GSA awards $10,169 for 45 days of 600 grit silicon carbide sandpaper to LYEV, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,169 ($10.2K)

Contractor: Lyev, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-05-23

Contract Duration: 45 days

Daily Burn Rate: $226/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PAPER, ABRASIVE, SILICON CARBIDE, 600 GRIT, A-WEIGHT PAPER BACKING, WATERPROOF, PLAIN, FLAT SHEETS, 9.00 INCH WIDTH, 11.00 INCH LENGTH

Place of Performance

Location: ROSEVILLE, MACOMB County, MICHIGAN, 48066

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $10,168.9 to LYEV, LLC for work described as: PAPER, ABRASIVE, SILICON CARBIDE, 600 GRIT, A-WEIGHT PAPER BACKING, WATERPROOF, PLAIN, FLAT SHEETS, 9.00 INCH WIDTH, 11.00 INCH LENGTH Key points: 1. Low dollar value purchase for a common commodity. 2. No competition reported, raising questions about price discovery. 3. Risk of overpayment due to lack of competitive bidding. 4. Sector: Manufacturing supplies, a mature market with established pricing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Pricing is difficult to assess without competitive data. The unit price is unknown, but the total award is small, suggesting it may not be excessively high.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This purchase was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). The lack of competition limits the government's ability to ensure the best possible price.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are used for this purchase. Without competition, there's a risk of paying more than necessary for the sandpaper.

Public Impact

Government procurement of basic supplies impacts various agencies needing maintenance materials. Ensuring fair pricing for common goods is crucial for efficient use of taxpayer money. Transparency in procurement, even for small purchases, builds public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 20 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Unknown unit price
Short contract duration

Positive Signals

Small purchase amount
Use of a common commodity

Sector Analysis

This purchase falls within the manufacturing supplies sector, specifically related to abrasives. Spending benchmarks for such items are generally low due to widespread availability and competition in the commercial market.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were solicited or had an opportunity to bid.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for this procurement. Oversight should ensure that even non-competed small purchases adhere to procurement regulations and best practices.

Related Government Programs

Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpayment
No justification for sole-source provided
Unknown unit price

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $10,168.9 to LYEV, LLC. PAPER, ABRASIVE, SILICON CARBIDE, 600 GRIT, A-WEIGHT PAPER BACKING, WATERPROOF, PLAIN, FLAT SHEETS, 9.00 INCH WIDTH, 11.00 INCH LENGTH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LYEV, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10,168.9.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-05-23.

What is the per-unit cost of the sandpaper, and how does it compare to market rates?

The provided data does not specify the quantity of sheets purchased, making it impossible to calculate a per-unit cost. Without this, a direct comparison to market rates for 600 grit, 9x11 inch waterproof silicon carbide sandpaper is not feasible. Further details on the quantity are needed for a proper value assessment.

What is the justification for not competing this purchase under SAP, and what risks does this pose?

The justification for not competing under SAP is not provided. This lack of competition poses a risk of the government overpaying for the sandpaper, as there was no market pressure to drive down the price. It also limits transparency and the opportunity for other vendors to supply the needed material.

How effectively does GSA ensure fair pricing for common commodities acquired through non-competed actions?

GSA's effectiveness in ensuring fair pricing for non-competed common commodities relies heavily on internal policies and vendor accountability. While small purchases may have less stringent competition requirements, robust internal checks and reliance on established commercial pricing are crucial. The absence of competition here suggests a potential gap in ensuring optimal value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing › Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 20815 KRAFT BLVD, ROSEVILLE, MI, 48066

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,169

Exercised Options: $10,169

Current Obligation: $10,169

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline