CPSC awards $718K for data collection on product-related injuries to Richmond Medical Center

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $71,843 ($71.8K)

Contractor: Richmond Medical Center

Awarding Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission

Start Date: 2024-06-26

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 734 days

Daily Burn Rate: $98/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DATA COLLECTION ON CONSUMER PRODUCT RELATED INJURIES.

Place of Performance

Location: STATEN ISLAND, RICHMOND County, NEW YORK, 10310

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Consumer Product Safety Commission obligated $71,843 to RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER for work described as: DATA COLLECTION ON CONSUMER PRODUCT RELATED INJURIES. Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the specialized nature of data collection and analysis. 2. Limited competition may have impacted pricing, suggesting potential for higher costs than a fully competed contract. 3. The contract's duration and scope indicate a moderate level of performance risk. 4. This contract supports the CPSC's mission to protect consumers from product-related hazards. 5. The service falls within the IT and data services sector, supporting critical government functions.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $718,430 over approximately two years for data collection and analysis is within a reasonable range for specialized services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for injury data analysis is challenging without more specific details on the scope and methodology. However, the price appears to be in line with the expected costs for collecting, processing, and analyzing sensitive consumer data for a federal agency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor was solicited. This approach is typically used when specific capabilities or circumstances justify bypassing full and open competition. The lack of multiple bidders means there was no direct price comparison or negotiation driven by competitive pressure, which could lead to less favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can result in higher costs for taxpayers as the government does not benefit from the price reductions typically achieved through competitive bidding processes.

Public Impact

Consumers benefit from improved data on product-related injuries, aiding the CPSC in identifying and mitigating safety risks. The CPSC receives crucial data to inform its regulatory and educational initiatives. The geographic impact is national, as data collected will inform safety standards and recalls affecting products sold across the United States. Workforce implications are primarily within the contractor's organization, involving data analysts and researchers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for overpayment due to sole-source award and lack of competitive pressure.
Risk of data quality issues if contractor's analytical capabilities are not rigorously monitored.
Dependency on a single contractor for critical data collection could pose a continuity risk.

Positive Signals

Supports a vital public safety mission of the CPSC.
Contract is for a defined period, limiting long-term commitment.
Clear deliverables are expected for the data collection and analysis.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the broader IT and data services sector, specifically focusing on data collection, processing, and analysis. This sector is characterized by a wide range of service providers, from large cloud hosting companies to specialized data analytics firms. Government spending in this area supports various functions, including research, intelligence, and operational support. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without knowing the precise data sources and analytical methodologies required.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside. There is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Richmond Medical Center, a single entity, suggests it is not structured to prioritize small business participation in this specific procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures will be tied to the contract's performance work statement, requiring the contractor to meet specific data collection and reporting milestones. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though the detailed methodologies and raw data may be proprietary.

Related Government Programs

Consumer Product Safety Commission Data Analytics
Public Health Data Collection Services
Injury Surveillance Systems
Federal Data Processing Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award may limit price competition.
Potential for data quality issues if not rigorously monitored.
Contract duration and scope require careful performance management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Consumer Product Safety Commission awarded $71,843 to RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER. DATA COLLECTION ON CONSUMER PRODUCT RELATED INJURIES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $71,843.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-06-26. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Richmond Medical Center in handling federal data collection contracts?

Information regarding Richmond Medical Center's specific track record with federal data collection contracts is not readily available in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes with similar government engagements. Without this historical data, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability and expertise in managing federal data collection projects. Further due diligence would be necessary to understand their experience with data privacy, security protocols, and reporting requirements pertinent to federal agencies.

How does the $718,430 contract value compare to similar CPSC data collection efforts?

Direct comparison of the $718,430 contract value to similar Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) data collection efforts is challenging without detailed scope and methodology information for other contracts. However, the amount suggests a significant undertaking, likely involving extensive data sourcing, cleaning, analysis, and reporting over the contract's two-year period. If this contract is for a novel data stream or requires specialized analytical tools and expertise, the cost may be justified. Conversely, if it replicates existing data collection processes, the value might warrant closer scrutiny, especially given the sole-source nature of the award.

What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source data collection contract?

The primary risks associated with this sole-source contract include potential overpayment due to the lack of competitive bidding, which limits price negotiation leverage for the government. There's also a risk related to contractor performance; if Richmond Medical Center fails to deliver high-quality data or meet reporting deadlines, it could impede the CPSC's ability to identify and address product safety issues effectively. Furthermore, a sole-source award can create vendor lock-in, making it difficult and potentially costly to switch providers in the future if performance issues arise or if market conditions change, offering less flexibility for the agency.

How effective is the CPSC in utilizing data from contracts like this to improve consumer product safety?

The effectiveness of the CPSC in utilizing data from contracts like this is central to its mission of protecting consumers. Contracts for data collection and analysis are crucial for identifying emerging product hazards, understanding injury trends, and informing regulatory actions, recalls, and consumer education campaigns. The CPSC's historical success in reducing product-related injuries and deaths suggests a generally effective utilization of such data. However, the impact of any single contract depends on the quality of the data provided, the rigor of the analysis, and the agency's capacity to translate findings into actionable safety measures.

What are the historical spending patterns for data collection and analysis by the CPSC?

Historical spending patterns for data collection and analysis by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) would typically show a consistent investment in acquiring and processing data related to consumer product incidents. This spending is essential for the agency's core functions of hazard identification, risk assessment, and standard development. While specific figures for past years are not provided here, it's reasonable to assume that the CPSC allocates significant resources to data-related services, potentially through various contract types and durations, reflecting the ongoing need for up-to-date information on product safety.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 21131-24-0000

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 355 BARD AVE, STATEN ISLAND, NY, 10310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Hospital, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $267,911

Exercised Options: $71,843

Current Obligation: $71,843

Actual Outlays: $58,103

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline