GSA's $23.8M Visual Information Management Services contract awarded to COSOLUTIONS EIS JV, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,794,994 ($23.8M)

Contractor: Cosolutions EIS JV, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2017-12-15

End Date: 2020-11-14

Contract Duration: 1,065 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ID09170049 ENTERPRISE VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22310

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $23.8 million to COSOLUTIONS EIS JV, LLC for work described as: ID09170049 ENTERPRISE VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in enterprise visual information management. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 1065 days indicates a medium-term need for these services. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 5. The services fall under Computer Systems Design, a key area for federal IT infrastructure. 6. The awardee, COSOLUTIONS EIS JV, LLC, is a joint venture, potentially indicating a specialized capability.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $23.8 million over its term is substantial for enterprise visual information management services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for IT systems design and integration services suggests this pricing is within a reasonable range, especially considering the scope and duration. The firm fixed-price structure provides a degree of cost control for the government. However, a more granular analysis of the specific deliverables and service levels would be needed for a definitive value-for-money assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 9 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government, as contractors vie to win the award.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this contract likely resulted in a more cost-effective solution for taxpayers, as multiple firms competed to offer their best pricing and capabilities.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring advanced visual information management solutions benefit from improved data organization and accessibility. The contract supports the delivery of computer systems design services, enhancing federal IT infrastructure. Services are likely to impact federal employees who rely on efficient visual data management for their work. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational areas of the General Services Administration and its supported agencies.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if the solution is highly proprietary.
Ensuring continued innovation and adaptation to evolving visual information technologies.
Managing the transition of services at contract end to maintain continuity.

Positive Signals

Award to a joint venture may indicate a focus on specialized expertise.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these services.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. This sector is characterized by rapid technological advancements and a diverse range of service providers, from large integrators to specialized firms. Federal spending in this area is substantial, supporting the modernization and operational efficiency of government IT systems. Comparable contracts often involve system design, integration, and ongoing support for complex IT solutions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity or a joint venture. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved as subcontractors, which could still provide opportunities within the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Mechanisms likely include contract performance reviews, regular reporting requirements from the contractor, and potentially the involvement of GSA's Office of Inspector General if performance issues or irregularities arise. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting.

Related Government Programs

Enterprise IT Services
Information Technology Professional Services
Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Visual Information Services

Risk Flags

Potential for technical obsolescence due to contract duration.
Need for robust performance monitoring to ensure service delivery quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $23.8 million to COSOLUTIONS EIS JV, LLC. ID09170049 ENTERPRISE VISUAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COSOLUTIONS EIS JV, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-12-15. End: 2020-11-14.

What is the specific nature of the 'Visual Information Management Services' being provided under this contract?

The contract ID 'IGF::OT::IGF' and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code '541512' (Computer Systems Design Services) suggest that the services involve the design, development, integration, and potentially maintenance of systems for managing visual information. This could encompass a wide range of data types, including images, videos, graphics, and other visual assets. The services might include data storage, retrieval, organization, cataloging, security, and distribution solutions tailored to the needs of federal agencies. The specific functionalities would depend on the detailed statement of work within the contract, which is not fully detailed in the provided data.

How does the awarded price of approximately $23.8 million compare to similar contracts for visual information management or IT design services?

Without specific details on the scope, duration, and deliverables, a precise comparison is challenging. However, for a contract spanning over 1000 days (approximately 3 years) and involving complex IT systems design, a total value of $23.8 million is within a plausible range for enterprise-level solutions. Federal IT contracts of this magnitude often involve significant customization, integration with existing systems, and ongoing support. Benchmarking against other GSA schedules or similar agency procurements for IT systems design and integration services would be necessary for a more accurate assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price nature suggests an effort to cap costs.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, for IT services contracts, KPIs and SLAs would focus on aspects such as system uptime, response times for support requests, data accuracy and integrity, security compliance, and timely delivery of project milestones. The General Services Administration (GSA) would have established these metrics in the contract's statement of work to ensure the contractor meets performance expectations and to provide a basis for evaluating the contractor's performance throughout the contract period.

What is the track record of COSOLUTIONS EIS JV, LLC in delivering similar visual information management or IT systems design services?

The provided data identifies COSOLUTIONS EIS JV, LLC as the awardee. As a joint venture, its track record might be a composite of its member companies' past performance or its own performance on previous contracts. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their contract history, client feedback, and performance evaluations on similar government or commercial contracts. Information on past performance is often a critical factor in the source selection process for federal procurements. A review of federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) could reveal past awards and performance information for this entity.

What is the historical spending trend for visual information management services by the General Services Administration or related agencies?

The provided data only pertains to a single contract (ID09170049). To understand historical spending trends for visual information management services, a broader analysis of federal procurement data over several fiscal years would be required. This would involve searching for contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541512) and keywords related to visual information management across various agencies, particularly those within GSA's purview. Analyzing trends would reveal whether spending in this area is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and identify major contract vehicles or agencies driving this spending.

Are there any specific risks identified with this contract, such as technical obsolescence or contractor performance issues?

The provided data does not explicitly list risks associated with this contract. However, general risks for IT services contracts include technical obsolescence (as technology evolves rapidly), potential contractor performance issues (delays, quality problems), cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and challenges in integrating new systems with legacy infrastructure. The fact that it's a firm fixed-price contract mitigates some financial risk for the government, but performance risks remain. The duration of the contract (over 1000 days) increases the potential for technology to become outdated during its term, necessitating careful management and potential modifications.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID09170049

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 22636 DAVIS DR STE 165, STERLING, VA, 20164

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $43,597,227

Exercised Options: $23,805,505

Current Obligation: $23,794,994

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06F1234Z

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline