GSA awards $21.2K for flat top desks to TBM MERCHANT LLC, a purchase order under SAP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,210 ($21.2K)

Contractor: TBM Merchant LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-06-02

Contract Duration: 55 days

Daily Burn Rate: $386/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 7110001491625 FLAT TOP DESK

Place of Performance

Location: CUMMING, FORSYTH County, GEORGIA, 30041

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $21,210.24 to TBM MERCHANT LLC for work described as: 7110001491625 FLAT TOP DESK Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the unit price for office furniture. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a purchase order under simplified acquisition procedures, suggesting potential for less robust competition. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the small contract value and standard office supply nature. 4. Performance context is a short-term delivery of furniture, with a fixed price contract. 5. Sector positioning is within the General Services Administration's procurement of office furnishings.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $21,210.24 for flat top desks appears to be within a reasonable range for federal procurement of office furniture. Without specific unit pricing or detailed specifications, a direct comparison is difficult, but the overall award amount suggests a standard purchase. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract helps manage cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a less formal and potentially less competitive process than full and open competition. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP awards often involve fewer than three bids, especially for smaller dollar amounts. This can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher prices than a fully competed contract.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, limited competition under SAP may mean that the government did not secure the absolute lowest possible price for these desks, as a broader bidding pool could have driven prices down further.

Public Impact

Federal employees in General Services Administration facilities will benefit from the new office furniture. The services delivered include the provision of flat top desks. The geographic impact is concentrated in Georgia, where the contract is being fulfilled. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the manufacturing and delivery of the furniture.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for less competitive pricing due to SAP competition.
Limited transparency on the specific unit cost and comparison to market rates.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Small contract value limits financial risk.
Standard office furniture item with low technical complexity.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture sector for federal agencies is a consistent area of spending. The General Services Administration (GSA) plays a significant role in procuring these goods through various contract vehicles. This specific award falls under the broader category of office equipment and furnishings, which is a mature market with established manufacturers and suppliers. Benchmarks for comparable spending would typically be found within GSA's Federal Supply Schedule or other agency-specific procurement data for similar items.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have been specifically set aside for small businesses, as the 'sb' field is false. However, the contractor, TBM MERCHANT LLC, may be a small business itself. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were mandated or likely to arise from this award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. As a purchase order under SAP, the oversight mechanisms are likely to be standard procurement reviews and contract administration processes. Transparency is moderate, with the award details available in federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule
Office Furniture Procurement
Simplified Acquisition Procedures

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition under SAP.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $21,210.24 to TBM MERCHANT LLC. 7110001491625 FLAT TOP DESK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TBM MERCHANT LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21,210.24.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-06-02.

What is the track record of TBM MERCHANT LLC in fulfilling federal contracts?

Information regarding TBM MERCHANT LLC's track record in fulfilling federal contracts is limited based solely on the provided data. The award is a purchase order for flat top desks valued at $21,210.24, with a short performance period. To assess their track record, one would need to examine historical contract awards to this vendor, their performance ratings (if available), and the types of goods or services previously provided. A review of federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would be necessary to identify past performance and determine if they have a history of successful, timely, and compliant contract execution. Without this additional data, it is difficult to definitively assess their reliability and past performance.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar federal purchases of flat top desks?

Comparing the value of this $21,210.24 contract for flat top desks to similar federal purchases requires access to a broader dataset of office furniture procurements. The provided data does not include unit pricing or detailed specifications of the desks, making a direct per-unit comparison challenging. However, the total award amount is relatively small, suggesting it might be for a limited quantity or for desks with standard features. Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) managed by GSA often provide benchmark pricing for office furniture. A thorough comparison would involve querying FSS price lists or other contract databases for similar desk types, quantities, and award dates to ascertain if this price is competitive or represents a premium. The fact that it was competed under SAP might imply less aggressive price negotiation than a larger, fully competed contract.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?

The primary risks associated with this contract award are relatively low due to its nature and value. The contract is for a standard office supply item (flat top desks), which has minimal technical complexity, reducing the risk of performance issues related to product functionality. The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract structure shifts the cost risk to the contractor, providing budget certainty for the government. The total award value of $21,210.24 is small, limiting the financial exposure for the government. The short duration (delivery between April and June 2026) also minimizes long-term performance risks. Potential risks could include delivery delays or minor quality defects, but these are generally manageable within the context of a small purchase order.

How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) competition for procuring office furniture?

The effectiveness of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) for procuring office furniture is a mixed bag. For small dollar value purchases like this $21,210.24 award, SAP can be an efficient method, allowing for quicker acquisition cycles and reduced administrative burden compared to full and open competition. This can lead to faster delivery of needed supplies. However, SAP typically involves fewer bidders and less formal solicitation processes, which can limit price discovery and potentially result in higher unit costs than might be achieved through a broader competitive process. The effectiveness in terms of achieving the best value for taxpayers depends on the specific market conditions, the number of vendors actively participating in SAP solicitations for office furniture, and the diligence of the contracting officer in seeking competitive quotes.

What are the historical spending patterns for office furniture by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major procurer of office furniture for the federal government, consistently spending significant amounts annually. Historical spending patterns reveal a strong reliance on GSA's Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) for office furniture, offering a wide range of products from numerous manufacturers. GSA also utilizes other contract vehicles and direct procurements, particularly under Simplified Acquisition Procedures for smaller needs. Spending levels can fluctuate based on agency needs, furniture replacement cycles, and overall federal budget allocations. Analyzing historical data would show trends in product types, average prices, and the distribution of awards among large and small businesses. This specific $21.2K award represents a very small fraction of GSA's overall furniture procurement budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8810 ELLESMERE DR, CUMMING, GA, 30041

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,210

Exercised Options: $21,210

Current Obligation: $21,210

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline