GSA Awards $202K for Office Furniture Densification in North Carolina

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $201,716 ($201.7K)

Contractor: Corporate Interiors Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-08-14

End Date: 2026-01-30

Contract Duration: 169 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RALEIGH TSFB FURNITURE DENSIFICATION PROJECT

Place of Performance

Location: RALEIGH, WAKE County, NORTH CAROLINA, 27601

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $201,716.14 to CORPORATE INTERIORS INC for work described as: RALEIGH TSFB FURNITURE DENSIFICATION PROJECT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Corporate Interiors Inc. for furniture densification. 2. Project aims to optimize workspace efficiency through furniture solutions. 3. Full and open competition was utilized for this procurement. 4. Spending is within the typical range for office furniture projects of this scale.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award amount of $202,116.14 appears reasonable for a furniture densification project of this size. Benchmarking against similar GSA furniture contracts suggests competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery. This method allows multiple vendors to bid, driving down costs and ensuring fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used efficiently through a competitive bidding process for essential office furnishings.

Public Impact

Enhances workspace functionality for federal employees in North Carolina. Supports the modernization of federal office environments. Potential for improved employee productivity and space utilization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

  • Utilizes full and open competition.
  • Clear project objective for workspace optimization.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader office furniture and furnishings sector. Spending benchmarks for similar government furniture procurements indicate this award is within a typical range.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Corporate Interiors Inc. No specific information is provided regarding small business participation or subcontracting goals for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract through its Federal Acquisition Service, ensuring adherence to procurement regulations and project delivery.

Related Government Programs

  • Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Tags

wood-office-furniture-manufacturing, general-services-administration, nc, bpa-call, 100k-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $201,716.14 to CORPORATE INTERIORS INC. RALEIGH TSFB FURNITURE DENSIFICATION PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CORPORATE INTERIORS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $201,716.14.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-14. End: 2026-01-30.

What is the expected impact of this furniture densification on employee productivity and morale?

The densification project aims to improve workspace efficiency, which can indirectly boost productivity by providing better-organized and more functional work areas. However, the impact on morale depends on how the densification is implemented and whether employees feel their needs are considered during the process. Clear communication and employee involvement are key to a positive outcome.

Are there any potential risks associated with the chosen furniture or installation process?

Potential risks include disruption to daily operations during installation, compatibility issues with existing infrastructure, and the long-term durability of the new furniture. Thorough site assessment, phased installation, and selection of high-quality, ergonomic furniture can mitigate these risks. Vendor experience and clear communication channels are also crucial.

How does this project align with broader federal sustainability goals?

The project's alignment with sustainability goals would depend on the specific furniture chosen. If the furniture is made from recycled materials, is energy-efficient (e.g., integrated lighting), or is designed for longevity and recyclability, it would contribute positively. Information on the materials and lifecycle assessment of the selected furniture would be needed for a definitive answer.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOffice Furniture (including Fixtures) ManufacturingWood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QSMA25Q0052

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 223 LISA DR, NEW CASTLE, DE, 19720

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $201,716

Exercised Options: $201,716

Current Obligation: $201,716

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA23A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-08-14

Current End Date: 2026-01-30

Potential End Date: 2026-05-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-08

More Contracts from Corporate Interiors Inc

View all Corporate Interiors Inc federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending