EPA Awards $24.5M for Woolfolk Chemical Site Remediation to Kemron

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,513,546 ($24.5M)

Contractor: Kemron Environment Services, I

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2004-09-29

End Date: 2008-03-20

Contract Duration: 1,268 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.3K/day

Competition Type: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: TO BEGIN REMEDIAL ACTION IN OPERABLE UNITS 3 AND 4 AT THE WOOLFOLK CHEMICAL SITE, LOCATED IN FORT VALLEY, GA.

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30318

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $24.5 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENT SERVICES, I for work described as: TO BEGIN REMEDIAL ACTION IN OPERABLE UNITS 3 AND 4 AT THE WOOLFOLK CHEMICAL SITE, LOCATED IN FORT VALLEY, GA. Key points: 1. Significant investment in environmental cleanup for Operable Units 3 and 4. 2. Sole-source award to Kemron raises questions about competition and price discovery. 3. Long project duration (1268 days) suggests complex remediation challenges. 4. Focus on waste management services highlights a critical environmental sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The award was a non-competitive delivery order, making a direct pricing comparison difficult. Without competitive bids, it's challenging to assess if the $24.5 million represents optimal value for the services rendered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This was a non-competitive delivery order, meaning no other vendors were considered. This lack of competition limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award means taxpayers may not have received the benefit of competitive pricing, potentially leading to an overpayment for the services.

Public Impact

Addresses environmental contamination at a former chemical site. Remediation efforts aim to protect public health and local ecosystems. Long-term project impacts the local community and environment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under environmental services, specifically waste management and remediation. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address legacy pollution sites.

Small Business Impact

No information is available regarding small business participation in this contract. The sole-source nature of the award may have precluded opportunities for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which has oversight responsibilities for environmental cleanup contracts. The non-competitive nature warrants scrutiny to ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

all-other-miscellaneous-waste-management, environmental-protection-agency, ga, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $24.5 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENT SERVICES, I. TO BEGIN REMEDIAL ACTION IN OPERABLE UNITS 3 AND 4 AT THE WOOLFOLK CHEMICAL SITE, LOCATED IN FORT VALLEY, GA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KEMRON ENVIRONMENT SERVICES, I.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-29. End: 2008-03-20.

Was a justification provided for the sole-source award, and did it adequately consider alternatives?

The data indicates a 'NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER,' suggesting a sole-source award. A thorough review would require access to the contract file to determine if a formal justification was documented and if alternative procurement methods were explored before this decision was made.

What are the key risks associated with a time and materials contract for environmental remediation?

Time and materials contracts carry inherent risks of cost escalation, as the final price is not fixed. For environmental remediation, this can be exacerbated by unforeseen site conditions, leading to extended timelines and increased labor and material expenses, potentially exceeding initial estimates.

How effectively has the EPA managed similar long-duration, high-value environmental remediation projects in the past?

Assessing the EPA's effectiveness requires analyzing historical data on similar projects, focusing on cost performance, schedule adherence, and environmental outcomes. Benchmarking this project against past EPA performance would provide insight into potential management strengths or weaknesses.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesAll Other Miscellaneous Waste Management Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Address: 1300 SPRING ST NW, ATLANTA, GA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,513,546

Exercised Options: $24,513,546

Current Obligation: $24,513,546

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68S40205

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-09-29

Current End Date: 2008-03-20

Potential End Date: 2008-03-20 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-06-05

Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts

View all Environmental Protection Agency contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending