conducted by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) program managers, with potential involvement from the Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General. Transparency will depend on the reporting requirements stipulated in the contract and the FTA's public disclosure policies regarding project progress and expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Grants
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance Programs
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Capital Improvement Projects

Risk Flags

Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
Long contract duration increases exposure to potential scope changes or unforeseen issues.
Complexity of managing accessibility projects for a large transit authority presents inherent risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $2.2 million to DELON HAMPTON & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED. DELON HAMPTON & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED WILL PROVIDE FTA REGION II WITH PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT SERVICES FOR THE NEW YORK (NY) METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (MTA) & THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) ACCESSIBILITY PROJECT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELON HAMPTON & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Transit Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-22. End: 2030-02-21.

What is the track record of Delon Hampton & Associates, Chartered in managing similar large-scale transportation infrastructure projects?

Delon Hampton & Associates, Chartered has a history of providing program and construction management services for large infrastructure projects. Their experience often includes oversight for transportation agencies and public works. Specific details on their past performance on ADA-related projects or projects of similar scale and complexity to the MTA's would require a deeper dive into their contract history and client feedback. The firm's longevity suggests a capacity to handle complex engagements, but the success metrics for this specific contract will be crucial for evaluating their performance.

How does the $2.2 million contract value compare to typical project management oversight costs for similar ADA accessibility projects?

Comparing the $2.2 million contract value requires understanding the scope and duration of the oversight services. ADA accessibility projects can vary significantly in complexity and cost depending on the number of facilities, the extent of renovations needed, and the specific accessibility features to be implemented. For a project spanning nearly five years, $2.2 million for project management oversight might be considered moderate, especially if it covers comprehensive services like planning, scheduling, cost control, quality assurance, and stakeholder coordination for a large transit authority like the MTA. Benchmarking would ideally involve looking at contracts for similar oversight roles on large transit capital improvement programs.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns due to the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure, delays in project execution impacting accessibility timelines, and scope creep. Mitigation strategies likely involve stringent contract management by the FTA, clear definition and monitoring of project milestones, robust reporting requirements from Delon Hampton & Associates, and proactive risk identification and management processes. The long duration also presents a risk of changing regulatory requirements or unforeseen site conditions that would need adaptive management.

How effective is the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in overseeing contracts of this nature to ensure value for taxpayers?

The FTA employs program managers and contract specialists to oversee its portfolio of grants and contracts, including project management services. Their effectiveness is generally gauged by the successful completion of projects within budget and schedule, and adherence to federal regulations and performance standards. The FTA's oversight mechanisms typically include regular progress reports, site visits, and financial reviews. However, the effectiveness can vary based on agency resources, the complexity of the project, and the contractor's performance. Independent audits and Inspector General reviews also play a role in ensuring accountability.

What is the historical spending pattern for project management oversight services by the Department of Transportation or its agencies?

The Department of Transportation (DOT) and its various agencies, such as the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), consistently spend significant amounts on project management and oversight services for large infrastructure projects. This spending is driven by the need for expert support in managing complex construction, modernization, and accessibility initiatives across various transportation modes. Historical data would show a substantial and ongoing investment in these services, often awarded through competitive procurements to specialized consulting firms. The exact patterns fluctuate based on the capital investment cycles and specific program priorities of the DOT.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 900 7TH ST NW STE 800, WASHINGTON, DC, 20001

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,367,086

Exercised Options: $5,367,086

Current Obligation: $2,219,519

Actual Outlays: $969,226

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 69319524D000008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline