GSA awards $3.1M environmental consulting contract to Stantec GS Inc. for Texas-based EIS

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,099,711 ($3.1M)

Contractor: Stantec GS Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-09-29

End Date: 2027-09-28

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT EIS

Place of Performance

Location: JBSA LACKLAND, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78236

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.1 million to STANTEC GS INC. for work described as: SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT EIS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year environmental impact statement project. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Project duration of 4 years aligns with typical EIS timelines. 5. Focus on environmental consulting services indicates a specialized need. 6. Geographic focus on Texas may imply specific regional environmental concerns.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.1 million for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) over four years appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized consulting services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale EIS projects, which can often run into millions of dollars depending on complexity and scope, suggests this award is competitive. The firm fixed-price structure further supports value by capping the government's financial exposure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. While the exact number of bidders is not provided, this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is expected to drive down prices and improve the quality of proposals. The agency's commitment to open competition suggests a thorough evaluation process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the government's investment in environmental consulting services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal agencies requiring environmental impact assessments for proposed projects. Services delivered include expert analysis and documentation for environmental compliance. The geographic impact is focused on Texas, addressing potential environmental concerns within the state. Workforce implications include the engagement of specialized environmental consultants and analysts.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
Potential for scope creep if the EIS requirements evolve significantly.
Dependence on contractor expertise for accurate environmental assessments.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract limits cost uncertainty.
Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Contract duration aligns with the typical lifecycle of an EIS.

Sector Analysis

The environmental consulting sector is a critical component of regulatory compliance and project development across various industries. This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services category, specifically focusing on environmental services. The market for EIS preparation is driven by federal and state regulations requiring environmental reviews for major projects. Spending in this area can fluctuate based on infrastructure development and policy changes, but typically represents a significant portion of government contracting for environmental compliance.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract. As a firm fixed-price award under full and open competition, the primary focus appears to be on securing specialized expertise. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if there were opportunities missed for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance monitoring details are not publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Impact Statements
Environmental Consulting Services
Federal Environmental Regulations
Project Management Consulting

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Reliance on contractor expertise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.1 million to STANTEC GS INC.. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT EIS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STANTEC GS INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-29. End: 2027-09-28.

What is the track record of Stantec GS Inc. in delivering similar environmental consulting services for federal agencies?

Stantec GS Inc. is a well-established firm with a broad range of environmental consulting capabilities. While specific details on their past performance for the General Services Administration (GSA) on Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SEIS) are not provided in this data snippet, the company generally has a significant portfolio of work in environmental assessment, planning, and compliance across various sectors. Federal agencies often rely on large, experienced firms like Stantec for complex environmental reviews due to their established methodologies, technical expertise, and capacity to handle large-scale projects. A deeper dive into federal contract databases and past performance reviews would be necessary to fully assess their specific track record relevant to this particular contract's scope and requirements.

How does the $3.1 million award compare to the average cost of similar Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements?

The $3.1 million award for a four-year Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) appears to be within a reasonable range, considering the complexity and duration typical of such projects. SEIS costs can vary significantly based on the scope of the project, the environmental sensitivities involved, the level of analysis required, and the specific regulatory framework. Large-scale infrastructure projects or those with potentially significant environmental impacts often necessitate extensive studies that can easily cost several million dollars. Without knowing the specific details of the project in Texas requiring this SEIS, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, for a multi-year federal environmental review, this figure suggests a competitive award, especially given it was procured through full and open competition.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential scope creep, where the requirements for the SEIS may expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost and schedule overruns. Another risk is the reliance on the contractor's expertise; if the analysis is flawed or incomplete, it could lead to regulatory issues or project delays. Mitigation strategies are in place: the firm fixed-price contract structure limits the government's financial exposure to cost overruns, provided the scope remains unchanged. The GSA's oversight and the competitive bidding process aim to ensure the selection of a qualified contractor capable of delivering accurate and timely results. Clear contract deliverables and performance standards are crucial for managing scope and quality.

What is the historical spending pattern for environmental consulting services by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending data for environmental consulting services by the General Services Administration (GSA) would reveal trends in their procurement of such services. GSA, as a major federal procurement agency, contracts for a wide array of services, including environmental consulting, to support its own operations and those of other federal agencies. Analyzing past spending would show the volume and value of contracts awarded in this category, the types of services most frequently procured (e.g., EIS, site assessments, remediation planning), and the primary contractors. This information helps in understanding GSA's commitment to environmental compliance and its reliance on external expertise. Without specific historical data, it's assumed that spending fluctuates with federal initiatives, infrastructure projects, and regulatory changes impacting environmental reviews.

How does the geographic focus on Texas influence the scope and potential challenges of this environmental consulting contract?

The geographic focus on Texas for this Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) means the consulting services must address the specific environmental regulations, ecological conditions, and potential impacts relevant to that state. Texas has diverse environmental concerns, including water resources, air quality, coastal issues, and endangered species, which may require specialized knowledge and data collection. Challenges could arise from navigating state-specific environmental laws in conjunction with federal requirements, potential public engagement complexities unique to the region, and the need for on-the-ground assessments within Texas's varied landscapes. The contractor must demonstrate familiarity with these regional factors to effectively conduct the SEIS.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFWA23Q0036

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Stantec Consulting Michigan Inc.

Address: 2496 OLD IVY RD STE 300, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA, 22903

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,099,711

Exercised Options: $3,099,711

Current Obligation: $3,099,711

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F196CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline