EPA Awards $4.39M for Broadway Street Corridor Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site Remediation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,390,521 ($4.4M)

Contractor: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2024-09-25

End Date: 2028-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,374 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: BROADWAY STREET CORRIDOR GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SUPERFUND SITE (C5T3): R5, SFGLAES, SEMD, EA EST. INC., RI/FS TO

Place of Performance

Location: ANDERSON, MADISON County, INDIANA, 46012

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $4.4 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC for work described as: BROADWAY STREET CORRIDOR GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SUPERFUND SITE (C5T3): R5, SFGLAES, SEMD, EA EST. INC., RI/FS TO Key points: 1. Contract awarded to EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc., PBC for Superfund site remediation. 2. Project focuses on groundwater contamination at the Broadway Street Corridor site in Indiana. 3. Funding allocated for Remediation Services, indicating a focus on cleanup activities. 4. The contract duration is approximately 4.5 years, suggesting a significant scope of work.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $4.39M for a multi-year remediation project appears reasonable. However, without specific per-unit cost data or detailed task breakdowns, a precise value assessment is difficult. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental cleanup contracts would be beneficial.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which suggests a limited competition. This method may impact price discovery, potentially leading to higher costs than a truly open competition. Further details on the exclusion justification are needed.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for environmental remediation, which is a necessary public service. The cost-effectiveness of the chosen competition method will influence the ultimate taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Addresses significant environmental contamination impacting local groundwater. Potential for improved public health and ecosystem recovery in the affected area. Long-term commitment to site cleanup demonstrates federal responsibility. Economic implications for the local community through remediation activities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition raises concerns about optimal pricing.
Lack of detailed cost breakdown hinders value assessment.
Potential for scope creep in long-term remediation projects.

Positive Signals

Addresses critical environmental contamination.
Long project duration allows for thorough cleanup.
Awarded by a relevant federal agency (EPA).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation sector, specifically focusing on Superfund sites. Spending in this area is driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address legacy pollution. Benchmarks for similar large-scale remediation projects are highly variable based on site complexity and cleanup technology.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded to a small business. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the provided data, which could be a missed opportunity for economic inclusion.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the awarding and contracting agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the 'limited' competition aspect warrants closer scrutiny to ensure accountability and prevent potential inefficiencies.

Related Government Programs

Remediation Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition may result in suboptimal pricing.
Time and Materials contract type increases cost overrun risk.
Lack of small business participation.
Complexity of Superfund site remediation can lead to unforeseen challenges.
Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $4.4 million to EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC. BROADWAY STREET CORRIDOR GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION SUPERFUND SITE (C5T3): R5, SFGLAES, SEMD, EA EST. INC., RI/FS TO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC., PBC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-25. End: 2028-06-30.

What specific factors led to the exclusion of sources in this 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award, and how were these justified?

The justification for excluding sources typically involves technical expertise, specialized equipment, or unique qualifications required for the specific project. For this Superfund site remediation, the EPA likely determined that only a limited number of contractors possessed the necessary experience and capabilities to effectively address the complex groundwater contamination. A thorough review of the administrative record would reveal the precise rationale and evidence supporting this decision.

How does the Time and Materials pricing structure align with ensuring cost-effectiveness for this remediation project?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts can be efficient for projects with uncertain scope, allowing flexibility. However, they carry a higher risk of cost overruns if not closely monitored. For this remediation, the EPA must implement rigorous oversight, detailed progress tracking, and clear task definitions to ensure the T&M approach remains cost-effective and taxpayers receive good value for the funds expended.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) being used to measure the success and effectiveness of the remediation efforts under this contract?

Effective measurement of remediation success requires clearly defined KPIs tied to environmental outcomes. These could include reduction targets for specific contaminants in groundwater, successful containment of the plume, restoration of ecological functions, and compliance with regulatory standards. Regular reporting and independent verification of these KPIs by the EPA are crucial for assessing the project's effectiveness and ensuring accountability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 68HE0524R0012

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 225 SCHILLING CIRCLE, HUNT VALLEY, MD, 21031

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,113,665

Exercised Options: $4,390,521

Current Obligation: $4,390,521

Actual Outlays: $1,361,800

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0523D0006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline