General Services Administration awards $298K for automotive repair, highlighting a competitive procurement for essential vehicle maintenance

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,878 ($29.9K)

Contractor: Mission Support & Test Services LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-05-29

Contract Duration: 58 days

Daily Burn Rate: $515/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AUTOMOTIVE MECHANICAL REPAIRS / ENGINE REPLACEMENT, TURBO AND FUEL SYSTEM

Place of Performance

Location: NORTH LAS VEGAS, CLARK County, NEVADA, 89030

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $29,878.14 to MISSION SUPPORT & TEST SERVICES LLC for work described as: AUTOMOTIVE MECHANICAL REPAIRS / ENGINE REPLACEMENT, TURBO AND FUEL SYSTEM Key points: 1. The contract value is modest, suggesting a focus on specific repair needs rather than large-scale fleet management. 2. Procurement through the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) indicates a streamlined process for smaller dollar value acquisitions. 3. The fixed-price contract type transfers risk to the contractor, ensuring cost certainty for the government. 4. The short duration of the contract (58 days) points to an immediate need for services. 5. The award to MISSION SUPPORT & TEST SERVICES LLC suggests a reliance on specialized service providers for vehicle upkeep.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $298,781 for automotive mechanical repairs, including engine replacement, turbo, and fuel systems, appears reasonable for specialized services. Benchmarking against similar contracts is challenging without more specific details on the scope of work and the exact nature of the repairs. However, the fixed-price nature of the award suggests that the government has negotiated a set cost, which is generally a positive indicator for value, assuming the contractor's bid was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically allows for broader competition for acquisitions below certain thresholds. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP is designed to encourage competition. The fact that it was competed suggests that multiple vendors were likely aware of and had the opportunity to bid on this requirement, which generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competed contract, even under SAP, generally results in better pricing for taxpayers compared to sole-source awards, as it leverages market forces to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Federal agencies operating vehicles in Nevada will benefit from maintained operational readiness. Essential automotive repair and engine services will be delivered to ensure vehicle functionality. The geographic impact is focused on Nevada, where the services will be performed. The contract supports specialized automotive technicians and mechanics within the service provider's workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of specific details on the number of bidders limits a full assessment of competitive intensity.
  • The short contract duration might indicate a reactive need, potentially leading to higher costs if not managed proactively.
  • No information is provided on the contractor's past performance specifically for this type of complex repair.

Positive Signals

  • The contract was competed, indicating an effort to secure competitive pricing.
  • The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
  • The award falls under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures, suggesting efficient procurement for a moderate value.

Sector Analysis

The automotive repair and maintenance sector is a critical component of the broader transportation and logistics industry. Federal agencies rely heavily on a well-maintained vehicle fleet to carry out their missions. Spending in this area is often driven by the need for specialized services, such as engine overhauls or complex system repairs, which may not be handled by in-house government maintenance facilities. The General Services Administration (GSA) often facilitates these types of procurements to ensure agencies have access to necessary services efficiently.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) and was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is identified, there is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans or opportunities for small businesses within this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting goals were established or met.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is a Purchase Order, a common instrument for simplified acquisitions. Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the agency utilizing the services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if fraud or significant mismanagement were suspected, but standard oversight focuses on performance and adherence to contract terms.

Related Government Programs

  • Fleet Vehicle Maintenance
  • Automotive Repair Services
  • Engine Repair and Overhaul
  • Vehicle Parts and Supplies
  • General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns if contractor underestimates complexity under FFP.
  • Limited visibility into specific number of bidders impacts full competition assessment.
  • Short contract duration may indicate reactive procurement rather than proactive fleet management.

Tags

automotive-repair, engine-replacement, turbo-repair, fuel-system-repair, general-services-administration, mission-support-test-services-llc, simplified-acquisition-procedures, purchase-order, firm-fixed-price, nevada, vehicle-maintenance, federal-acquisition-service

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $29,878.14 to MISSION SUPPORT & TEST SERVICES LLC. AUTOMOTIVE MECHANICAL REPAIRS / ENGINE REPLACEMENT, TURBO AND FUEL SYSTEM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISSION SUPPORT & TEST SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29,878.14.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-05-29.

What is the typical cost range for similar automotive mechanical repair services, including engine and turbo replacements, awarded by the federal government?

Determining a precise cost range for "AUTOMOTIVE MECHANICAL REPAIRS / ENGINE REPLACEMENT, TURBO AND FUEL SYSTEM" is complex due to the highly variable nature of such services. Factors like the specific make and model of vehicles, the extent of the damage or required work (e.g., complete engine rebuild vs. component replacement), labor rates in the specific geographic location (Nevada in this case), and the urgency of the repair all significantly influence cost. Federal contracts for such services can range from a few thousand dollars for routine maintenance or minor repairs to tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars for major overhauls or fleet-wide service agreements. The $298,781 awarded here for a 58-day period suggests a substantial scope of work, potentially involving multiple vehicles or complex, high-value repairs like turbocharger or fuel system overhauls, placing it in the mid-to-upper range for individual service awards but potentially lower than large, multi-year fleet maintenance contracts.

How does the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) process typically influence the competitiveness and pricing of contracts like this one?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed for purchases generally valued at or below the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000, though this can be higher for certain types of acquisitions). These procedures streamline the acquisition process, making it faster and less burdensome than full and open competition for larger contracts. For contracts within the SAP threshold, agencies are encouraged to solicit offers from an adequate number of qualified sources to ensure price competition. While the specific number of bidders isn't detailed here, the use of SAP implies that the government sought multiple quotes or proposals. This competition, even in a simplified format, generally leads to more competitive pricing for taxpayers compared to sole-source awards. However, the level of competition can vary, and the reduced administrative burden might sometimes result in slightly higher prices than might be achieved through a more extensive, formal bidding process for very large contracts.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for specialized automotive repairs?

Firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally favored for their cost certainty, as the price is set regardless of the contractor's actual costs. For specialized automotive repairs, the primary risk for the government under an FFP contract is that the contractor may have underestimated the complexity or cost of the work. If the contractor encounters unforeseen issues or the scope of work expands beyond their initial estimate, they bear the financial burden. This can incentivize contractors to either inflate their initial bids to cover potential risks or, in extreme cases, lead to disputes, delays, or even contractor default if the work becomes unprofitable. Conversely, the government benefits from predictable costs, assuming the initial bid was fair and competitive. The risk for the government is primarily paying a potentially higher price than necessary if the contractor's risk assessment was overly conservative.

Can the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) effectively manage specialized automotive repair contracts across diverse geographic locations?

The GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is designed to provide centralized procurement solutions and expertise to federal agencies, including managing a wide array of services like automotive repair. FAS leverages its purchasing power and contracting professionals to establish schedules and contract vehicles that agencies can use. For specialized services like engine and turbo system repairs, FAS likely relies on pre-vetted contractors who meet specific technical qualifications. While this particular award is for services in Nevada, FAS manages contracts that can be accessed by agencies nationwide. The effectiveness of managing such contracts hinges on clear performance work statements, robust oversight by Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs), and the ability of FAS to identify and contract with qualified, reliable service providers capable of meeting diverse agency needs across different regions.

What does the 'NV' (Nevada) designation for 'st' (State) imply about the potential geographic scope and utilization of this contract?

The 'NV' designation for the state indicates that the contract is associated with or will be performed in Nevada. This suggests that the primary beneficiary agency or the location where the automotive repair services will be rendered is within Nevada. For federal agencies operating fleets or facilities in Nevada, this contract provides a direct source for essential vehicle maintenance and repair. It implies that the General Services Administration, through its Federal Acquisition Service, has identified a need within that specific geographic area and has procured services accordingly. While the contract itself might be awarded by GSA, its utilization is likely by federal entities physically present or operating within Nevada, ensuring the operational readiness of their vehicles in that region.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Other Services (except Public Administration)Automotive Repair and MaintenanceGeneral Automotive Repair

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2621 LOSEE RD, NORTH LAS VEGAS, NV, 89030

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,878

Exercised Options: $29,878

Current Obligation: $29,878

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-01

Current End Date: 2026-05-29

Potential End Date: 2026-05-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-01

More Contracts from Mission Support & Test Services LLC

View all Mission Support & Test Services LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending