GSA awards $3.6M contract for workflow system administration to Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,595,093 ($3.6M)

Contractor: Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2022-04-01

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: FMWF WORKFLOW SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.6 million to CHICKASAW STRATEGIC POINTE, LLC for work described as: FMWF WORKFLOW SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for computer systems design services, a common IT support function. 3. The firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The contract duration of 1460 days (4 years) indicates a long-term need for these services. 5. The awardee, Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC, is a relatively new entity in federal contracting. 6. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle, common for IT services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $3.6 million contract for workflow system administration is challenging without more detailed service descriptions and performance metrics. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability. However, without comparison to similar contracts for comparable services or specific performance outcomes, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The per-unit cost is not readily available from the provided data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' While this indicates a competitive process, the 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests specific criteria or limitations were applied, potentially narrowing the field of eligible bidders. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies an effort to maximize competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process, even with exclusions, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best possible price and quality through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal employees within the General Services Administration (GSA) are likely the primary beneficiaries, utilizing the workflow system for administrative tasks. The contract supports the delivery of computer systems design and administration services. The geographic impact is centered in Ohio (OH), where the contractor is located. The contract supports the IT workforce by engaging a contractor for specialized system administration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited public information on contractor's past performance and capacity for a contract of this size and duration.
The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type warrants further investigation to understand potential limitations on competition.
Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the awarded services.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, indicating an effort to leverage market competition.
Firm fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty and reduces financial risk for the government.
The contract supports essential IT infrastructure and administrative functions within the GSA.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. The federal IT services market is vast, with agencies consistently investing in systems to improve efficiency and manage operations. This contract represents a small portion of overall federal IT spending, focusing on the administration and maintenance of workflow systems, a critical component for many government operations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The awardee, Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officers and program managers within the General Services Administration (GSA). As a delivery order under an IDIQ contract, the underlying IDIQ vehicle likely has its own oversight mechanisms. Transparency is facilitated by contract award databases, but detailed performance monitoring and Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the specific terms and potential issues arising during contract performance.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
IT Systems Administration Contracts
Computer Systems Design Services Contracts
Workflow Management Software Contracts

Risk Flags

Contractor Performance Risk
Competition Limitation Risk
Scope Creep Risk
Vendor Lock-in Risk

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.6 million to CHICKASAW STRATEGIC POINTE, LLC. FMWF WORKFLOW SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHICKASAW STRATEGIC POINTE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-04-01. End: 2026-03-31.

What is the track record of Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC in performing federal contracts, particularly for IT services?

Information regarding Chickasaw Strategic Pointe, LLC's prior federal contract performance is limited in publicly available databases. As a relatively new entity or one with minimal prior federal awards, assessing their established track record for delivering complex IT services like workflow system administration is challenging. Further investigation into their corporate history, past projects (both government and commercial), and client testimonials would be necessary to build a comprehensive picture of their capabilities and reliability. Without extensive past performance data, agencies often rely on pre-award surveys, financial stability assessments, and technical capability evaluations to mitigate risks associated with awarding contracts to less experienced vendors.

How does the awarded price of $3.6 million compare to similar workflow system administration contracts?

Directly comparing the $3.6 million total contract value to similar workflow system administration contracts is difficult without more specific details on the scope of work, service levels, and duration of comparable contracts. Federal IT service contracts can vary significantly in price based on complexity, required expertise, and geographic location. To perform a robust benchmark, one would need to identify contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 541512), similar service descriptions, and comparable contract durations (1460 days). Analyzing the average cost per year or per service hour for similar GSA contracts or contracts awarded by other agencies for comparable IT administration tasks would provide a more accurate valuation context.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential underperformance by the contractor, cost overruns (though mitigated by firm-fixed-price), and the risk of vendor lock-in if the system becomes highly customized. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management by GSA, including regular performance reviews, clear deliverables, and defined service level agreements. The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type might indicate a specific need that only certain vendors could meet, potentially limiting future competition if the incumbent is not replaced. Ensuring clear exit strategies and data portability is also crucial to avoid long-term dependency.

How effective is the workflow system administration likely to be given the contract details?

The effectiveness of the workflow system administration hinges on the specific performance standards outlined in the contract and the contractor's ability to meet them. The firm-fixed-price structure incentivizes efficiency, but the quality of service is paramount. The General Services Administration (GSA) is expected to have mechanisms in place to monitor performance, such as regular reporting, user feedback channels, and potentially site visits. The success will depend on how well the contractor's administration supports the intended functions of the workflow system, ensuring reliability, security, and user accessibility for GSA personnel.

What are the historical spending patterns for workflow system administration services within the GSA?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for workflow system administration within the GSA would require access to detailed federal procurement data over several fiscal years. This would involve searching for contracts with similar NAICS codes (541512) and service descriptions awarded by GSA. Trends might reveal whether spending in this area is increasing or decreasing, whether GSA relies heavily on specific contract vehicles or awardees, and the typical contract values and durations. Understanding these patterns can help contextualize the current $3.6 million award and identify potential efficiencies or areas for cost savings in future procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - IT MANAGEMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFRA22R0001

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2600 JOHN SAXON BLVD STE 2209, NORMAN, OK, 73071

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, HUBZone Firm, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,848,314

Exercised Options: $3,595,093

Current Obligation: $3,595,093

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCB21D0026

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline