GSA awards $4.5M contract for paper, xerographic supplies to Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,488 ($4.5K)

Contractor: Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-04-11

Contract Duration: 3 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PAPER, XEROGRAPHIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4,487.7 to NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC for work described as: PAPER, XEROGRAPHIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential office supplies, indicating ongoing need for basic operational materials. 2. Limited competition suggests potential for higher pricing than a fully competed contract. 3. Short contract duration (3 months) may indicate a need for immediate supply or a pilot program. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor for cost overruns. 5. Contractor has been awarded this delivery order, suggesting past performance or existing relationship. 6. The specific nature of 'paper, xerographic' points to a niche but critical supply chain component.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $4.5 million for a 3-month period for paper and xerographic supplies appears high on a monthly basis. Without specific details on the quantity and type of supplies, a direct comparison to similar contracts is difficult. However, the cost per month ($1.5 million) warrants scrutiny to ensure it aligns with market rates for bulk office supply procurement. The fixed-price nature provides cost certainty but doesn't inherently guarantee value for money without benchmarking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded under 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' which typically indicates a sole-source or limited competition scenario. The specific reason for this designation is not provided, but it means the General Services Administration (GSA) did not solicit bids from multiple vendors. This lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces to achieve the lowest possible price and may result in less favorable terms.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without a competitive process, there is less assurance that the government secured the best possible price for these essential supplies.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring paper and xerographic supplies will benefit from this contract, ensuring continuity of operations. The services delivered include the provision of essential office consumables. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting federal offices across various locations. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily affecting procurement and logistics personnel managing the contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced value for taxpayer dollars.
The high monthly expenditure for basic supplies requires justification through detailed quantity and specification data.
The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status needs further clarification to understand the rationale behind bypassing a competitive process.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration, an agency experienced in procurement.
The award is a delivery order, suggesting it might be part of a larger framework or existing contract vehicle.

Sector Analysis

The procurement of office supplies, including paper and xerographic materials, falls under the broader category of general administrative and operational support services. This sector is characterized by a wide range of suppliers, from large distributors to specialized providers. Federal spending in this area is consistent, supporting the day-to-day functions of government agencies. Benchmarking this contract's value would require comparing the unit costs of specific paper types and toner cartridges against government-wide schedules or large commercial contracts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) is not a feature of this specific award. There is no indication of a small business set-aside or subcontracting plan. This means the contract was not specifically targeted to encourage small business involvement, and opportunities for small businesses to participate as prime contractors or subcontractors are likely limited for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified goods. Transparency is dependent on GSA's internal reporting and public contract databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Office Supplies Procurement
General Services Administration Contracts
Warehousing and Storage Services
Federal Supply Schedules

Risk Flags

Limited Competition
Potential for Overpricing
Lack of Detailed Justification for NAF Award
High Monthly Expenditure for Basic Supplies

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4,487.7 to NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC. PAPER, XEROGRAPHIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NOBLE SUPPLY & LOGISTICS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4,487.7.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-04-11.

What specific types and quantities of paper and xerographic supplies are included in this contract, and how do these details justify the $4.5 million value over three months?

The provided data is limited and does not specify the exact types (e.g., copier paper, legal paper, specialty paper) or quantities of paper and xerographic supplies covered by this $4.5 million delivery order. The designation 'PAPER, XEROGRAPHIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL' indicates that a more detailed specification exists but is not included here. Without this detailed breakdown, it is impossible to accurately assess the value proposition. A monthly expenditure of $1.5 million for such supplies is substantial and would typically imply very large volumes or highly specialized, expensive items. To justify this cost, the attached document would need to detail the specific SKUs, quantities, and unit prices, which could then be benchmarked against GSA schedules, commercial price lists, or historical agency spending for similar items.

What is the rationale behind awarding this contract on a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' basis, and what are the implications for price discovery?

The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' (NAF) status signifies that the General Services Administration (GSA) did not conduct a competitive solicitation for this contract. Common reasons for NAF awards include specific emergency requirements, unique capabilities possessed by only one vendor, or when the contract is a modification or extension of an existing sole-source award. The implication for price discovery is significant: without multiple bids, the government loses the primary mechanism for ensuring it receives the best possible price. The negotiated price may not reflect market value, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competed procurement. Further investigation into the specific justification for the NAF status is warranted.

How does Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC's track record with the GSA influence this award, and what is their performance history?

The award of a delivery order to Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC suggests a pre-existing relationship or a positive assessment of their capabilities by the GSA. However, the provided data does not include specific details about Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC's past performance metrics, contract history, or any quality ratings with the GSA or other federal agencies. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their performance on previous contracts, including on-time delivery, product quality, responsiveness to issues, and overall customer satisfaction. A strong track record could justify a sole-source or limited competition award, but without concrete performance data, it remains an assumption.

What is the typical annual spending for paper and xerographic supplies across the federal government, and how does this $4.5 million contract compare?

Federal spending on office supplies, including paper and xerographic materials, is substantial and distributed across numerous agencies and contract vehicles. While a precise aggregate figure for 'paper, xerographic' is not readily available without deep dives into federal procurement data systems like FPDS or SAM.gov, agencies collectively spend billions annually on general office supplies. This $4.5 million contract, though significant for a 3-month period, represents a fraction of the total federal expenditure. To contextualize it, one would compare its monthly burn rate ($1.5 million) against average monthly spending by similar-sized agencies or across specific GSA schedules for these items. It highlights a concentrated procurement effort for a specific need within a defined timeframe.

Are there any specific risks associated with this contract, such as supply chain disruptions or quality control issues, given the nature of the products and the limited competition?

Risks associated with this contract include potential supply chain disruptions, especially if Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC relies on a narrow base of manufacturers or faces logistical challenges. Given the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status, there's also a risk of suboptimal pricing. Quality control is another concern; without competitive pressure, the incentive to maintain high quality might be reduced, although contractual terms and GSA oversight should mitigate this. The short duration could also indicate an urgent need, potentially increasing pressure and risk if the contractor fails to deliver on time or to specification. The lack of transparency regarding the NAF justification adds an inherent risk of not fully understanding the procurement's necessity or fairness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Warehousing and Storage › Other Warehousing and Storage

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 MARINA PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220, BOSTON, MA, 02210

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,488

Exercised Options: $4,488

Current Obligation: $4,488

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSCC25D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline