GSA awards $3.6M contract for pressure-sensitive adhesive tape, with delivery orders expected within 28 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,608 ($3.6K)

Contractor: Valley Industrial Products Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-05-07

Contract Duration: 28 days

Daily Burn Rate: $129/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: TAPE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE: ITEM NAME TAPE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE OVERALL WIDTH 2.800 INCHES OVERALL LENGTH 60.00 YARDS (PER ROLL) OVERALL CORE DIAMETER 3.000 INCHES OVERALL THICKNESS 0.006 INCHES UNIT TYPE MASKING TAPE UNIT DESIGN CRITI

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTINGTON, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11743

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,608 to VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC for work described as: TAPE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE: ITEM NAME TAPE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE OVERALL WIDTH 2.800 INCHES OVERALL LENGTH 60.00 YARDS (PER ROLL) OVERALL CORE DIAMETER 3.000 INCHES OVERALL THICKNESS 0.006 INCHES UNIT TYPE MASKING TAPE UNIT DESIGN CRITI Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.6 million for adhesive tape suggests a significant volume requirement. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process with specific source considerations. 3. Delivery orders are expected within a short 28-day duration, implying a need for rapid fulfillment. 4. The fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment offers some protection against market fluctuations for the contractor. 5. The supplier, VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC, will provide masking tape with specific dimensions. 6. The contract falls under the Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.6 million for adhesive tape needs to be benchmarked against similar GSA procurements for office supplies. Without specific unit pricing or comparison data, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment structure can sometimes lead to higher initial costs compared to pure fixed-price contracts, but it mitigates risk for the supplier in volatile markets. Further analysis would require understanding the quantity of tape procured and its unit cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was open, certain sources may have been excluded based on specific criteria or prior agreements. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a competitive environment was intended. The exclusion of sources warrants further investigation to understand its impact on the breadth of competition and potential price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process, which generally leads to better pricing. However, the exclusion of certain sources could potentially limit the most competitive offers, impacting the overall value achieved for taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring masking tape for various office and operational needs will benefit from this contract. The services delivered include the supply of pressure-sensitive adhesive masking tape with specific physical characteristics. The contract is geographically focused on New York (ST: NY, SN: NEW YORK), indicating a primary delivery or administrative location. Workforce implications are likely minimal, primarily related to the manufacturing and distribution of the tape by the awarded contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'after exclusion of sources' clause in the competition type requires scrutiny to ensure it did not unduly restrict competition and lead to suboptimal pricing.
Lack of detailed unit pricing makes it challenging to benchmark the value for money effectively.
The economic price adjustment clause, while standard, can introduce variability in the final cost to the government over the contract period.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a structured and accessible bidding process.
The contract has a defined period of performance with specific delivery order timelines, indicating clear expectations.
The General Services Administration (GSA) is a reputable agency known for managing large-scale federal procurement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader 'Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing' sector, classified under NAICS code 339940. This sector includes the production of various stationery and office supplies. The market for adhesive tapes is substantial, driven by both commercial and government demand. Benchmarking this contract's value would involve comparing its total value and potential unit costs against other GSA Schedule or open market procurements for similar adhesive tapes, considering factors like quantity, specifications, and contract type.

Small Business Impact

The contract indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration, as 'ss' (small business set-aside) is false and 'sb' (small business) is false. This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC, as a prime contractor, chooses to engage small businesses in its supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including delivery schedules and product specifications. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to this procurement.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
Office Supplies Procurement
Adhesive Products Contracts
Manufacturing Contracts
General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for increased costs due to Economic Price Adjustment clause.
Competition level may have been impacted by source exclusion.
Lack of detailed unit pricing hinders thorough value-for-money assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,608 to VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC. TAPE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE: ITEM NAME TAPE, PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE OVERALL WIDTH 2.800 INCHES OVERALL LENGTH 60.00 YARDS (PER ROLL) OVERALL CORE DIAMETER 3.000 INCHES OVERALL THICKNESS 0.006 INCHES UNIT TYPE MASKING TAPE UNIT DESIGN CRITI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,608.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-05-07.

What is the historical spending pattern for pressure-sensitive adhesive tape by the General Services Administration?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for pressure-sensitive adhesive tape by the GSA would involve querying federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG or USASpending.gov for similar contracts awarded over the past several fiscal years. Key metrics to examine would include the total dollar value of awards, the number of unique contractors, the average contract value, and the prevalence of different contract types (e.g., fixed-price, IDIQ). Understanding historical trends can reveal whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and identify dominant suppliers or contract vehicles. This context is crucial for evaluating the current $3.6 million award as potentially high, low, or in line with previous procurement activities for this specific item.

How does the unit cost of this adhesive tape compare to market rates or similar federal contracts?

To compare the unit cost of this adhesive tape, we would need to know the quantity of tape procured under the $3.6 million contract. Assuming a quantity, we could calculate the unit price (total contract value divided by quantity). This calculated unit price would then be benchmarked against publicly available pricing for similar masking tapes from major manufacturers and distributors, as well as against unit prices from other federal contracts for comparable items. Federal procurement data often reveals price variations based on volume, specifications, and competition. If the calculated unit price is significantly higher than market rates or comparable federal contracts, it would indicate potential issues with value for money.

What are the specific criteria used to exclude certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award?

The specific criteria used to exclude certain sources in a 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award are typically detailed in the solicitation documents or justification for other than full and open competition, if applicable. These exclusions are often based on factors such as the unique capabilities of a specific source, the need to maintain compatibility with existing systems, or specific regulatory requirements. For this contract, the GSA may have excluded sources that did not meet stringent technical specifications for the masking tape, lacked specific certifications, or were deemed less capable of meeting the rapid delivery requirements. Understanding these criteria is vital to assess whether the exclusion was justified and if it potentially limited the competitive landscape, thereby impacting price discovery.

What is the track record of VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for office supplies?

VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC's track record in fulfilling federal contracts can be assessed by reviewing their award history in federal procurement databases. This includes examining the types of contracts they have won, their performance ratings (if available), the agencies they have served, and the value and duration of past awards. For contracts related to office supplies, it's important to see if they have a history of successful deliveries, adherence to schedules, and compliance with contract terms. A strong track record suggests a lower risk of performance issues, while a history of issues might raise concerns about the reliability of supply for this new contract. Data on past performance is crucial for evaluating the contractor's reliability.

What are the potential risks associated with the economic price adjustment (EPA) clause in this contract?

The primary risk associated with the economic price adjustment (EPA) clause in this contract is the potential for increased costs to the government if market prices for raw materials or labor rise significantly during the contract period. While EPAs are designed to protect contractors from unforeseen cost increases and ensure fair pricing, they can also lead to higher overall expenditures for the government compared to a firm fixed-price contract, especially in volatile economic conditions. The specific index or formula used for adjustment is critical; if it closely tracks relevant input costs, the risk is managed. However, poorly defined or overly broad adjustment mechanisms can expose the government to substantial cost overruns, necessitating careful monitoring of the index and its impact on the contract price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing › Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: OFFICE SUPPLIES AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 152 NEW YORK AVE, HUNTINGTON, NY, 11743

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,608

Exercised Options: $3,608

Current Obligation: $3,608

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25D000F

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline