GSA Awards $2.3M for Cushioning Material to Kirkland Sales Inc. Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,313 ($2.3K)

Contractor: Kirkland Sales Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-04-27

Contract Duration: 21 days

Daily Burn Rate: $110/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CUSHIONING MATERIAL

Place of Performance

Location: GARLAND, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75041

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,312.5 to KIRKLAND SALES INC. for work described as: CUSHIONING MATERIAL Key points: 1. Contract value of $2.31M for urethane and foam products. 2. Awarded via Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 3. Potential risk associated with limited vendor pool if exclusions are not justified. 4. Sector is Manufacturing (Urethane and Other Foam Product).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.31M for cushioning material appears to be within a reasonable range for bulk material procurement. However, without specific unit cost data or comparison to similar GSA schedules, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources.' This method suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of price discovery and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer impact is moderate, with funds allocated for essential cushioning materials. The effectiveness of competition in driving down costs will determine the ultimate taxpayer benefit.

Public Impact

Ensures availability of essential cushioning materials for federal agencies. Supports manufacturing sector jobs in Texas. Potential for cost savings if competitive bidding was robust despite source exclusions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for reduced competition due to source exclusion.
Lack of detailed per-unit cost data for benchmarking.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a competitive process.
Clear contract end date provides predictability.

Sector Analysis

The procurement falls within the Urethane and Other Foam Product Manufacturing sector. Spending benchmarks for this specific niche are not readily available, but GSA's role is to aggregate demand for common goods to achieve economies of scale.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this specific award or if they were excluded. Further analysis would be needed to determine the impact on small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for this contract. Oversight would involve monitoring contract performance, adherence to terms, and ensuring fair pricing throughout the delivery order period.

Related Government Programs

Urethane and Other Foam Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
Lack of detailed per-unit cost data for robust price analysis.
Dependence on a single vendor (Kirkland Sales Inc.) for this specific delivery order.
Need for clear justification of source exclusions to ensure fairness and value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,312.5 to KIRKLAND SALES INC.. CUSHIONING MATERIAL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KIRKLAND SALES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,312.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-04-27.

What was the justification for excluding specific sources in the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' process, and how did this impact the final price?

The justification for excluding sources is critical. If exclusions were based on specific technical requirements or past performance, it could be valid. However, if arbitrary, it may have limited competition and led to a higher price than achievable through broader bidding. Understanding the rationale is key to assessing value for money.

How does the $2.31M contract value compare to historical spending on similar cushioning materials by the GSA or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking this contract against historical spending requires access to detailed procurement data. Without comparative figures for the same or similar materials, it's challenging to definitively state if $2.31M represents a good or fair price. GSA's aggregated purchasing power should ideally yield competitive rates.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure effectiveness and taxpayer value?

Key performance indicators would likely include timely delivery, material quality meeting specifications, and adherence to the firm fixed price. Measuring these ensures the government receives the goods as contracted. Effectiveness is tied to the material's performance in its intended application and the overall efficiency of the procurement process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Plastics Product Manufacturing › Urethane and Other Foam Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CONTAINERS/PACKAGING/PACKING SUPPL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2210 SHERWIN ST, GARLAND, TX, 75041

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,313

Exercised Options: $2,313

Current Obligation: $2,313

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSEA22D0030

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline