GSA awards $2.78M for office furniture, highlighting potential for value through competitive bidding

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,785 ($2.8K)

Contractor: Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TABLE,OFFICE

Place of Performance

Location: JASPER, DUBOIS County, INDIANA, 47546

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,785.46 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. for work described as: TABLE,OFFICE Key points: 1. Contract leverages a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, suggesting pre-negotiated terms and potentially faster delivery. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a broad market solicitation. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The duration of 90 days suggests a focused, short-term requirement. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 337214 points to a specific manufacturing sector for office furniture. 6. The contractor, Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc., is positioned to fulfill this specific need.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.78 million for a 90-day period for office furniture appears reasonable, especially given it was awarded through a competitive process. Without specific details on the quantity and type of furniture, a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. However, the use of a BPA Call implies that pricing may have been benchmarked during the initial BPA establishment, suggesting a degree of pre-vetted value. The fixed-price nature further supports value by locking in costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific mechanism used was a BPA Call, which is a task order against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. This implies that the initial BPA was competed broadly, and this call represents a specific order placed within those established terms. The level of competition for the initial BPA would have been key to ensuring price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best prices to secure the contract.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring office furniture will benefit from the availability of these goods. The services delivered include the manufacturing and supply of office furniture. The geographic impact is likely national, as GSA procures for various federal agencies across the US. This contract supports the manufacturing workforce within the office furniture industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for long-term reliance on a single contractor if this BPA call leads to future orders without re-competition.
The 90-day duration might indicate a rush order, potentially leading to higher per-unit costs than a longer-term contract.
Lack of specific details on furniture types and quantities makes it hard to assess if the best possible value was achieved.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
Fixed-price contract type protects against cost escalations.
Utilizes a BPA Call, suggesting efficiency and potentially pre-negotiated favorable terms.
Supports a specific manufacturing sector (NAICS 337214).

Sector Analysis

The office furniture manufacturing sector (NAICS 337214) is a mature industry. Federal agencies are significant consumers of office furniture, with the General Services Administration (GSA) playing a crucial role in procurement. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on agency needs for new facilities, renovations, or replacements. Benchmarks for federal office furniture spending are typically aggregated by GSA across various contract vehicles and agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside for this particular BPA Call. While the primary contractor is Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc., it is not explicitly identified as a small business. There is no information provided on subcontracting plans. This means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific award is likely minimal, unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) generally has robust oversight mechanisms for its procurements, including BPAs. This contract falls under the Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight would typically involve contract administration to ensure delivery and quality standards are met. Transparency is usually maintained through public contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Contracts
Office and Building Furniture Procurements
Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Federal Civilian Agency Furniture Needs

Risk Flags

Potential for price escalation if not adequately benchmarked in the parent BPA.
Delivery timeline risk given the short 90-day duration.
Quality assurance of furniture meeting federal specifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,785.46 to INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.. TABLE,OFFICE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INDIANA FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,785.46.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. with federal contracts?

Indiana Furniture Industries, Inc. has a history of federal contracting, primarily through the General Services Administration (GSA). The provided data indicates this specific award is a BPA Call valued at approximately $2.78 million with an end date in June 2026. To fully assess their track record, a deeper dive into their contract history would be necessary. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the volume and types of goods or services they have previously supplied to the government. A review of their performance on similar furniture contracts would be particularly relevant to gauge their reliability and quality in fulfilling federal requirements.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar office furniture procurements?

The contract value of $2.78 million for a 90-day period for office furniture is a significant award. However, a direct comparison is challenging without knowing the exact specifications, quantity, and quality of the furniture procured. GSA procures a vast array of office furniture through various vehicles, including Federal Supply Schedules and other BPAs. Generally, fixed-price contracts awarded under full and open competition are expected to yield competitive pricing. If this BPA Call was against an existing, competitively awarded BPA, the pricing should be considered pre-vetted. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare the per-unit costs for specific items (e.g., desks, chairs) against other GSA contracts or market research data for similar federal requirements.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential issues with delivery timelines if the 90-day duration is tight for manufacturing and delivery, quality control of the furniture to meet federal standards, and price competitiveness if the initial BPA pricing was not aggressively negotiated. Given it's a fixed-price contract, the risk of cost overruns for the government is low, but the contractor bears that risk. Another potential risk is the lack of specific details on the furniture items, making it difficult to ascertain if the most cost-effective solutions were chosen. Finally, if this BPA Call represents a significant portion of the contractor's output, any disruption in their operations could impact delivery.

How effective is the use of a BPA Call for this type of procurement?

Using a BPA Call against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) is generally an effective method for procuring recurring needs like office furniture, especially when established under GSA. BPAs streamline the ordering process, reduce administrative burden, and can offer better pricing due to pre-negotiated terms. The effectiveness hinges on the initial competition for the parent BPA and the clarity of the terms within it. For a 90-day requirement, a BPA Call is likely more efficient than initiating a new full and open competition. It allows agencies to quickly obtain needed supplies while leveraging the GSA's established contracting vehicles and vendor relationships.

What are the historical spending patterns for office furniture by the GSA?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary channel for federal agencies procuring office furniture. Historical spending patterns show consistent, substantial investment in this category, driven by agency relocations, renovations, and equipment refresh cycles. GSA utilizes various contract vehicles, including Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) and BPAs, to meet these needs. Spending can fluctuate annually based on federal budgets and agency-specific capital investment plans. Analyzing GSA's historical data reveals significant annual outlays, often in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars, for furniture and furnishings across the government, underscoring the importance of competitive contracting and value management in this sector.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1919 HOSPITALITY DRIVE STE A, JASPER, IN, 47546

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,785

Exercised Options: $2,785

Current Obligation: $2,785

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA24A08N5

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline