Atlantic Diving Supply contract for apparel and accessories valued at over $722K, awarded by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $722,179 ($722.2K)

Contractor: Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-04-30

End Date: 2025-12-01

Contract Duration: 215 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PMPI IDIQ AFSOC MARSOC USASOC BAV

Place of Performance

Location: LEXINGTON, FAYETTE County, KENTUCKY, 40516

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $722,178.55 to ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC. for work described as: PMPI IDIQ AFSOC MARSOC USASOC BAV Key points: 1. The contract's value appears reasonable given the scope of apparel and accessories manufacturing. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 215 days indicates a short-term need for these supplies. 4. The fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 5. The award was made to Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc., a known entity in this sector. 6. The contract falls under the Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $722,000 for apparel and accessories seems aligned with typical government procurement for such items. Without specific details on the exact items and quantities, a direct per-unit cost comparison is difficult. However, the award to a single vendor under a competitive process suggests that the pricing was deemed fair and reasonable by the General Services Administration (GSA). The fixed-price nature of the contract further supports value for money by establishing a ceiling on expenditures.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that the solicitation was made available to all responsible prospective contractors. The presence of 7 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensures that the government receives offers from a diverse range of suppliers.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award. Multiple bids help drive down costs and ensure the government is not overpaying for the required goods.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military or law enforcement personnel who will utilize the apparel and accessories procured under this contract. The contract will deliver essential apparel and accessories, contributing to operational readiness and equipment needs. The geographic impact is primarily centered in Kentucky (KY), where the contractor is located. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities at Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. and its supply chain partners.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for over-reliance on a single supplier if future needs arise beyond this specific delivery order.
Limited visibility into the specific types and quality of apparel and accessories being procured without further detail.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
Contract awarded to a single entity, simplifying management for this specific order.

Sector Analysis

The apparel and accessories manufacturing sector is a significant part of the broader manufacturing industry. Government procurement in this area often supports specialized needs for uniforms, protective gear, and other essential clothing items for various agencies. The NAICS code 315990 covers a wide range of apparel manufacturing, and contracts like this contribute to the overall market activity within this segment. Benchmarking against similar apparel contracts would provide further context on pricing and volume.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal, unless Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. voluntarily engages small businesses in its supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for the oversight of this contract. As a delivery order under an existing contract vehicle, the oversight mechanisms are likely integrated into GSA's contract management processes. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Military Uniforms and Apparel Procurement
Law Enforcement Equipment Contracts
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules
Apparel Manufacturing Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Specific Item Details Missing
Potential Quality Control

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $722,178.55 to ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.. PMPI IDIQ AFSOC MARSOC USASOC BAV

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $722,178.55.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-30. End: 2025-12-01.

What is the track record of Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. in fulfilling government contracts for apparel and accessories?

Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. has a history of receiving government contracts, particularly within the defense and public safety sectors. Their experience often includes providing a range of equipment and apparel. To assess their track record specifically for apparel and accessories, a review of past performance evaluations and contract completion history would be necessary. This would involve examining whether they have consistently met delivery schedules, quality standards, and budgetary requirements on similar previous awards. Without access to detailed performance data, it's presumed they were selected based on demonstrated capability and past success in fulfilling government requirements.

How does the per-unit cost of items under this contract compare to market rates or similar government contracts?

A precise per-unit cost comparison is not feasible with the provided data, as the specific items, quantities, and detailed specifications are not included. The contract value of over $722,000 is for a delivery order, implying a specific set of goods. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify the exact items (e.g., specific types of shirts, pants, accessories), their quantities, and compare these to publicly available pricing from other government contracts (e.g., through GSA Advantage or other contract databases) or commercial market rates. The fact that it was awarded under full and open competition with 7 bidders suggests the pricing was likely competitive, but a definitive comparison requires more granular product information.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential quality control issues with the apparel and accessories, delivery delays, and price fluctuations if the contract were not fixed-price. Mitigation strategies are in place: the contract is firm fixed-price, which caps the government's financial exposure. The award through full and open competition with multiple bidders suggests a vetting process that includes assessing contractor capability and past performance, reducing the risk of selecting an unqualified vendor. The relatively short duration (215 days) also limits the exposure period for potential issues. However, specific quality assurance and inspection protocols would be crucial for mitigating product quality risks.

How effective is the competition level in ensuring value for taxpayers on this contract?

The competition level, with 7 bidders participating in a full and open process, is generally effective in ensuring value for taxpayers. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing as companies vie for the contract. This process allows the government to solicit a range of offers and select the one that provides the best value, considering both price and other factors like technical merit or past performance. The exclusion of sources in the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' phrasing might warrant further investigation to ensure it did not unduly limit the competitive pool, but generally, this indicates a robust effort to achieve competitive pricing.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar apparel and accessories contracts by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending patterns for similar apparel and accessories contracts by the GSA can be analyzed by examining past awards under relevant NAICS codes (like 315990) and Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) reports. GSA procures a vast array of goods and services, including apparel, often through its Multiple Award Schedules (MAS). Analyzing trends in contract values, number of bidders, and average award prices over several fiscal years would reveal spending patterns. This specific contract's value of over $722,000 would be compared against the typical range for similar items and quantities procured by GSA or other agencies through GSA vehicles to assess if it aligns with historical norms or represents an outlier.

Are there any specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) associated with this delivery order?

The provided data does not explicitly list specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this delivery order. However, standard government contract management practices typically include requirements for timely delivery, adherence to specifications, and quality control. For apparel and accessories, this would likely involve ensuring the correct sizes, colors, materials, and overall quality meet the solicitation's requirements. The contracting officer and relevant government personnel would monitor these aspects throughout the performance period. Formal KPIs, if established, would be detailed within the contract's statement of work or performance work statement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CLOTHING, INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT, INSIGNA, AND JEWELRY

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFNA25Q0054

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 621 LYNNHAVEN PKWY, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23452

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $722,179

Exercised Options: $722,179

Current Obligation: $722,179

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFNA24D0004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline