GSA awards $2,826 contract for crimping tools, highlighting efficient procurement for specialized hardware

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,826 ($2.8K)

Contractor: Daniels Manufacturing Corporation

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-11-04

Contract Duration: 215 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DIE,CRIMPING TOOL DANIELS MFG CORP P/N: Y715

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32824

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,826.21 to DANIELS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION for work described as: DIE,CRIMPING TOOL DANIELS MFG CORP P/N: Y715 Key points: 1. The contract value is modest, suggesting a focus on specific, potentially low-volume needs. 2. Competition dynamics appear favorable given the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation, implying multiple bids. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the short duration and fixed-price nature of the award. 4. Performance context is limited by the nature of the item, but timely delivery is expected. 5. Sector positioning is within the broader manufacturing and hardware supply chain for federal agencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2,826.21 for a specific tool (DIE,CRIMPING TOOL) is relatively small. Benchmarking against similar federal procurements for specialized tools suggests this price is within a reasonable range, especially considering the fixed-price nature which limits cost overruns. The General Services Administration (GSA) often leverages bulk purchasing power, but for niche items, individual purchase orders can still represent good value if sourced competitively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves soliciting quotes from multiple sources. While specific bidder numbers are not provided, this method generally fosters price discovery and ensures a competitive environment for procurements under a certain dollar threshold. The 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' status indicates that the GSA actively sought competitive bids, likely from a range of qualified suppliers.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, competition under SAP means that the government is likely receiving a fair market price for the crimping tool, avoiding inflated costs that could arise from a sole-source award.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring specialized crimping tools for maintenance or operational tasks will benefit from this contract. The service delivered is the provision of a specific hardware component essential for certain technical operations. The geographic impact is primarily within Florida (ST: FL, SN: FLORIDA), where the contract is likely being fulfilled or utilized. Workforce implications are minimal, likely affecting a small number of individuals involved in the supply chain or tool usage.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited data on contractor past performance for similar federal contracts.
Potential for price fluctuations if demand for this specific tool increases significantly beyond this award.

Positive Signals

Awarded by GSA, an agency with established procurement processes and oversight.
Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost escalation risks.
Short contract duration suggests a focused and manageable scope.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader industrial and hardware manufacturing sector, specifically serving the niche market for specialized tools. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332216 (Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing) indicates the type of industry involved. Federal spending in this area supports the supply chain for essential equipment used across various government operations, ensuring agencies have the necessary tools for maintenance and infrastructure support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (SB: false). However, the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' nature means that small businesses could have participated and potentially won the award if they were among the solicited bidders and offered competitive pricing. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the fulfillment of this order.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed under the General Services Administration (GSA), which has robust oversight mechanisms for federal procurement. The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) likely oversees this specific purchase order. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, and accountability rests with GSA contracting officers to ensure compliance with federal acquisition regulations. Inspector General oversight would apply if any irregularities or fraud were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Hardware Procurement
GSA Schedule Contracts
Tools and Equipment Supply
Manufacturing Sector Support

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition if only a few suppliers can provide this specific tool.
Risk of obsolescence if the tool's technology changes rapidly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,826.21 to DANIELS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION. DIE,CRIMPING TOOL DANIELS MFG CORP P/N: Y715

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DANIELS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,826.21.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-11-04.

What is the typical lead time for delivery of specialized tools like this under GSA contracts?

Lead times for specialized tools under GSA contracts can vary significantly based on manufacturer stock, production schedules, and shipping logistics. For a purchase order under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) with a short duration like this one (ending November 4, 2026, from an April 3, 2026 start), the expectation is typically prompt delivery, often within weeks rather than months. The contract's duration of 215 days suggests the delivery window is planned to be relatively short, likely aligning with standard industry lead times for such items. Factors such as the specific tool's complexity, availability of raw materials for its production, and the supplier's existing inventory play crucial roles. GSA aims to facilitate efficient procurement, so contracts are usually structured to ensure timely fulfillment.

How does the price of this crimping tool compare to commercially available prices?

Directly comparing the $2,826.21 contract value for a 'DIE,CRIMPING TOOL' to commercial prices is challenging without knowing the exact manufacturer part number (P/N: Y715) and specific model details. However, federal procurement often involves negotiated prices that may differ from retail or wholesale commercial rates. Given that this was competed under SAP, the price achieved is likely competitive within the market for government suppliers. If the tool is a standard industrial component, its price might be comparable to commercial equivalents, potentially with a slight premium due to specialized government requirements or a discount if GSA's purchasing volume offers leverage. Without specific commercial benchmarks for P/N Y715, a definitive comparison is difficult, but the competitive bidding process suggests a fair market price was sought.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of small hardware procurement?

The primary risks associated with small hardware procurements like this crimping tool contract are generally low. Potential risks include delivery delays if the supplier faces production or inventory issues, although the short contract duration mitigates this concern. Another risk could be receiving a tool that does not meet the exact specifications required, leading to performance issues, but quality assurance checks should minimize this. Price risk is also minimal due to the fixed-price contract type and competitive bidding under SAP. Unlike large, complex contracts, the financial exposure is limited. The main concern would be ensuring the tool functions as intended for its specific application within the agency.

What is the historical spending pattern for this specific type of tool by the GSA?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for a highly specific item like 'DIE,CRIMPING TOOL DANIELS MFG CORP P/N: Y715' by the GSA requires access to detailed procurement databases beyond the provided summary. General GSA spending on tools and hardware is substantial, supporting numerous federal agencies. However, tracking the exact frequency and value of purchases for this particular part number would necessitate a deep dive into contract award histories, potentially filtering by manufacturer, part number, and PSC/NAICS codes. Without this granular historical data, it's impossible to ascertain if this $2,826 award represents a routine purchase, a one-off requirement, or a significant shift in spending for this item. It is plausible that such specialized tools are purchased infrequently based on specific operational needs rather than on a continuous basis.

How does the contractor, DANIELS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, perform on other federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific performance track record of DANIELS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION on other federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance, one would typically look at metrics such as on-time delivery rates, quality of goods/services provided, adherence to contract terms, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. Agencies like GSA often maintain internal databases or utilize the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to track contractor performance. A comprehensive review would involve querying these systems for DANIELS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION's history, looking for patterns of success or recurring issues across multiple awards. For this specific $2,826 purchase order, the risk appears low due to its size and duration, suggesting a potentially manageable engagement for the contractor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing › Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 526 THORPE ROAD, ORLANDO, FL, 32824

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,826

Exercised Options: $2,826

Current Obligation: $2,826

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline