GSA awards $93.4M contract for defense uniforms to Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $93,406 ($93.4K)

Contractor: Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-09-03

Contract Duration: 150 days

Daily Burn Rate: $623/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PMPI AFSOC DEFEND UNIFORMS

Place of Performance

Location: LEXINGTON, FAYETTE County, KENTUCKY, 40516

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $93,406.35 to ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC. for work described as: PMPI AFSOC DEFEND UNIFORMS Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for apparel and accessories, a common requirement for defense agencies. 3. Delivery order issued against a larger contract vehicle, suggesting potential for future task orders. 4. The contract duration is 150 days, indicating a short-term need for these items. 5. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability. 6. Awardee has experience in supplying similar goods, as suggested by the nature of the contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $93.4 million for a 150-day period for uniforms and accessories appears substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for defense apparel would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an effort to manage costs effectively. The award to a single entity, Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc., implies they were the most competitive bidder under the established criteria.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which typically means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 7 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more favorable price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Service members will receive necessary uniforms and apparel, ensuring operational readiness. The contract supports the Department of Defense's uniform requirements. The geographic impact is primarily national, serving defense personnel across various locations. This contract supports jobs within the apparel manufacturing and distribution sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price fluctuations if market conditions change significantly during the contract period, despite fixed-price structure.
Dependence on a single contractor for a critical supply item could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Ensuring consistent quality across all delivered uniform items is crucial.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contractor, Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc., is likely experienced in this product category.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), a reputable contracting agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader defense procurement sector, specifically focusing on apparel and accessories. The market for military uniforms and related gear is substantial, with numerous manufacturers and suppliers vying for government contracts. GSA's role in facilitating such procurements ensures access to a wide range of suppliers and competitive pricing for federal agencies. This specific award represents a portion of the overall defense spending on personnel equipment.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The primary awardee, Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc., is likely a larger entity, and their role in the small business ecosystem would depend on their own subcontracting practices, which are not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract, employing various oversight mechanisms including contract performance monitoring and compliance checks. As a delivery order under a larger contract, it benefits from the established oversight framework of the parent contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Uniform Procurement
Apparel and Accessories Manufacturing
GSA Schedule Contracts
Federal Supply Schedule 315990

Risk Flags

Short contract duration may pose delivery risks.
Potential for quality control issues if production is rushed.
Dependence on a single awardee for critical supplies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $93,406.35 to ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.. PMPI AFSOC DEFEND UNIFORMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $93,406.35.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-09-03.

What is the historical spending pattern for defense uniforms through GSA?

Historical spending on defense uniforms through GSA can be analyzed by examining past contract awards under relevant Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) and specific product service codes (PSCs) related to apparel and accessories. For instance, FSS 315990, which covers Apparel, Accessories, and Other Apparel Manufacturing, would be a key area to investigate. Analyzing award data over several fiscal years would reveal trends in contract values, the number of awarded contracts, and the primary contractors. This analysis would help contextualize the current $93.4 million award, indicating whether it represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending for this category. It would also highlight any shifts in procurement strategies or market dynamics over time.

How does the per-unit cost of items under this contract compare to similar defense uniform contracts?

A detailed per-unit cost comparison requires access to the specific line items and quantities within this $93.4 million contract, which are not publicly available in the provided summary data. However, such a comparison would involve identifying the types of uniforms and accessories being procured (e.g., shirts, trousers, insignia) and benchmarking their unit prices against historical awards for identical or comparable items issued to other defense contractors. Factors like material quality, manufacturing origin, and specific design requirements can influence unit costs. If this contract's unit prices are significantly higher or lower than established benchmarks, it could indicate either exceptional value or potential pricing issues that warrant further investigation into the contractor's cost structure and the competitive landscape.

What is Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc.'s track record with federal defense contracts?

Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, particularly within the defense and apparel sectors. A review of federal procurement databases would reveal the extent and nature of their past awards. Key aspects to examine include the total value of contracts awarded, the agencies they have served, the types of goods and services provided, and their performance ratings on previous contracts. A strong track record with consistent positive performance evaluations would suggest reliability and capability in fulfilling this current $93.4 million uniform contract. Conversely, any history of performance issues, contract disputes, or quality control problems would raise concerns about their ability to meet the demands of this new award.

What are the potential risks associated with a 150-day delivery order for uniforms?

The primary risk associated with a short 150-day delivery order for uniforms is the potential for supply chain disruptions or production delays that could impact timely delivery. Given the relatively short timeframe, any unforeseen issues in manufacturing, raw material sourcing, or logistics could lead to shortages or late arrivals, potentially affecting military readiness. Another risk is the possibility of receiving substandard quality if the contractor rushes production to meet the deadline. Furthermore, if this is a critical, time-sensitive requirement, the government has limited recourse if the contractor fails to deliver on schedule, beyond potential contract remedies that may not fully compensate for operational impacts.

How does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' classification impact price discovery?

The classification 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is a specific type of competitive procurement. It implies that while the competition was intended to be open to all responsible sources, certain sources were excluded based on predefined criteria, often related to specific capabilities or existing contract vehicles. This can still lead to robust price discovery if multiple qualified bidders participate. However, if the exclusion criteria inadvertently limit the pool of potential bidders too narrowly, it could reduce the overall competitive pressure and potentially lead to less optimal pricing compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The number of bidders (7 in this case) is a key indicator; a higher number generally suggests better price discovery.

What is the significance of the contract being a 'Firm Fixed Price' type for this uniform procurement?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is significant because it establishes a ceiling price that the contractor must adhere to, regardless of their actual costs incurred. For the government, this offers the highest degree of cost certainty and predictability, as the total price is known upfront. This is particularly beneficial for procuring standardized items like uniforms where the scope of work is well-defined. The risk of cost overruns is transferred to the contractor. If the contractor's costs are lower than anticipated, they realize a higher profit margin; if costs exceed expectations, their profit margin shrinks, or they may incur a loss. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage their costs efficiently.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CLOTHING, INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT, INSIGNA, AND JEWELRY

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFNA26Q0036

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 621 LYNNHAVEN PKWY, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23452

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $93,406

Exercised Options: $93,406

Current Obligation: $93,406

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFNA24D0004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline