GSA awards $20M landscape architecture contract to Booz Allen Hamilton for services through 2027

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,072,231 ($20.1M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-01-20

End Date: 2027-01-19

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $55.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: B52 SPO B1 SPO CERP WEAPONS WLCMT

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73145

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $20.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: B52 SPO B1 SPO CERP WEAPONS WLCMT Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of landscape architectural services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of one year with potential for extensions warrants monitoring. 4. Services are geographically focused on Oklahoma. 5. The contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $20 million for a one-year period seems within a reasonable range for comprehensive landscape architectural services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government contracts for design and planning services indicates that this award is competitive. The pricing structure, likely based on labor hours and material costs, will be a key factor in assessing overall value for money as the contract progresses.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests a robust process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for cost savings and higher quality services due to a competitive bidding environment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal agencies requiring landscape architectural expertise. Services delivered include design, planning, and potentially oversight of landscape projects. Geographic impact is concentrated in Oklahoma. The contract may support a workforce of landscape architects and related professionals.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if project requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single awardee for a significant duration could limit flexibility.
Ensuring fair labor practices and compensation for subcontracted work.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and transparent process.
Contract duration allows for continuity of services and project completion.
Focus on a specific geographic area may lead to specialized expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically landscape architectural services. This sector is crucial for government infrastructure and development projects. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar architectural and engineering services often range from millions to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on project scale and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The contract details do not indicate a specific small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, may engage small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. Analysis of subcontracting plans will be crucial to understand the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures will be tied to contract performance, delivery schedules, and adherence to scope. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases and reporting requirements.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings and Grounds
Architectural and Engineering Services
Public Works Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for contractor performance issues.
Risk of cost overruns due to undefined scope.
Dependency on contractor's specialized expertise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $20.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. B52 SPO B1 SPO CERP WEAPONS WLCMT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-20. End: 2027-01-19.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with similar landscape architecture contracts?

Booz Allen Hamilton is a large, well-established government contractor primarily known for its expertise in management consulting, technology, and engineering services. While they have a broad portfolio, their specific experience in landscape architecture contracts of this scale may be less prominent compared to specialized firms. A review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving design, planning, and environmental services, would be necessary to fully assess their capabilities and track record in this niche area. Their ability to manage complex projects and deliver on time and within budget across various domains suggests a strong potential for success, but specific landscape architecture project outcomes would require deeper investigation.

How does the $20 million award compare to historical spending on landscape architecture services by the GSA?

Historical spending data for landscape architectural services by the GSA can provide valuable context for this $20 million award. Analyzing past contract values, durations, and the number of bidders for similar services over the last 5-10 years would reveal trends and benchmarks. If previous contracts of comparable scope were awarded for significantly lower amounts, it might suggest this award is on the higher end. Conversely, if similar projects have historically cost more, this award could represent good value. Without specific historical data points for GSA's landscape architecture procurements, it's challenging to definitively benchmark this $20 million award, but it represents a substantial investment in this service area.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract?

Key risk indicators for this contract include the potential for scope creep, where project requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns and schedule delays. The one-year base duration, while standard, necessitates careful management to ensure continuity and avoid gaps in service if extensions are needed. Another risk is the contractor's specific expertise in landscape architecture; while Booz Allen Hamilton is a large firm, their depth in this specialized field compared to dedicated landscape architecture firms warrants attention. Finally, ensuring effective oversight and performance management by the GSA is critical to mitigate risks related to service quality and adherence to project objectives.

How effective is the full and open competition process in ensuring value for money for landscape architectural services?

The full and open competition process is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for landscape architectural services by fostering a competitive environment. It allows a wide range of qualified firms to bid, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. However, the effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the number of responsive bidders. If the solicitation is poorly defined or if only a few firms can realistically compete due to specialized requirements, the intended benefits of open competition may be diminished. For landscape architecture, where design quality and specific expertise are paramount, ensuring that evaluation criteria adequately balance price with technical merit is crucial for achieving true value.

What are the potential workforce implications of this contract award?

This contract award to Booz Allen Hamilton has several potential workforce implications. Firstly, it could lead to direct employment opportunities within Booz Allen Hamilton for landscape architects, urban planners, environmental scientists, and project managers. Secondly, as a large prime contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton is likely to subcontract portions of the work, creating opportunities for smaller, specialized landscape architecture firms and individual consultants. This can foster growth within the small business sector. The geographic focus on Oklahoma means that local talent and firms in that region may see increased demand for their services. The overall impact will depend on the specific tasks delegated and the contractor's subcontracting strategy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Landscape Architectural Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFWA25Q0004

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $72,675,243

Exercised Options: $35,500,334

Current Obligation: $20,072,231

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRCA25DU052

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline