GSA awards $1.38M contract for construction machinery manufacturing to American Material Handling, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $138,137 ($138.1K)

Contractor: American Material Handling, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-10-05

Contract Duration: 180 days

Daily Burn Rate: $767/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 999

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Construction

Official Description: MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULES (MAS)

Place of Performance

Location: WATKINSVILLE, OCONEE County, GEORGIA, 30677

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $138,137 to AMERICAN MATERIAL HANDLING, INC. for work described as: MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULES (MAS) Key points: 1. Contract awarded via GSA Multiple Award Schedules (MAS), indicating pre-competed services. 2. Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) contract type introduces potential for cost fluctuations. 3. Delivery Order (DO) signifies a specific task within a larger MAS contract. 4. Contract duration of 180 days suggests a short-term, focused requirement. 5. No small business set-aside noted, potentially limiting direct opportunities for smaller firms. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 333120 points to a specific manufacturing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.38 million for construction machinery manufacturing appears moderate for a federal procurement. Benchmarking against similar delivery orders under GSA MAS would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. The Fixed Price with EPA clause warrants careful monitoring to ensure costs do not escalate beyond reasonable market fluctuations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under the General Services Administration's (GSA) Multiple Award Schedules (MAS), which is a full and open competition vehicle. This means that all responsible sources were permitted to compete for the underlying MAS contract. The specific delivery order was likely placed against an existing MAS contract, implying that competition occurred at the MAS contract level.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers, as multiple vendors are incentivized to offer competitive pricing.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring construction machinery will benefit from the services provided under this contract. The contract supports the manufacturing and supply of construction machinery. Geographic impact is likely national, as GSA MAS contracts can be accessed by agencies across the United States. Workforce implications may include jobs in manufacturing and logistics related to construction machinery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost increases due to the Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause.
Limited visibility into the specific performance metrics and quality standards for the machinery.
The contract is a Delivery Order, meaning its scope is defined within a broader MAS contract, potentially limiting direct oversight of the specific requirement.

Positive Signals

Awarded under GSA MAS, indicating the contractor has already met stringent requirements for inclusion.
Full and open competition at the MAS contract level suggests a competitive bidding process.
Fixed Price contract type provides a baseline cost certainty, despite the EPA.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Construction Machinery Manufacturing sector, classified under NAICS code 333120. This sector is crucial for infrastructure development and construction projects. Spending in this area is often tied to federal infrastructure initiatives and agency operational needs. Benchmarking would involve comparing this award to other federal procurements for similar machinery, considering factors like quantity, specifications, and delivery terms.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and the contractor, American Material Handling, Inc., is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. This suggests that opportunities for small businesses may be limited to subcontracting roles, if any, and that the primary award was made to a larger entity. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting plans are in place to engage small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is primarily managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. As a Delivery Order under a MAS contract, the underlying MAS contract itself undergoes regular review. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would typically fall under the GSA OIG for any potential fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Multiple Award Schedules (MAS)
Construction Machinery and Equipment Procurement
Federal Infrastructure Spending

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause introduces cost uncertainty.
Limited data on contractor's specific performance history for this type of machinery.
Potential for non-compliance with delivery schedules or quality specifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $138,137 to AMERICAN MATERIAL HANDLING, INC.. MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULES (MAS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMERICAN MATERIAL HANDLING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $138,137.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-10-05.

What is the historical spending pattern for American Material Handling, Inc. with the federal government?

Analyzing the historical spending of American Material Handling, Inc. with the federal government requires access to a comprehensive federal procurement database. Without direct access to such data, it's difficult to provide specific figures. However, the fact that they hold a GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) contract suggests they have successfully navigated the federal procurement process previously and have likely been awarded other contracts or delivery orders. Federal agencies often award contracts to vendors with a proven track record. A deeper dive would involve querying databases like FPDS or SAM.gov for all contract actions awarded to this entity, examining the types of goods/services procured, the agencies involved, and the total dollar value over time. This would help establish a baseline for their federal business and assess their experience level.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar procurements for construction machinery?

A direct comparison of pricing for this $1.38 million contract to similar procurements requires access to detailed pricing data for comparable federal contracts. The provided data indicates a Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) contract type. The 'value for money' assessment hinges on whether the negotiated prices are competitive within the market for the specific type and quantity of construction machinery being procured. Benchmarking would involve identifying other federal or state government contracts for similar machinery awarded around the same period, considering factors such as manufacturer, model, specifications, quantity, delivery location, and contract terms. Without this comparative data, it's challenging to definitively state if the pricing is advantageous or disadvantageous to the government. The EPA clause also introduces a variable element that needs careful monitoring against market indices.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential cost escalation due to the Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause, which allows for price changes based on specified economic factors. Another risk could be performance-related, such as delays in delivery or machinery not meeting required specifications, although the contractor's presence on GSA MAS suggests a level of vetting. Mitigation strategies for the EPA risk involve careful monitoring of the economic indices tied to the adjustment clause and ensuring that the adjustments remain within reasonable market fluctuations. Performance risks are typically mitigated through contract clauses that define delivery schedules, quality standards, and remedies for non-performance. The GSA's oversight of MAS contracts also provides a layer of risk management, as contractors must maintain compliance to remain on the schedule.

What is the expected program effectiveness or impact of this contract on federal operations?

The expected program effectiveness of this contract is centered on ensuring federal agencies have access to necessary construction machinery. This machinery is vital for a range of activities, including infrastructure maintenance, construction projects, disaster response, and general facility upkeep. By providing this equipment, the contract directly supports the operational capabilities of agencies that rely on such tools. The effectiveness will be measured by the timely delivery of reliable machinery that meets the specified requirements, thereby enabling agencies to execute their missions efficiently. A successful outcome means that the procured machinery contributes to the completion of projects, the maintenance of assets, and the overall functioning of government operations without significant disruption or cost overruns.

How does this contract align with broader federal spending priorities in the construction machinery sector?

This contract aligns with federal spending priorities by supporting the acquisition of essential equipment for infrastructure development and maintenance. Federal agencies, such as the Department of Defense, Department of the Interior, and GSA itself, often require construction machinery for various projects, from building and repairing facilities to managing public lands. Spending in this sector is often influenced by infrastructure investment initiatives and the need to maintain and upgrade government assets. The procurement through GSA MAS indicates an efficient method for agencies to acquire these goods, suggesting alignment with priorities for streamlined procurement. The specific machinery procured would dictate its direct contribution to priorities like transportation infrastructure, facility modernization, or emergency preparedness.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Agriculture, Construction, and Mining Machinery Manufacturing › Construction Machinery Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT/MINE/EXCAVATE/HIGHWY EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QSMD20R0001

Offers Received: 999

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3651 MARS HILL RD, WATKINSVILLE, GA, 30677

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $138,137

Exercised Options: $138,137

Current Obligation: $138,137

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA18D000G

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline