GSA awards $2,845 purchase order for contemporary L-shaped desks to Norex Group, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,846 ($2.8K)
Contractor: Norex Group, LLC
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-03
End Date: 2026-06-02
Contract Duration: 60 days
Daily Burn Rate: $47/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: DESK,L-UNITWITH L-RETURN ATTACHMENT60 IN. WIDE,30 IN. DEEP29 IN. HIGH WITH 42 IN.WIDE X 18 IN.DEEP X 29IN. HIGH RETURN.CID: A-A-3188 DESK, L-RETURN ATTACHMENT,CREDENZAS, STEEL,CONTEMPORARY STYLE,LEFT HAND PEDESTALWITHRIGHT HAND RETURN, BLACKRIGHT HAN
Place of Performance
Location: VALENCIA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91381
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $2,845.55 to NOREX GROUP, LLC for work described as: DESK,L-UNITWITH L-RETURN ATTACHMENT60 IN. WIDE,30 IN. DEEP29 IN. HIGH WITH 42 IN.WIDE X 18 IN.DEEP X 29IN. HIGH RETURN.CID: A-A-3188 DESK, L-RETURN ATTACHMENT,CREDENZAS, STEEL,CONTEMPORARY STYLE,LEFT HAND PEDESTALWITHRIGHT HAND RETURN, BLACKRIGHT HAN Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the fixed-price nature of the purchase order. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially limited competition environment for this specific furniture type. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the relatively small dollar value and short duration. 4. Performance context is a standard furniture procurement for federal agencies. 5. Sector positioning is within the office furniture manufacturing and supply chain.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $2,845.55 for two L-shaped desks with returns is within a reasonable range for commercial office furniture. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for office furniture suggests that pricing is competitive, especially considering the contemporary style and specific dimensions requested. The firm fixed-price structure limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.
Cost Per Unit: $1,422.78 per desk unit
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting that multiple quotes were solicited, but the level of competition is not explicitly detailed. SAP is typically used for purchases under $250,000, allowing for a streamlined procurement process. The number of bidders is not specified, which makes it difficult to fully assess the breadth of competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Competition under SAP aims to balance efficiency with obtaining fair and reasonable prices for taxpayers, though a higher number of bidders generally leads to better price discovery.
Public Impact
Federal employees in California will benefit from new, contemporary office furniture. The services delivered include the provision of two L-shaped desks with returns. The geographic impact is localized to the facility where the desks will be installed in California. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily involving the delivery and installation of furniture.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed competition data for SAP procurements can obscure potential cost savings.
- Limited information on contractor past performance for similar large-scale furniture projects.
- Potential for higher per-unit costs if competition was not robust.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract limits cost escalation risks.
- Short contract duration minimizes long-term commitment and associated risks.
- Procurement falls under established GSA schedules, implying some level of pre-qualification.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader office furniture and supplies sector, which is a mature market with numerous manufacturers and distributors. Government spending in this area is consistent, supporting agencies' needs for functional and ergonomic workspaces. Comparable spending benchmarks for office furniture vary widely based on style, material, and quantity, but this purchase appears to be for a small quantity of mid-range to high-end contemporary desks.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this was not a small business set-aside contract. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely negligible for this specific purchase order, as it does not appear to have been specifically targeted towards small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this purchase order is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability is ensured through the firm fixed-price contract terms and the standard procurement regulations. Transparency is facilitated by the public availability of contract data, though specific details on the bidding process are limited.
Related Government Programs
- GSA Office Furniture Procurement
- Federal Workspace Modernization Programs
- Government Purchase Card Purchases
Risk Flags
- Limited competition data available for SAP procurements.
- Potential for non-compliance with delivery timelines.
- Quality of delivered furniture may not meet expectations.
Tags
office-furniture, gsa, purchase-order, california, competed-under-sap, firm-fixed-price, contemporary-style, steel-furniture, small-purchase
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $2,845.55 to NOREX GROUP, LLC. DESK,L-UNITWITH L-RETURN ATTACHMENT60 IN. WIDE,30 IN. DEEP29 IN. HIGH WITH 42 IN.WIDE X 18 IN.DEEP X 29IN. HIGH RETURN.CID: A-A-3188 DESK, L-RETURN ATTACHMENT,CREDENZAS, STEEL,CONTEMPORARY STYLE,LEFT HAND PEDESTALWITHRIGHT HAND RETURN, BLACKRIGHT HAN
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NOREX GROUP, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2,845.55.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-06-02.
What is the track record of NOREX GROUP, LLC in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for furniture?
A review of federal procurement data indicates that NOREX GROUP, LLC has been awarded multiple contracts, primarily through GSA schedules and other competitive processes. While specific details on the volume and type of furniture contracts are not fully elaborated in this dataset, their presence as a vendor suggests they have met basic eligibility and performance requirements. Further investigation into their contract history, including any performance reviews or past issues, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their track record. However, the award of this purchase order implies a level of confidence from the contracting agency in their ability to deliver.
How does the per-unit cost of these desks compare to similar government furniture purchases?
The per-unit cost of $1,422.78 for these L-shaped desks with returns is within a reasonable range for contemporary, high-quality office furniture procured by the government. Government contracts for similar items can range significantly, from basic utility desks costing a few hundred dollars to executive suites costing several thousand. Given the description of 'steel, contemporary style, left hand pedestal with right hand return,' this price point suggests a mid-to-high-end offering. Benchmarking against GSA Advantage! or other federal supply schedules for comparable items would provide a more precise comparison, but the price does not immediately appear excessive for the described product.
What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?
The primary risks associated with this contract award are relatively low due to its nature. The firm fixed-price contract structure mitigates the risk of cost overruns for the government. The short duration (60 days) minimizes long-term commitment and potential performance issues. The main risks would be related to delivery delays or the furniture not meeting the specified quality or condition upon arrival. However, given the small dollar value and the established procurement channels (GSA), these risks are generally considered manageable. The contractor's past performance, if available, would further inform the risk assessment.
How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) in ensuring competitive pricing for furniture?
Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed to streamline the procurement process for purchases under $250,000, balancing efficiency with fair and reasonable pricing. For furniture, SAP typically involves soliciting quotes from multiple sources, often through GSA schedules or direct outreach. While SAP can lead to quicker acquisition, the level of competition achieved can vary. If only a few vendors are solicited or if the market for the specific item is limited, the price discovery might not be as robust as in a full and open competition. However, for items like office furniture, where the market is generally competitive, SAP can still yield good value for the government.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar office furniture by the General Services Administration?
The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary channel for federal agencies to procure office furniture, utilizing various contract vehicles including GSA Schedules (like Schedule 71 Part I for Furniture) and other competitive methods. Historical spending data indicates that GSA facilitates billions of dollars in furniture procurements annually, supporting agencies nationwide. Spending patterns fluctuate based on agency needs, budget cycles, and modernization initiatives. Purchases range from individual desk replacements to large-scale outfitting of new facilities. The specific category of 'contemporary L-shaped desks' represents a segment of the broader office furniture market that GSA consistently supports.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing › Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 26839 PEPPERTREE DR, VALENCIA, CA, 91381
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,846
Exercised Options: $2,846
Current Obligation: $2,846
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-03
Current End Date: 2026-06-02
Potential End Date: 2026-06-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-05
More Contracts from Norex Group, LLC
- Chamois,Syntheticwoven Viscose Rayon Fiber, 15 Inches Long; 15 Inches Wide; 0.0365 Inch Thick; Assorted Colors — $12.4K (General Services Administration)
- Credenza Contemporarysteel TWO Sections Andkneespace 60'' Wide Black — $8.8K (General Services Administration)
- Gravel,Water Filterwa B100, 0.12 X 0.06 Inchhhhhh — $7.7K (General Services Administration)
- Sofa — $7.5K (General Services Administration)
- Credenza Contemporarysteel TWO Sections Andkneespace 60'' Wide Black — $7.1K (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)