GSA Awards $2.9M for Bags and Cloth, Sole Source Purchase Order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,938 ($2.9K)

Contractor: American Packaging I, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-05-31

Contract Duration: 58 days

Daily Burn Rate: $51/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BAG, CLOTH

Place of Performance

Location: AUBURN, CAYUGA County, NEW YORK, 13021

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,937.5 to AMERICAN PACKAGING I, INC. for work described as: BAG, CLOTH Key points: 1. Spending on bags and cloth totals $2.94 million. 2. The contract was awarded via sole-source procurement. 3. No small business participation was noted. 4. The sector is office supplies manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract is a sole-source award for office supplies, making direct price comparison difficult. Without competition, it's hard to ascertain if the $2.94 million price represents fair market value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for this $2.94 million purchase order may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these goods.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the sole-source nature of the award. Lack of transparency in the procurement process raises concerns. Essential office supplies are being procured without competitive bidding.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 51 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source procurement
No small business participation
Limited price transparency

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a known entity
Clear delivery dates specified

Sector Analysis

This spending falls within the Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing sector. Benchmarks for this specific type of procurement are difficult to establish due to the sole-source nature, but typical government spending on office supplies is substantial.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract did not involve small business participation. This is a missed opportunity to support small businesses and could indicate a lack of outreach or specific requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source award warrants further oversight to ensure the price paid is reasonable and that future procurements of this nature are competed whenever possible.

Related Government Programs

Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competition
Potential for overpayment
No small business inclusion
Limited transparency in pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,937.5 to AMERICAN PACKAGING I, INC.. BAG, CLOTH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMERICAN PACKAGING I, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,937.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-05-31.

What is the justification for the sole-source award for these bags and cloth?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of available sources. Without further details, it's impossible to confirm the validity of the sole-source justification for this $2.94 million purchase of bags and cloth.

What is the risk associated with awarding a contract without competition?

The primary risk of sole-source contracts is the potential for inflated prices due to the absence of competitive pressure. This can lead to inefficient use of taxpayer funds. Additionally, it limits opportunities for other vendors and can stifle innovation.

How effective is this procurement in meeting the agency's needs at a fair price?

The effectiveness in meeting needs is presumed, as a purchase order was issued. However, the effectiveness in securing a fair price is questionable due to the sole-source award. Without competition, there's no benchmark to confirm value for money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing › Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: OFFICE SUPPLIES AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 363 WATERS EDGE, AUBURN, NY, 13021

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,938

Exercised Options: $2,938

Current Obligation: $2,938

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline