HII Mission Technologies Corp awarded $21.7M for AFLCMCWB AAS Support Bridge by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,697,657 ($21.7M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2022-06-06

End Date: 2023-08-04

Contract Duration: 424 days

Daily Burn Rate: $51.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: AFLCMCWB AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, MONTGOMERY County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $21.7 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: AFLCMCWB AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in specialized support services. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding environment for this type of service. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, given the nature of R&D support services. 4. Performance context is tied to specific Air Force Life Cycle Management Center needs. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader R&D and IT support landscape.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $21.7 million for AAS Support Bridge services appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized R&D support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for advanced systems support is necessary for a definitive value assessment. Without more granular data on the specific services rendered and their complexity, it's challenging to definitively assess value for money. However, the duration and scope suggest a substantial, albeit not exceptionally high, investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of full and open competition generally suggests a healthy market for these services, allowing the government to solicit proposals from a wide range of qualified contractors. The number of bidders and the specific evaluation criteria would provide further insight into the intensity of the competition and its impact on pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and encourages innovation among bidders, leading to better value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) and its associated programs requiring advanced systems support. Services delivered are expected to include research, development, and technical support for specific aerospace systems. The geographic impact is primarily centered in Ohio, where the contract is managed and likely executed. Workforce implications may involve specialized engineers, scientists, and technical personnel employed by HII Mission Technologies Corp and its potential subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined.
Dependence on key personnel could pose a risk if turnover is high.
Integration challenges with existing systems if not managed proactively.

Positive Signals

Award to an established contractor like HII Mission Technologies Corp suggests a degree of reliability.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition indicates a robust market and potential for competitive pricing.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector, specifically focusing on advanced systems support. The market for such services is characterized by high technical expertise, significant government investment, and a relatively small number of highly specialized contractors. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large-scale R&D support contracts for defense or aerospace agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities. The extent of small business participation will depend on HII Mission Technologies Corp's subcontracting plan and the availability of specialized small businesses capable of fulfilling specific needs within the contract's scope.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) and the contracting activity within the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center. Accountability measures would be tied to performance metrics outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of performance and financials may be proprietary.

Related Government Programs

Air Force Research and Development Contracts
Aerospace Systems Support
Advanced Technology Development
Federal IT and Engineering Services

Risk Flags

Contract duration may be short for complex R&D.
Specific deliverables and technical scope require further clarification.
Performance history of contractor on similar tasks needs detailed review.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $21.7 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AFLCMCWB AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-06-06. End: 2023-08-04.

What is the historical spending pattern for AFLCMCWB AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE contracts awarded to HII Mission Technologies Corp or its predecessors?

Analyzing historical spending for the AFLCMCWB AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE program requires access to detailed contract databases beyond the provided data. However, the current award of $21.7 million suggests a significant, potentially multi-year, investment. If this is a bridge contract, it implies a need to maintain continuity of services while a more permanent solution is sought. Understanding previous contract values, durations, and awarded contractors for similar support functions within AFLCMC would provide crucial context for assessing whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending for this type of support.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or ceiling of similar R&D support contracts within the Department of Defense?

The $21.7 million award for the AFLCMCWB AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE contract needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts to assess its value. Without specific details on the scope of work, duration, and deliverables, a precise comparison is difficult. However, R&D support contracts for major defense programs can range from a few million to hundreds of millions of dollars. Factors such as the complexity of the systems supported, the level of technical expertise required, and the duration of the contract significantly influence the total value. This $21.7 million appears to be a substantial but not extraordinary amount for specialized support, suggesting it likely covers a defined period or set of critical tasks.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and success metrics for this contract, and how is performance being monitored?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for the AFLCMCWB AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE contract. Typically, for R&D support contracts, KPIs would focus on technical milestones, research outcomes, timely delivery of reports, adherence to project schedules, and quality of technical analyses. Performance monitoring would likely be conducted by contracting officers and technical representatives within the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC). These individuals would review contractor progress reports, conduct regular meetings, and assess deliverables against contract requirements to ensure satisfactory performance and compliance.

What is the track record of HII Mission Technologies Corp in delivering similar R&D support services to the Department of Defense?

HII Mission Technologies Corp, as a subsidiary of Huntington Ingalls Industries, has a substantial track record in providing a wide array of services to the Department of Defense, including advanced technology development, engineering, and mission support. While specific details on their performance for 'AAS SUPPORT BRIDGE' are not in the provided data, their broader portfolio suggests experience with complex defense systems. A thorough assessment would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any reported issues or successes on similar contracts to gauge their capability and reliability in delivering R&D support.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Potential risks for this contract include technical challenges in R&D, potential delays in project timelines, cost overruns if not managed tightly (though it's a Firm Fixed Price contract), and the possibility of evolving requirements. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust project management by HII Mission Technologies Corp, clear communication channels with the government client (AFLCMC), proactive risk identification and assessment, and contingency planning. The government's oversight, including regular reviews and performance monitoring, also serves as a key risk mitigation factor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFNA22R0005

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc

Address: 4021 EXECUTIVE DR, DAYTON, OH, 45430

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,038,802

Exercised Options: $23,038,802

Current Obligation: $21,697,657

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F063CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline