GSA awards $2.2M contract for logistics support to Saliensce Consulting LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,201,341 ($2.2M)

Contractor: Saliense Consulting LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2020-09-22

End Date: 2025-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,833 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AFMRA LOGISTICS ADMINISTRATIVE CONTINUANCE

Place of Performance

Location: FREDERICK, FREDERICK County, MARYLAND, 21702

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.2 million to SALIENSE CONSULTING LLC for work described as: AFMRA LOGISTICS ADMINISTRATIVE CONTINUANCE Key points: 1. Contract awarded for management consulting services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The contract duration of 1833 days suggests a long-term requirement for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 4. The contract is a definitive contract, implying a clear scope of work. 5. The award was made by the General Services Administration, a common contracting agency.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific details on the services provided. The per-unit cost is not readily available. However, the total award amount of $2.2 million over approximately five years for management consulting services appears within a reasonable range for specialized support, but a direct comparison to similar contracts is difficult due to the lack of detailed service descriptions. Further analysis would be needed to determine if this represents excellent value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when only one vendor can provide the required services, or in specific circumstances where full and open competition is not feasible. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from a potentially lower price that could have resulted from a competitive bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the best possible price due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government's ability to negotiate favorable terms is limited in sole-source awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the agencies or departments within the General Services Administration that require logistics administrative support. The services delivered are expected to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of logistics operations. The contract's impact is primarily focused on federal administrative functions, with potential indirect benefits to the broader federal supply chain. Workforce implications are likely limited to the contractor's personnel and the government personnel overseeing the contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits price competition, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers.
Lack of detailed service description makes it difficult to assess the true value and necessity of the contract.
Long contract duration without clear performance metrics raises concerns about ongoing relevance and adaptability.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope is well-defined.
Award to a single contractor suggests specialized expertise may be required for the specific logistics needs.
The General Services Administration's involvement indicates adherence to established procurement processes, even for sole-source awards.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the management consulting services sector, a broad category encompassing advisory and assistance services. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services to improve efficiency, implement new technologies, and manage complex operations. The market for management consulting is competitive, but specific niche areas, like specialized logistics support, can sometimes lead to sole-source awards if unique capabilities are required. The total federal spending on management and professional services is substantial, with contracts like this representing a small fraction of the overall expenditure.

Small Business Impact

The contract indicates that small business participation was not a primary consideration, as the 'sb' (small business) flag is false and the contract was not set aside for small businesses. This suggests that the prime contractor, Saliensce Consulting LLC, is likely not a small business, or if it is, subcontracting opportunities for other small businesses were not explicitly mandated or pursued in this award. The absence of small business set-aside provisions means that the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract is minimal.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award and the lack of publicly available detailed performance data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Logistics Management Services
Management and Management Consulting Services
Administrative Support Services
Federal Acquisition Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pricing.
Lack of detailed service description hinders value assessment.
Limited public information on contractor performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.2 million to SALIENSE CONSULTING LLC. AFMRA LOGISTICS ADMINISTRATIVE CONTINUANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SALIENSE CONSULTING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-09-22. End: 2025-09-29.

What specific logistics administrative services are being provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Other Management Consulting Services' (NAICS code 541618) and is related to 'AFMRA LOGISTICS ADMINISTRATIVE CONTINUANCE'. However, the specific nature of the logistics administrative services is not detailed. These services could range from strategic planning for logistics operations, process improvement, administrative support for supply chain management, data analysis for logistics efficiency, or policy development related to logistics. Without a more detailed statement of work, it is impossible to ascertain the precise functions being performed by Saliensce Consulting LLC.

How does the $2.2 million award compare to similar logistics administrative support contracts?

Direct comparison of the $2.2 million award for logistics administrative support is difficult without more granular data on the scope and duration of comparable contracts. The General Services Administration (GSA) procures a wide array of management and administrative support services. However, given this contract spans approximately five years (September 2020 to September 2025), the annual value is roughly $440,000. This figure is within a plausible range for specialized consulting services supporting federal logistics functions. A comprehensive benchmark would require analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes, contract types, and service complexities awarded by GSA or other agencies.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics for this contract. Typically, for management consulting services, KPIs might include adherence to project timelines, quality of deliverables, client satisfaction, cost savings achieved, or efficiency improvements implemented. For a logistics administrative support contract, metrics could also involve improvements in delivery times, reduction in logistical errors, or enhanced inventory management. The effectiveness of this contract would be assessed by the contracting officer against the terms outlined in the Statement of Work and any agreed-upon performance standards.

What is the track record of Saliensce Consulting LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

Information on the track record of Saliensce Consulting LLC for performing similar federal contracts is not provided in the data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing the company's past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), previous contract awards, and any reported issues or successes. Without this historical data, it is challenging to gauge their reliability, expertise, and past performance in delivering logistics administrative support or other management consulting services to the federal government.

What is the rationale behind awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The data explicitly states the contract was awarded under 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', which signifies a sole-source award. The rationale for sole-source awards typically falls under specific exceptions to full and open competition, such as when only one responsible source is available, or in cases of urgent and compelling need. For management consulting services, this could be due to highly specialized expertise, proprietary knowledge, or a unique understanding of a specific agency's complex logistics challenges that only Saliensce Consulting LLC possesses. The specific justification would be documented in the contract file by the General Services Administration.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: ID03200042

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1775 TYSONS BLVD 5TH FL, TYSONS CORNER, VA, 22102

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,136,576

Exercised Options: $2,233,529

Current Obligation: $2,201,341

Actual Outlays: $1,763,710

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: SERVICES PURSUANT TO FAR 12.102(G)

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline