GSA awards $12.5K purchase order for LED lighting components to WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,459 ($12.5K)

Contractor: Wrigglesworth Enterprises Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-04-17

Contract Duration: 14 days

Daily Burn Rate: $890/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LED 5000K TYPE B 450W BALLAST BYPASS

Place of Performance

Location: WILMINGTON, NEW HANOVER County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28412

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $12,458.8 to WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC for work described as: LED 5000K TYPE B 450W BALLAST BYPASS Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused procurement for specific components. 2. The short duration of the contract (14 days) indicates an immediate need or a pilot purchase. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332216 points to a specialized manufacturing sector. 5. The award was made under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), typical for smaller dollar value procurements. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests no specific targeting for small businesses in this instance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12,458.80 is modest, making direct comparison to larger contracts difficult. However, for a purchase order of this size and duration, the pricing appears reasonable, especially given the firm fixed price structure which limits potential cost overruns. Benchmarking against similar procurements for specialized LED components would provide a more precise value assessment, but initial indicators suggest fair market value was sought.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which allows for a broader range of competition than micro-purchase thresholds but is less formal than full-and-open competition for larger contracts. The data indicates two bids were received, suggesting a moderate level of competition for this specific procurement. While not a large-scale competitive bid, SAP aims to ensure fair pricing and access for eligible vendors.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of SAP, even with a limited number of bidders, helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by obtaining competitive pricing for goods and services.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring specific LED lighting components for facilities or equipment will benefit from this procurement. The services delivered include the supply of specialized LED lighting components, likely for replacement or new installations. The geographic impact is primarily within North Carolina, where the contractor is located, and potentially at the receiving federal facility. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving manufacturing and logistics for the specific components.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to specialized nature of components.
Short contract duration may not reflect long-term needs or scalability.
Reliance on a single purchase order might not leverage bulk purchasing power.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
Use of SAP ensures some level of competition and fair pricing.
Award to a specific vendor indicates a successful match for the required components.

Sector Analysis

The procurement falls within the broader electrical equipment manufacturing sector, specifically related to lighting components. The market for LED lighting is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, with significant government spending allocated towards energy-efficient solutions. This contract, though small, represents a piece of the government's ongoing effort to modernize its lighting infrastructure and reduce energy consumption.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC. may be a small business, the procurement method (SAP) does not inherently guarantee small business participation. Subcontracting implications are unlikely given the small value and short duration. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is minimal for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this purchase order would typically be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price contract type, requiring delivery of specified goods. Transparency is facilitated by contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are not provided in this summary.

Related Government Programs

Federal Energy Management Program
GSA Schedules Program
General Services Administration Procurement Data

Risk Flags

Short contract duration may indicate urgency or limited scope.
Limited competition (2 bidders) under SAP could warrant further review for larger future needs.
Component specificity might lead to supply chain vulnerabilities if not managed proactively.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $12,458.8 to WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC. LED 5000K TYPE B 450W BALLAST BYPASS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12,458.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-04-17.

What is the track record of WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC. with federal contracts?

Information regarding WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC.'s specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require examining historical contract awards, performance reviews, and any past issues or successes. Without this historical data, it's difficult to assess their reliability or past performance in fulfilling government requirements. Further research into federal procurement databases like FPDS or SAM.gov would be necessary to build a complete picture of their federal contracting history.

How does the unit cost of these LED components compare to market rates?

The provided data does not include specific unit costs for the LED components, only the total contract value. To compare unit costs to market rates, one would need the quantity of components purchased and their individual prices. Assuming the $12,458.80 covers a specific number of units, obtaining that quantity would be the first step. Subsequently, market research on similar LED components (e.g., wattage, type, brand if applicable) from commercial vendors or other government contracts would be necessary for a meaningful benchmark. Without this granular data, a precise unit cost comparison is not feasible.

What are the potential risks associated with this specific contract?

Potential risks for this contract include the possibility of supply chain disruptions affecting the delivery of specialized components, especially given the short performance period. There's also a risk that the components may not meet the exact technical specifications required by the end-user, leading to potential rework or dissatisfaction. Given the small value and short duration, the risk of significant financial loss to the government is low, but operational delays could occur if the components are critical for an immediate need. The limited competition under SAP could also pose a minor risk if the selected vendor underperforms.

What is the overall effectiveness of using SAP for procuring such components?

The effectiveness of using Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) for procuring components like these LED parts depends on the specific circumstances. SAP is designed for efficiency and speed for procurements under the simplified threshold, balancing competition with administrative burden. For a $12.5K purchase order with a 14-day delivery, SAP is likely effective in meeting an immediate need quickly. However, if the government frequently procures similar components in larger quantities, a more strategic approach like using GSA Schedules or larger competitive bids might yield better pricing and ensure a more robust supply chain. The two bids received suggest SAP facilitated adequate, though not extensive, market engagement.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar LED components by the GSA?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar LED components by the GSA would require accessing and querying extensive federal procurement data. This would involve filtering awards by the relevant NAICS codes (e.g., lighting manufacturing, electrical equipment), product service codes (PSCs), and keywords related to LED components. Examining trends over several fiscal years would reveal the volume, average price points, and primary contractors for such items. This contract's value of $12,458.80 appears to be on the lower end for individual procurements, suggesting it might be for a specific, limited need rather than a large-scale rollout.

Does the contractor have any past performance issues reported?

The provided data snippet does not contain information about past performance issues for WRIGGLESWORTH ENTERPRISES INC. Assessing past performance typically involves reviewing contractor performance evaluation reports (CPARS) or other official records of contractor quality and timeliness. Without access to these specific reports or a broader contract history, it is impossible to determine if the contractor has any documented issues. A thorough due diligence process would include checking these official sources before awarding significant contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing › Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3516 S COLLEGE RD, WILMINGTON, NC, 28412

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,459

Exercised Options: $12,459

Current Obligation: $12,459

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline