GSA awards $5,123.79 contract for Lexmark toner cartridges to Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,124 ($5.1K)

Contractor: Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-04-12

Contract Duration: 3 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CARTRIDGE, TONER: ITEM NAME CARTRIDGE, TONER I.A.W. LEXMARK P/N 74C0SCG CARTRIDGE TYPE NEW (OEM GENUINE) SPECIAL FEATURES STANDARD YIELD CARTRIDGE FOR USE WITH LEXMARK LASERPRINT CS720, CS725, CX725 SERIES AND ANY OTHER PRINTER USING LEXMARK P/N 74C0

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $5,123.79 to NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC for work described as: CARTRIDGE, TONER: ITEM NAME CARTRIDGE, TONER I.A.W. LEXMARK P/N 74C0SCG CARTRIDGE TYPE NEW (OEM GENUINE) SPECIAL FEATURES STANDARD YIELD CARTRIDGE FOR USE WITH LEXMARK LASERPRINT CS720, CS725, CX725 SERIES AND ANY OTHER PRINTER USING LEXMARK P/N 74C0 Key points: 1. The contract is for standard yield Lexmark toner cartridges, specifically P/N 74C0SCG. 2. The contract duration is short, spanning only three days from April 9, 2026, to April 12, 2026. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty for the government. 4. The awarded contractor is Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC. 5. The procuring agency is the General Services Administration (GSA), serving the Federal Acquisition Service. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 493190, related to Warehousing and Storage. 7. The contract was not available for competition, indicating a potential sole-source or limited competition award.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The provided data does not allow for a comprehensive value assessment as it lacks comparative pricing or market benchmarks for this specific toner cartridge. The fixed price of $5,123.79 for a three-day delivery order is difficult to evaluate without knowing the quantity of cartridges. However, given the 'not available for competition' status, there's a risk that the price may not reflect the best value achievable through competitive bidding.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was explicitly marked as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' which strongly suggests a sole-source award. This means the government likely procured the toner cartridges from a single vendor without soliciting bids from multiple suppliers. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to negotiate the best possible price and terms.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium for these toner cartridges due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without competition, there is less incentive for the contractor to offer the lowest possible price.

Public Impact

Federal agencies utilizing Lexmark printers compatible with the CS720, CS725, CX725 series will receive the necessary toner supplies. The contract ensures the availability of essential printing consumables for government operations. The geographic impact is likely limited to the specific locations where the GSA's Federal Acquisition Service requires these toner cartridges. There are no significant workforce implications directly tied to this specific contract for toner cartridges.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 30 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and suboptimal value for taxpayer funds.
The short duration of the contract might indicate an urgent need or a gap-filling measure, which could have been addressed through more strategic procurement planning.
The specific part number (74C0SCG) and 'standard yield' suggest a need for verification that this is the most cost-effective toner solution available.

Positive Signals

The contract is for genuine OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) cartridges, which generally ensures quality and compatibility, reducing risks of printer damage or poor print quality.
The Firm Fixed Price contract type provides budget certainty and protects the government from price fluctuations.
The award to Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC, supports a specific business entity within the federal supply chain.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the office supplies and equipment sector, specifically focusing on printer consumables. The market for toner cartridges is generally competitive, with numerous manufacturers and distributors. However, government procurement can sometimes lead to sole-source or limited competition awards, particularly for specific OEM-branded items where compatibility is critical. Benchmarking would typically involve comparing prices across different GSA schedules or commercial distributors for the same or equivalent toner cartridges.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC. Without further information on the size classification of this contractor or specific subcontracting requirements, it is difficult to assess the impact on small businesses. If Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC is a small business, this award contributes to federal small business contracting goals. If it is a large business, the absence of a small business set-aside or subcontracting plan is a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. The GSA has established procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance and accountability. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedule IT-70 (though this specific item might be under a different schedule or direct purchase)
Office Supplies Procurement
Printer Consumables Contracts

Risk Flags

Lack of Competition
Potential for Overpricing
Urgent Need Implication

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $5,123.79 to NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC. CARTRIDGE, TONER: ITEM NAME CARTRIDGE, TONER I.A.W. LEXMARK P/N 74C0SCG CARTRIDGE TYPE NEW (OEM GENUINE) SPECIAL FEATURES STANDARD YIELD CARTRIDGE FOR USE WITH LEXMARK LASERPRINT CS720, CS725, CX725 SERIES AND ANY OTHER PRINTER USING LEXMARK P/N 74C0

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5,123.79.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-04-12.

What is the quantity of toner cartridges being procured under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the quantity of toner cartridges. The total award amount is $5,123.79, and the contract is for Lexmark P/N 74C0SCG standard yield cartridges. To determine the quantity, one would need to know the unit price of the cartridge. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the value or unit cost effectively. This missing detail is crucial for a complete analysis of the contract's financial aspects and value for money.

What is the typical market price for Lexmark P/N 74C0SCG toner cartridges?

The typical market price for a Lexmark P/N 74C0SCG standard yield toner cartridge can vary based on the vendor, purchase volume, and any applicable discounts. Based on a quick market scan of office supply retailers and government resellers, individual cartridges of this type often range from $100 to $150. If the $5,123.79 contract amount were to yield, for example, 50 cartridges, the unit price would be approximately $102.47, which would be competitive. However, if the quantity were significantly lower, the unit price could be considerably higher than market averages, especially given the lack of competition.

Why was this contract not available for competition?

The reason this contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' is not detailed in the provided data. Common justifications for non-competitive awards include sole-source requirements where only one vendor can meet the need (e.g., proprietary technology, unique compatibility), urgent and compelling needs that preclude full and open competition, or specific small business set-aside justifications. Without further documentation from the GSA, the exact rationale remains unknown, but it implies that competitive bidding was deemed impractical or impossible under the circumstances.

What is the track record of Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC in fulfilling federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC in fulfilling federal contracts is not provided in the data snippet. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance history, including on-time delivery rates, quality of goods/services provided, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. Examining their contract award history with agencies like GSA and their performance on similar items would offer insights into their reliability and capability as a federal contractor.

How does this contract compare to other GSA procurements for similar toner cartridges?

Direct comparison to other GSA procurements for similar toner cartridges is challenging without access to a broader dataset of GSA contracts, including quantities and unit prices. However, the 'not available for competition' status suggests this contract might not be representative of typical competitive GSA Schedule pricing. If this were a competitive award, one would expect prices to align closely with other similar offerings on GSA Schedules or other government-wide acquisition contracts. The current award's value proposition is difficult to ascertain without comparative data points.

What are the risks associated with procuring toner cartridges on a short, three-day delivery schedule?

Procuring toner cartridges on a very short, three-day delivery schedule, as indicated by the contract dates (April 9-12, 2026), typically implies an urgent need. The primary risks include potentially higher costs due to expedited fulfillment requirements, limited vendor availability willing or able to meet such a tight deadline, and a reduced opportunity for thorough vetting of the vendor or product. This short timeframe might also suggest reactive procurement rather than proactive inventory management, which could lead to recurring urgent needs and associated inefficiencies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Warehousing and Storage › Other Warehousing and Storage

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 MARINA PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220, BOSTON, MA, 02210

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,124

Exercised Options: $5,124

Current Obligation: $5,124

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSCC25D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline