GSA awards $4.26M contract for computer systems design services to SIMETRI, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,260,347 ($4.3M)

Contractor: Simetri, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-05-06

End Date: 2026-05-05

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: SPEARPOINTS PILOT PROGRAM - INITIAL AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32826

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4.3 million to SIMETRI, INC. for work described as: SPEARPOINTS PILOT PROGRAM - INITIAL AWARD Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for computer systems design services, a critical area for federal IT infrastructure. 3. The duration of 1095 days indicates a medium-term project requiring sustained support. 4. The award is a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 5. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, potentially limiting small business participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.26 million over three years for computer systems design services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for IT services indicates that pricing is generally competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost predictability for the government. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process supports a positive outlook.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which implies that while the competition was open, specific sources may have been excluded for defined reasons. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' nature suggests multiple interested parties were likely considered. This level of competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more innovative solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging high-quality service delivery.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring computer systems design and integration services will benefit from this contract. The contract supports the modernization and efficiency of federal IT infrastructure. Services will be delivered within Florida, impacting the local economy and workforce. The contract is expected to support specialized IT roles and potentially create jobs in the technology sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor performance proactively.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause, while potentially justified, warrants scrutiny to ensure fair competition.
Limited information on the specific nature of 'computer systems design services' hinders a deeper analysis of technical risks.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), a reputable agency for federal procurement.
The contract duration allows for sustained support and project completion.

Sector Analysis

The federal IT services market is vast and highly competitive, with agencies increasingly relying on external contractors for specialized expertise in areas like computer systems design. This contract falls within the broader IT professional services sector, which includes a wide range of activities from software development to network management. Spending in this category is driven by the need for agencies to modernize legacy systems, enhance cybersecurity, and adopt cloud technologies. Comparable contracts often range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the complexity and duration.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates no explicit subcontracting requirements for small businesses were mandated in this award. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are limited unless they are prime contractors themselves or are engaged by SIMETRI, INC. on a voluntary basis. The absence of a small business set-aside may reflect the nature of the specialized services required or a strategic decision by the procuring agency.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract, employing various oversight mechanisms including contract performance monitoring and financial reviews. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, it likely adheres to the oversight protocols of that vehicle. Transparency is facilitated through public contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse, with the GSA OIG being the relevant body.

Related Government Programs

GSA IT Schedule 70
IT Professional Services
Computer Systems Design
Federal IT Modernization Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined.
Contractor performance risk if deliverables are not met on time or to standard.
Dependency on a single contractor for critical IT design services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4.3 million to SIMETRI, INC.. SPEARPOINTS PILOT PROGRAM - INITIAL AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIMETRI, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-05-06. End: 2026-05-05.

What is the specific nature of the 'computer systems design services' being procured under this contract?

The contract specifies 'Computer Systems Design Services' under NAICS code 541512. This typically encompasses a broad range of activities including analyzing user needs, designing and developing computer systems, integrating hardware and software, and providing technical consulting. Without further details from the contract statement of work, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact services. However, common applications include designing custom software solutions, planning network architectures, or developing integrated information systems to meet specific agency operational requirements. The General Services Administration (GSA) manages this contract, suggesting it may support agency-wide IT initiatives or specific modernization efforts.

How does the $4.26 million award compare to similar GSA contracts for computer systems design services?

The $4.26 million award for a three-year period for computer systems design services is within a common range for federal IT contracts of this nature. GSA's IT Schedule vehicles, which often host such awards, facilitate competitive pricing. While specific benchmarks require detailed analysis of the Statement of Work (SOW) and deliverables, the firm-fixed-price structure and full and open competition suggest that the pricing is likely competitive. Contracts of similar scope and duration can range from a few hundred thousand to several million dollars, depending on the complexity, required expertise, and specific agency needs. The GSA's role in managing these contracts generally ensures adherence to procurement best practices and fair market pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential scope creep, contractor performance issues, and the possibility of the delivered system not meeting evolving agency needs. Scope creep is mitigated by the firm-fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to adhere to the defined scope. Contractor performance is typically managed through GSA's contract oversight, performance reviews, and adherence to contractual milestones. The risk of the system not meeting needs is addressed through clear requirements definition in the SOW and potentially through iterative development or feedback mechanisms, though specific details on these are not provided. The competitive award process also serves as a risk mitigation by selecting a contractor with a demonstrated capability.

What is SIMETRI, INC.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with the GSA?

SIMETRI, INC. has a history of receiving federal contracts, including awards from the General Services Administration (GSA). Analyzing their past performance data, available through federal procurement databases, would reveal the types of services they have provided, their performance ratings on previous contracts, and their success rate in competitive bidding. A review of their contract history can indicate their experience in delivering IT services, their ability to manage government contracts effectively, and their compliance with federal regulations. This specific award suggests they have met the criteria for this particular computer systems design services requirement.

What is the historical spending trend for computer systems design services by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently awards significant amounts for IT services, including computer systems design. Historical spending data indicates a steady demand for these services as federal agencies modernize their IT infrastructure, enhance cybersecurity, and adopt new technologies. GSA's role as a central procurement agency means it facilitates a large volume of these contracts across various agencies. Trends often show an increasing emphasis on cloud integration, data analytics, and cybersecurity-related design services. The total annual spending by GSA in this category can be in the billions, reflecting the critical nature of IT modernization for government operations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - PLATFORM

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFSA23Q0014

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 937 S. SEMORAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, WINTER PARK, FL, 32792

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,260,347

Exercised Options: $4,260,347

Current Obligation: $4,260,347

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCB22D0217

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline