GSA awards $5.3M contract to Sustainment & Restoration Services for environmental services at three Air Force bases

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,335,766 ($5.3M)

Contractor: Sustainment & Restoration Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-08-01

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,003 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: F2F ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR MAFB MHAFB AND FAFB

Place of Performance

Location: MALMSTROM AFB, CASCADE County, MONTANA, 59402

State: Montana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $5.3 million to SUSTAINMENT & RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC for work described as: F2F ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR MAFB MHAFB AND FAFB Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating clear cost expectations. 2. Limited competition due to the nature of the requirement, potentially impacting price. 3. Contract duration of approximately 2.8 years suggests a need for ongoing environmental support. 4. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, raising questions about broader economic impact. 5. Environmental consulting services are critical for base operations and compliance. 6. The award value of $5.3M falls within a typical range for such specialized services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $5.3 million for environmental services over nearly three years appears reasonable given the scope of supporting three Air Force bases (MAFB, MHAFB, FAFB). Benchmarking against similar environmental consulting contracts for federal facilities suggests this award is within the expected range. However, without detailed task breakdowns or performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded on a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' basis, indicating limited or no competition. This typically occurs when specific circumstances, such as urgent needs, unique capabilities, or the existence of only one responsible source, prevent a full and open solicitation. The lack of competition means that price discovery through market forces was not fully utilized, potentially leading to a higher price than if multiple bids were received.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the benefit of the lowest possible price due to the limited competition. The government's ability to negotiate favorable terms is reduced when only one contractor is considered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the three Air Force bases (MAFB, MHAFB, FAFB) receiving essential environmental management and consulting services. Services include environmental compliance, sustainment, and restoration activities crucial for base operations. The geographic impact is concentrated in Montana, where the bases are located. The contract supports specialized environmental consulting roles, potentially impacting the local workforce in Montana.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and lack of innovation.
Lack of small business set-aside may limit opportunities for smaller firms in the environmental sector.
Contract duration and value require careful monitoring to ensure continued value for money.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Award to a single contractor suggests specialized expertise relevant to the bases' needs.
Contract addresses critical environmental sustainment and restoration requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Consulting Services sector (NAICS 541620). This sector provides expertise in environmental impact assessments, remediation, compliance, and management. Federal spending in this area is significant, driven by regulatory requirements and the need to manage environmental liabilities at government facilities. Comparable contracts often involve long-term support for large installations, with values varying widely based on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the 'sb' field is false, indicating no specific small business participation was mandated at the prime contract level. This means Sustainment & Restoration Services, LLC, is the prime contractor, and any subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would be at their discretion. This could limit the direct economic benefit to the small business ecosystem within the environmental services sector for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service (FAS). As a definitive contract, it is subject to standard federal procurement regulations and oversight. The firm-fixed-price nature simplifies some aspects of financial oversight, but performance monitoring remains crucial. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Base Operations Support Contracts
Environmental Compliance Consulting
Federal Facility Management

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price.
Contract performance requires diligent oversight.
Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $5.3 million to SUSTAINMENT & RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC. F2F ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR MAFB MHAFB AND FAFB

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SUSTAINMENT & RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-01. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the track record of Sustainment & Restoration Services, LLC with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense or GSA?

Sustainment & Restoration Services, LLC has a history of performing federal contracts, primarily focused on environmental services and facility maintenance. While specific details on their track record with the Department of Defense or GSA require deeper database analysis, their ability to secure this contract suggests they meet the necessary qualifications and past performance requirements. Analyzing their past performance ratings, contract modifications, and any disputes or terminations would provide a more comprehensive view of their reliability and capability in executing similar environmental projects for federal agencies.

How does the awarded value of $5.3 million compare to similar environmental consulting contracts for Air Force bases?

The $5.3 million award for approximately 2.8 years of environmental services across three Air Force bases (MAFB, MHAFB, FAFB) appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized federal facility support. Contracts for environmental consulting and sustainment services at military installations can vary significantly based on the scope of work, geographic location, and specific environmental challenges. For instance, contracts involving extensive remediation or complex compliance monitoring often exceed this value. Conversely, simpler base support contracts might be lower. Without a detailed breakdown of the services required under this specific contract, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value suggests a moderate scope of work.

What are the primary risks associated with a 'not available for competition' contract award for environmental services?

The primary risk associated with a 'not available for competition' award is the potential for reduced value for money due to the absence of competitive bidding. This can lead to higher prices than might be achieved in an open market. Additionally, limited competition may reduce the incentive for the contractor to innovate or provide exceptional service, as alternative options for the government are scarce. There's also a risk that the government may not have access to the absolute best-suited solution if other capable contractors were excluded from bidding. Transparency and justification for the sole-source or limited-source nature of the award are critical to mitigate these risks.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) likely used to measure the effectiveness of these environmental services?

Key performance indicators for this environmental services contract would likely focus on compliance, timeliness, and cost control. Examples include adherence to environmental regulations (e.g., EPA standards, RCRA), successful completion of environmental assessments and reports by specified deadlines, effective management of hazardous materials, timely response to environmental incidents, and maintaining project costs within the firm-fixed-price budget. Performance metrics might also include the number of environmental compliance issues identified and resolved, and the overall environmental health and safety status of the supported bases. Regular performance reviews by GSA would assess the contractor's achievement against these KPIs.

How has federal spending on environmental consulting services for military bases trended over the past five years?

Federal spending on environmental consulting services for military bases has generally remained robust over the past five years, driven by ongoing compliance requirements, infrastructure sustainment, and legacy environmental cleanup efforts. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on budget allocations and emerging needs, the Department of Defense consistently represents a significant portion of this spending. Trends indicate a continued focus on areas such as renewable energy integration, cybersecurity for environmental systems, and advanced remediation technologies. Spending levels are influenced by legislative mandates, environmental regulations, and the overall defense budget, often showing steady or slightly increasing patterns.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 47QFWA23R0013

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1033 N MAYFAIR RD, MILWAUKEE, WI, 53226

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,768,494

Exercised Options: $5,768,494

Current Obligation: $5,335,766

Actual Outlays: $3,154,646

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline