GSA awards $18.3M for Microsoft Defender licenses to Minburn Technology Group, a sole-source BPA call

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,278,400 ($18.3M)

Contractor: Minburn Technology Group, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-06-13

End Date: 2026-06-12

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $50.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: DISA MICROSOFT DEFENDER FOR ENDPOINT P2(MDE)_MICROSOFT DEFENDER FOR IDENTITY (MDI) SUBSCRIPTION LICENSES

Place of Performance

Location: GREAT FALLS, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22066

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $18.3 million to MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC for work described as: DISA MICROSOFT DEFENDER FOR ENDPOINT P2(MDE)_MICROSOFT DEFENDER FOR IDENTITY (MDI) SUBSCRIPTION LICENSES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in endpoint and identity security solutions. 2. The award was made via a BPA call, suggesting a pre-negotiated framework. 3. Limited competition is indicated by the BPA call mechanism, potentially impacting price. 4. The contract duration is one year, with an option to extend. 5. Focus on Microsoft Defender products suggests a standardized approach to cybersecurity. 6. The contract supports federal agencies' need for robust cybersecurity tools.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $18.3 million for one year of Microsoft Defender licenses appears to be within a reasonable range for enterprise-level cybersecurity subscriptions. However, without specific details on the number of users or endpoints covered, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar government-wide agreements or large enterprise purchases of these specific Microsoft products would provide a clearer picture of whether this represents competitive pricing or if alternative solutions could offer better value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded as a BPA call under an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. While the BPA itself may have been competed, the call order process often involves fewer bidders or is directed to specific vendors. This limited competition structure can streamline procurement but may not always yield the lowest possible prices compared to a full and open competition for the specific requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not benefit from the most competitive pricing due to the limited competition inherent in a BPA call award, potentially leading to higher costs than if the requirement were re-competed broadly.

Public Impact

Federal agencies utilizing Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Identity will benefit from enhanced cybersecurity. The services delivered include subscription licenses for critical security software. The geographic impact is nationwide, supporting federal IT infrastructure across the US. Workforce implications include enabling IT security personnel to manage and respond to threats more effectively.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Software Publishers industry, specifically focusing on cybersecurity solutions. The market for endpoint detection and response (EDR) and identity protection software is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, dominated by major technology providers. Federal spending in this sector is substantial, driven by increasing cyber threats and the need to protect sensitive government data. This contract represents a portion of that broader federal investment in cybersecurity software.

Small Business Impact

The award to Minburn Technology Group, LLC, does not appear to be a small business set-aside, as indicated by 'sb': false. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal, unless Minburn Technology Group voluntarily engages small businesses in its supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it, cybersecurity, software-licensing, gsa, federal-acquisition-service, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, microsoft-defender, endpoint-security, identity-security, minburn-technology-group, national

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $18.3 million to MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC. DISA MICROSOFT DEFENDER FOR ENDPOINT P2(MDE)_MICROSOFT DEFENDER FOR IDENTITY (MDI) SUBSCRIPTION LICENSES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-13. End: 2026-06-12.

What is the track record of Minburn Technology Group, LLC in delivering similar cybersecurity solutions to the federal government?

Minburn Technology Group, LLC has a history of providing IT solutions and services to the federal government. While specific details on their track record with Microsoft Defender products are not immediately available from this data alone, their presence as a contractor suggests experience in the federal IT procurement landscape. Further investigation into their past performance on similar contracts, including customer satisfaction ratings and successful delivery of complex IT solutions, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment. Their ability to secure this contract indicates they meet certain baseline requirements set by GSA.

How does the pricing of this Microsoft Defender subscription compare to other federal or commercial agreements for similar quantities?

Direct comparison of pricing is challenging without knowing the exact number of licenses, user types, and specific features included in this $18.3 million award. However, given it's a BPA call, the pricing is likely based on pre-negotiated rates within the parent BPA. To benchmark, one would need to compare the per-unit cost (e.g., per user, per endpoint) against publicly available GSA Schedule pricing for Microsoft licenses, other agency-specific Microsoft Enterprise Agreements, or commercial enterprise pricing from Microsoft or authorized resellers. If this BPA call pricing is significantly higher than comparable agreements, it suggests a potential lack of aggressive price negotiation or limited market research.

What are the primary risks associated with relying on a single vendor's cybersecurity suite like Microsoft Defender?

The primary risks of relying on a single vendor's cybersecurity suite include vendor lock-in, where switching to a different provider becomes technically complex and costly. There's also the risk of a single point of failure; if the vendor experiences a widespread security breach or service outage, it could impact multiple agencies simultaneously. Furthermore, a single-vendor approach might limit access to best-of-breed solutions from specialized security firms that excel in specific niches, potentially leaving gaps in overall security coverage. Over-reliance can also reduce the incentive for the vendor to innovate aggressively if they face minimal competitive pressure within the customer's environment.

How effective are Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Identity in protecting federal agencies against current cyber threats?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) and Microsoft Defender for Identity (MDI) are generally considered robust security solutions that leverage advanced threat detection, investigation, and response capabilities. MDE provides protection against malware, exploits, and other threats on endpoints, while MDI focuses on detecting identity-based attacks within a network. Their effectiveness is often benchmarked against industry standards and independent security testing organizations. However, their efficacy is highly dependent on proper configuration, integration with other security tools, and the skill of the security personnel managing them. Continuous updates and threat intelligence from Microsoft are crucial for staying ahead of evolving threats.

What is the historical spending trend for Microsoft Defender or similar endpoint/identity security solutions by the GSA or other federal agencies?

Historical spending on endpoint and identity security solutions by federal agencies, including through GSA, has been steadily increasing over the past decade due to the escalating cyber threat landscape. Agencies frequently procure licenses for antivirus, EDR, and IAM solutions. GSA's role often involves establishing IDIQ contracts or BPAs that allow agencies to purchase these solutions efficiently. Specific spending on Microsoft Defender products would be part of this larger trend, often consolidated under software licensing categories. Analyzing FPDS data for similar PSC codes and contract types over several years would reveal significant growth in this spending area.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the broader cybersecurity market, particularly for competing solutions?

This contract, while significant in dollar value, represents a specific award for Microsoft products. Its impact on the broader cybersecurity market depends on the scale of deployment and whether it signals a broader shift towards Microsoft's integrated security stack across federal agencies. If many agencies follow suit, it could strengthen Microsoft's market position and potentially make it harder for specialized competitors to gain traction for similar functionalities. Conversely, the federal government often maintains a multi-vendor strategy to avoid lock-in, so this award might be one component of a larger, more diverse cybersecurity portfolio.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationSoftware PublishersSoftware Publishers

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFSA25Q0030

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 9716 ARNON CHAPEL RD, GREAT FALLS, VA, 22066

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $61,267,200

Exercised Options: $18,278,400

Current Obligation: $18,278,400

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCA21A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-06-13

Current End Date: 2026-06-12

Potential End Date: 2028-06-12 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-06

More Contracts from Minburn Technology Group, LLC

View all Minburn Technology Group, LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending