GSA awards $3.75M for office furniture, with Indiana Furniture Industries Inc. securing the contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,752 ($3.8K)
Contractor: Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-06
End Date: 2026-07-05
Contract Duration: 90 days
Daily Burn Rate: $42/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SOFA
Place of Performance
Location: JASPER, DUBOIS County, INDIANA, 47547
State: Indiana Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $3,752.14 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. for work described as: SOFA Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair, given the firm-fixed-price structure which shifts risk to the contractor. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a short duration and fixed price mitigating some potential cost overruns. 4. Performance context is limited by the nature of a furniture supply contract. 5. Sector positioning places this within the broader office furniture manufacturing and supply market.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $3.75 million for office furniture over a 90-day period seems reasonable, especially considering it's a firm-fixed-price award. Without specific unit details or comparison data for similar furniture types and quantities, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the fixed-price nature suggests the government has locked in costs, which is a positive indicator for budget predictability.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but a full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and quality for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential suppliers, increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids and thus potentially lower prices.
Public Impact
Federal agencies requiring office furniture will benefit from this contract. The services delivered include the supply of office furniture. The geographic impact is primarily within Indiana, where the contractor is located, but the furniture will be distributed to federal facilities nationwide. Workforce implications include potential support for manufacturing and logistics jobs at Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for long-term reliance on a single supplier if future contracts follow similar patterns.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess efficiency beyond price.
- Limited duration may necessitate frequent re-competition, incurring administrative costs.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
- Award to a known entity (Indiana Furniture Industries) suggests a degree of established capability.
- Full and open competition provides a baseline for market pricing.
Sector Analysis
The office furniture market is a significant segment of the broader manufacturing and wholesale trade sectors. This contract falls within the 'Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing' industry code (NAICS 337214). Spending in this area is driven by federal agency needs for outfitting new facilities, replacing aging stock, and supporting telework initiatives. Benchmarks for comparable spending would typically involve analyzing historical GSA schedules or other agency procurements for similar office furnishings.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates the awardee is not a small business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award notice. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific contract appears minimal, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses in their supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. As a Best Practices Acquisition (BPA) Call, it likely adheres to established GSA procurement policies and procedures. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, and accountability rests with GSA's contracting officers to ensure compliance with the contract terms and conditions.
Related Government Programs
- GSA Schedules Program
- Federal Supply Service Contracts
- Office Furniture Procurement
- Government Furnishings
Risk Flags
- Potential for delivery delays
- Quality control concerns
- Furniture not meeting specific agency needs
Tags
office-furniture, gsa, general-services-administration, indiana, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, manufacturing, federal-acquisition-service, office-furniture-except-wood-manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $3,752.14 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.. SOFA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3,752.14.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-07-05.
What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture by the General Services Administration?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for office furniture by the GSA reveals a consistent demand driven by agency requirements for outfitting workspaces. GSA utilizes various contracting vehicles, including GSA Schedules and other competitive procurements, to meet these needs. Spending can fluctuate based on federal budget allocations, agency growth or downsizing, and infrastructure projects. For instance, periods of significant federal hiring or new building construction often correlate with increased furniture procurement. Without access to specific GSA historical spending data for NAICS code 337214 or similar categories, it's difficult to provide precise figures. However, it is reasonable to assume multi-million dollar annual expenditures across the federal government for such essential supplies, with GSA playing a central role in facilitating these purchases through its established contracting mechanisms.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar office furniture?
A direct comparison of the awarded price ($3.75 million) to specific market rates for similar office furniture is challenging without detailed product specifications, quantities, and delivery terms. The contract is for 'Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing,' a broad category. However, the firm-fixed-price nature of the award suggests that Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. has priced its offering competitively within the parameters of the full and open competition. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare the unit prices of specific items (e.g., desks, chairs, filing cabinets) against GSA Schedule pricing, other government contracts, or commercial catalog prices for comparable quality and features. The absence of this granular data prevents a definitive statement on whether the price is above or below market.
What is the track record of Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. with federal contracts?
Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. has a history of engaging with federal contracts, as evidenced by this award. A comprehensive review of their track record would involve examining past performance on similar government contracts, including their timeliness in delivery, product quality, and adherence to contract terms. Databases like SAM.gov or FPDS can provide insights into previous awards, contract values, and performance ratings, if available. Understanding their history with the GSA or other agencies can indicate their reliability and experience in meeting government procurement requirements. A positive track record typically involves successful completion of previous contracts with minimal disputes or performance issues, suggesting a lower risk for future awards.
What are the potential risks associated with this specific contract award?
The primary risks associated with this contract are related to potential delivery delays, quality control issues, or the possibility that the furniture may not meet specific agency ergonomic or functional requirements, despite the fixed-price nature. Given the short duration (90 days), the risk of significant cost overruns for the contractor is mitigated, but the government still faces the risk of not receiving the required furniture within the specified timeframe. Another risk could be the limited scope of the award; if this is a call against a larger BPA, the overall value and duration could be much longer, introducing more complex risks. However, for this specific call order, the risks appear relatively contained due to the fixed price and short term.
How does this contract contribute to the overall federal strategy for office furnishings?
This contract contributes to the federal strategy for office furnishings by ensuring that agencies have access to necessary furniture through a competitively procured mechanism. GSA's role is to provide efficient and cost-effective solutions for federal workspace needs. Awards like this support the government's objective of acquiring durable, functional, and appropriately priced office furniture. It aligns with strategies aimed at modernizing federal workspaces, supporting telework arrangements, and ensuring compliance with accessibility and sustainability standards, depending on the specific furniture items procured. The use of full and open competition reinforces the strategy of leveraging market forces to achieve best value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: FURNITURE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1919 HOSPITALITY DRIVE STE A, JASPER, IN, 47546
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,752
Exercised Options: $3,752
Current Obligation: $3,752
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A000R
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-06
Current End Date: 2026-07-05
Potential End Date: 2026-07-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.
- Chair,Easy — $18.6K (General Services Administration)
- Table,Occasional — $9.7K (General Services Administration)
- Chair,Rotary — $9.6K (General Services Administration)
- Sofa — $9.0K (General Services Administration)
- Chair,Rotary — $8.3K (General Services Administration)
View all Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. federal contracts →
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)